Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Latest Breaking News

saras

(6,670 posts)

3. If he's "just a kid" he has no right to be in college, or to have a webcam

Reply to Little Tich (Original post)

Fri Feb 24, 2012, 10:58 PM

Feb 2012

And under no circumstances does he ever have a right to put a hidden camera in someone else's home - even if it's also his own home. With EVERYTHING else removed from the situation, that's a really creepy crime, and deserves criminal charges all by itself.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

8 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Lawyer: Rutgers webcam spy suspect just a boy, not a bigot; prosecutor called acts �malicious� [View all] Little Tich Feb 2012 OP

how would he liked to be secretly taped having sex and put out for others to see JI7 Feb 2012 #1

Just let us set the record that lukkadairish Feb 2012 #2

If he's "just a kid" he has no right to be in college, or to have a webcam saras Feb 2012 #3

so he shouldn't face consequences for his actions, is that it? SemperEadem Feb 2012 #4

wonder if Altman would call Ravi 'an 18 year-old boy, but no criminal' if Ravi had raped his mother? stockholmer Feb 2012 #5

This story just makes me sad for everyone involved. closeupready Feb 2012 #6

If it were murder of a straight man he would be "an adult" Fearless Feb 2012 #7

Thinking out loud: Part of what I think went wrong here - Ravi Dharun, closeupready Feb 2012 #8