Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

AnotherMcIntosh

(11,064 posts)
2. And is the corollary: a high ownership of fire extinguishers in homes make countries less safe?
Wed Sep 18, 2013, 10:29 AM
Sep 2013

If there are arsonists, should matches be taken away from the arsonists? Or should home owners be prohibited from owning fire extinguishers?

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Folk Darwinism meets disaster capitalism coldmountain Sep 2013 #1
And is the corollary: a high ownership of fire extinguishers in homes make countries less safe? AnotherMcIntosh Sep 2013 #2
Get back to us on that the next time a fire extinguisher is the tool used to kill a dozen people. IveWornAHundredPants Sep 2013 #6
Fire extinguishers put out fires -- they don't cause them starroute Sep 2013 #7
You are right. Obviously, homeowners should not be allowed to choose as to whether to own AnotherMcIntosh Sep 2013 #8
did that poster say that all guns should be banned? no they didn't. CreekDog Sep 2013 #16
At the risk of billh58 Sep 2013 #19
Bans on new firearms is "coming for your guns" aikoaiko Sep 2013 #23
SCOTUS reference: billh58 Sep 2013 #24
So are you admitting that you are "coming for the guns" aikoaiko Sep 2013 #26
Nope. billh58 Sep 2013 #28
Semi-automatic weapons clearly aren't "unusual" NickB79 Sep 2013 #38
"have been some of the most widely sold long guns in the US for over a decade" Heywood J Sep 2013 #39
It's mostly marketing and media hype, really NickB79 Sep 2013 #50
That's a nice hunting rifle. Looks well-made. Heywood J Sep 2013 #65
Looking for a point of agreement sarisataka Sep 2013 #43
There is a valid fear that it's the first step in a process that ends that way. NutmegYankee Sep 2013 #25
Yes, it does - n/t primavera Sep 2013 #58
hmmm ConcernedCanuk Sep 2013 #3
Only the die hard billh58 Sep 2013 #4
The NRA has worked for years to kill any studies that would look at links ... Botany Sep 2013 #9
Think Progress: Largest Gun Study Ever: More Guns, More Murder Botany Sep 2013 #5
Unpossible. I've only known two gun lovin, teabaggers who have shot themselves. onehandle Sep 2013 #10
In a related story, smoking causes cancer. SansACause Sep 2013 #11
The violent crime victimization rate is 28% of what it was in 1993. lumberjack_jeff Sep 2013 #12
Changing demographics Bragi Sep 2013 #18
OMG, lol. closeupready Sep 2013 #21
How low might it be with less guns, fewer Zimmermans, armed border Klan, etc. Hoyt Sep 2013 #51
I don't know what you can do to legislatively limit the number of Zimmermans. lumberjack_jeff Sep 2013 #52
Aging population, better surveillance, tougher sentences, etc., not your gunz. Hoyt Sep 2013 #54
You're poking your finger in the wrong chest, pal. lumberjack_jeff Sep 2013 #55
Some % of GOP vote comes from gun lugger licenses. RedCloud Sep 2013 #13
I agree completely, though I did find it odd to see that hughee99 Sep 2013 #14
(your sarcasm is noted!) Because this study is half baked. Look at the countries you mention; 7962 Sep 2013 #15
It certainly makes sense that more guns equal more GUN related deaths, hughee99 Sep 2013 #20
It looks like a pick and choose article. Guaguacoa Sep 2013 #62
Kicked and recommended. Uncle Joe Sep 2013 #17
! blkmusclmachine Sep 2013 #22
Gee, what a surprise. I mean really. Warpy Sep 2013 #27
"The gun ownership rate was a strong and independent predictor of firearm-related death," askeptic Sep 2013 #29
On the other hand... EX500rider Sep 2013 #30
If you want to be a little less obvious, don't hotlink from Guns.com. Robb Sep 2013 #31
Yes the ole attack the source when you got nothing else.. n/t EX500rider Sep 2013 #33
It is a user problem, not a tool problem. ManiacJoe Sep 2013 #32
Which is why at a minimum we should be thoroughly vetting and licensing all users. Robb Sep 2013 #34
Those doctors are wrong, sorry. Adam-Bomb Sep 2013 #35
True Daniel537 Sep 2013 #42
"High gun ownership"? I agree, people shouldn't handle guns when they're high. Throd Sep 2013 #36
That would be good to know, if only all deaths were committed by firearm. LAGC Sep 2013 #37
re: "Where there's a will, there's a way..." discntnt_irny_srcsm Sep 2013 #45
Who says the two are mutually exclusive? primavera Sep 2013 #60
As usual, the study does not separate the legal from the illegal gun owners. N/T GreenStormCloud Sep 2013 #40
There is no moral difference between criminals and legal gun owners hack89 Sep 2013 #41
It's: "You're law-abiding until you're not." Eleanors38 Sep 2013 #44
The NSA knows everything. discntnt_irny_srcsm Sep 2013 #46
Gun-control is arranging deck chairs on the Titanic. Eleanors38 Sep 2013 #47
not to worry... discntnt_irny_srcsm Sep 2013 #48
Yep, the gun culture told us Zimmerman was a Saint, before and after murdering T Martin. Hoyt Sep 2013 #56
Are all gun owners pre-criminals in your eyes? nt hack89 Sep 2013 #57
They are clearly more likely to shoot, intimidate, cause an accident, scare little kids, etc., Hoyt Sep 2013 #59
Not just gun owners primavera Sep 2013 #61
It's certainly less safe for innocent people. Sunlei Sep 2013 #49
The full study is in this month's issue of DUH! magazine. KamaAina Sep 2013 #53
The dogs bark. The caravan rolls on. Blandocyte Sep 2013 #63
barkward-looking Neanderthals don't like the ... quadrature Sep 2013 #64
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»High gun ownership makes ...»Reply #2