Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

MADem

(135,425 posts)
33. Hee hee....there's "immediately" and then there's federal government "immediately."
Fri Sep 20, 2013, 06:13 AM
Sep 2013

The latter is like turning an aircraft carrier!

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Hinky link. DURHAM D Sep 2013 #1
That speaks volumes !! nt Cryptoad Sep 2013 #4
And wouldn't you know it... seabeckind Sep 2013 #9
It appears to be owned by Providence Equity Partners. KamaAina Sep 2013 #20
Another one of those lucrative Federal contracts going to a RW anti-America group. kelliekat44 Sep 2013 #34
It is pretty clear that their bottom line is higher than their integrity. Agnosticsherbet Sep 2013 #2
All taxpayers need this - DURHAM D Sep 2013 #3
No, more like this jmowreader Sep 2013 #7
For a few certain blessed individuals ----its a Large Public Teat warrant46 Sep 2013 #18
"The Parallax View," starring Warren Beatty 1000words Sep 2013 #5
Channeling Dr. Strangelove... jmowreader Sep 2013 #6
Reason link is hinky is that it's missing http:// pinboy3niner Sep 2013 #8
Thanks! Tony_FLADEM Sep 2013 #10
From the article DURHAM D Sep 2013 #11
Somebody Needs To Review All The Security Checks That USIS..... global1 Sep 2013 #12
They have been caught "fabricating" clearances several times but DURHAM D Sep 2013 #13
I smell a liability suit Luschnig Sep 2013 #14
god, how many billions of our Federal funds did our Gov. pay that contractor 'corp.'? Sunlei Sep 2013 #15
$253M in 2012. DURHAM D Sep 2013 #21
Wow. Outsourcing for the win. AtheistCrusader Sep 2013 #16
Totally surprising, NOT! nt alp227 Sep 2013 #17
was there anything in snowden's background that would've precluded him from receiving his clearance? frylock Sep 2013 #19
Didnt they find he was an activist? Thinkingabout Sep 2013 #23
yes Botany Sep 2013 #24
Snowy shouldn't have had a job running Ethernet cables snooper2 Sep 2013 #37
This would not happen if they weren't using contractors ..... Botany Sep 2013 #22
Sorry, but a few things just don't add up. Clearance requirements for a SECRET clearance verses 24601 Sep 2013 #25
Wow...thanks for all that info. seabeckind Sep 2013 #26
How hard is it for one of the Cabinet Secretaries to call them up and fire them immediately.. Historic NY Sep 2013 #27
Well for one thing, who's going to pick up the slack? bluedigger Sep 2013 #28
Thats the problem hiring replacement private workers. Historic NY Sep 2013 #29
We've got a lot of people leaving the military in the next few years. MADem Sep 2013 #31
Oh, it's a fixable problem all right. bluedigger Sep 2013 #32
Hee hee....there's "immediately" and then there's federal government "immediately." MADem Sep 2013 #33
Most times seabeckind Sep 2013 #35
Heard this argument a lot seabeckind Sep 2013 #36
as long as dick cheney is somehowb making a buck arely staircase Sep 2013 #30
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Contractor Behind Snowden...»Reply #33