USPS Plans 27,000 Job Cuts as Plants Shut

[brentspeak]

68. On the contrary

The existence of the Internet is apparently your vehicle for attempting to confuse people (is it your paycheck, as well?):

"A voice vote requires unanimous consent. If someone wants their votes to be recorded a recorded vote must be taken. If someone wanted to oppose this bill they could have asked for a recorded vote. No one did. In the Senate it was a unanimous vote. Try your BS with someone who doesn't know the rules."

So because a voice vote was held, that means no Democrats voted against it, as you claimed earlier?

http://www.senate.gov/reference/resources/pdf/95-563.pdf

Whenever Representatives vote on the floor, there first is a “voice vote,” in which the Members in favor of the bill, amendment, or motion vote “Aye” in unison, followed by those voting “No.” Before the Speaker (or the chair of the Committee of the Whole) announces the result, any Representative can demand a “division vote,” in which the Members in favor stand up to be counted, again followed by those opposed. But before the result of either a voice vote or a division vote is announced, a Member may try to require another vote in which everyone’s position is recorded publicly.

Nothing there about a voice vote meaning "nobody voted against it", "everybody voted in favor of it", nor that declining to request a recorded vote means a completely uniform voice vote.

"Here is what the Postal Union said right after the bill was passed..."

It's been noted for some time that the various postal unions failed to see the danger of the pre-funding requirement back in 2006. Not like their opposition to it would have prevented it from being rammed through the Republican Congress, anyway. They've been lobbying to have it revoked ever since: http://my.firedoglake.com/mmonk/2011/08/19/the-pre-funding-mandate-bringing-down-the-american-postal-workers-union/