Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Latest Breaking News

(40,168 posts)

6. Next,he'll claim he was ashore when it hit the rocks.

Mon Sep 23, 2013, 12:51 PM

Sep 2013

Actually, that may not be far from the truth, considering he abandoned his vessel.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

14 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Costa Concordia captain blames helmsman for crash [View all] Cooley Hurd Sep 2013 OP

What a POS. MicaelS Sep 2013 #1

No, Captain, it doesn't work like that. Turbineguy Sep 2013 #2

An aside, the Titanic would also have fared better by not veering to port. AtheistCrusader Sep 2013 #5

We have a saying- No Vested Interest Sep 2013 #3

It is a well established principle that the captain is responsible. Fortinbras Armstrong Sep 2013 #4

Indeed. See: Joe Hazelwood. cloudbase Sep 2013 #10

Next,he'll claim he was ashore when it hit the rocks. TheCowsCameHome Sep 2013 #6

I am amazed at how quickly some can respond to affirm a post! Festivito Sep 2013 #7

Uh, the evidence is pretty damning against Schettino Kelvin Mace Sep 2013 #8

Centuries of legal tradition mean yes, the captain is at fault. Posteritatis Sep 2013 #9

Costa Concordia captain is full of crap. cbayer Sep 2013 #11