Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Latest Breaking News

Showing Original Post only (View all)

Tony_FLADEM

(3,023 posts)
Thu Sep 19, 2013, 05:39 PM Sep 2013

Contractor Behind Snowden Vetting Did Washington Shooter Check [View all]

Last edited Thu Sep 19, 2013, 06:15 PM - Edit history (1)

Source: Bloomberg

The U.S. government contractor that vetted Edward Snowden, who leaked information about national surveillance programs, said it also performed a background check on the Washington Navy Yard shooter.

USIS, a unit of Falls Church, Virginia-based Altegrity Inc., did Aaron Alexis’s background investigation in 2007, Ray Howell, a USIS spokesman, said in an e-mail.

“Today we were informed that in 2007, USIS conducted a background check of Aaron Alexis” for the U.S. Office of Personnel Management, Howell said.

Howell said yesterday that USIS hadn’t vetted Alexis, who killed 12 people at the Navy Yard on Sept. 16 and then died in a shootout with police. Alexis had a secret-level clearance that would have enabled him to get an access card needed to get on the base.

The company can’t comment further because it is contractually prohibited from retaining information gathered during its background checks for the personnel office, he said.

Patrick McFarland, inspector general of the personnel office, has said there may have been shortcomings in USIS’s vetting of Snowden, a former Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corp. (BAH) employee who worked for the National Security Agency.



Read more: http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2013-09-19/contractor-behind-snowden-vetting-did-washington-shooter-check.html

37 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Hinky link. DURHAM D Sep 2013 #1
That speaks volumes !! nt Cryptoad Sep 2013 #4
And wouldn't you know it... seabeckind Sep 2013 #9
It appears to be owned by Providence Equity Partners. KamaAina Sep 2013 #20
Another one of those lucrative Federal contracts going to a RW anti-America group. kelliekat44 Sep 2013 #34
It is pretty clear that their bottom line is higher than their integrity. Agnosticsherbet Sep 2013 #2
All taxpayers need this - DURHAM D Sep 2013 #3
No, more like this jmowreader Sep 2013 #7
For a few certain blessed individuals ----its a Large Public Teat warrant46 Sep 2013 #18
"The Parallax View," starring Warren Beatty 1000words Sep 2013 #5
Channeling Dr. Strangelove... jmowreader Sep 2013 #6
Reason link is hinky is that it's missing http:// pinboy3niner Sep 2013 #8
Thanks! Tony_FLADEM Sep 2013 #10
From the article DURHAM D Sep 2013 #11
Somebody Needs To Review All The Security Checks That USIS..... global1 Sep 2013 #12
They have been caught "fabricating" clearances several times but DURHAM D Sep 2013 #13
I smell a liability suit Luschnig Sep 2013 #14
god, how many billions of our Federal funds did our Gov. pay that contractor 'corp.'? Sunlei Sep 2013 #15
$253M in 2012. DURHAM D Sep 2013 #21
Wow. Outsourcing for the win. AtheistCrusader Sep 2013 #16
Totally surprising, NOT! nt alp227 Sep 2013 #17
was there anything in snowden's background that would've precluded him from receiving his clearance? frylock Sep 2013 #19
Didnt they find he was an activist? Thinkingabout Sep 2013 #23
yes Botany Sep 2013 #24
Snowy shouldn't have had a job running Ethernet cables snooper2 Sep 2013 #37
This would not happen if they weren't using contractors ..... Botany Sep 2013 #22
Sorry, but a few things just don't add up. Clearance requirements for a SECRET clearance verses 24601 Sep 2013 #25
Wow...thanks for all that info. seabeckind Sep 2013 #26
How hard is it for one of the Cabinet Secretaries to call them up and fire them immediately.. Historic NY Sep 2013 #27
Well for one thing, who's going to pick up the slack? bluedigger Sep 2013 #28
Thats the problem hiring replacement private workers. Historic NY Sep 2013 #29
We've got a lot of people leaving the military in the next few years. MADem Sep 2013 #31
Oh, it's a fixable problem all right. bluedigger Sep 2013 #32
Hee hee....there's "immediately" and then there's federal government "immediately." MADem Sep 2013 #33
Most times seabeckind Sep 2013 #35
Heard this argument a lot seabeckind Sep 2013 #36
as long as dick cheney is somehowb making a buck arely staircase Sep 2013 #30
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Contractor Behind Snowden...