Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Latest Breaking News
In reply to the discussion: "Chaos Computer Club: iPhone 5S finger-sniffer COMPROMISED" [View all]TM99
(8,352 posts)28. Your fingerprint. Your phone.
You check your iPhone dozens and dozens of times a day, probably more. Entering a passcode each time just slows you down. But you do it because making sure no one else has access to your iPhone is important. With iPhone 5s, getting into your phone is faster, easier, and even a little futuristic. Introducing Touch ID a new fingerprint identity sensor.
Put your finger on the Home button, and just like that your iPhone unlocks. Its a convenient and highly secure way to access your phone. Your fingerprint can also approve purchases from iTunes Store, the App Store, and the iBooks Store, so you dont have to enter your password. And Touch ID is capable of 360-degree readability. Which means no matter what its orientation portrait, landscape, or anything in between your iPhone reads your fingerprint and knows who you are. And because Touch ID lets you enroll multiple fingerprints, it knows the people you trust, too.
This is a big deal because Apple has made it a big deal.
Has biometrics been used before? Yup, for over a decade now. Is it fairly secure. Yup, it is, but serious hackers will find ways like this to crack the security. Has biometrics been a part of heavily marketed consumer products?
This is where this now comes in as real and important. No. Thinkpad business models had options for biometrics. But Apple is pushing this through their marketing as not only a 'new' convenience but also as being 'secure'. So if that 'security' is cracked within days of release, that is a huge marketing failure even if it isn't a huge security failure.
But as a techie, the key for me is that Touch ID allows the enrollment of multiple fingerprints. That is a nice further little vector for hacking.
I agree with the OP in that given the choice, I would prefer a well-managed password system over a biometric scanner. Yes, a housewife's iTunes account may not be worth hacking, but now that iDevices are being used in business & government, those people's secure data are indeed worth hacking.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
30 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Um, so to compromise it, you somehow have to get a hi-res image of someone's fingerprint
frazzled
Sep 2013
#1
You only have to lift their print from somewhere else. Also super easy to do.
TalkingDog
Sep 2013
#16
OK, assuming you have access to a persons finger, or fingerprints, and apparently a 3D printer.
denverbill
Sep 2013
#3
Etching a circuit is a lot easier than you think. Don't sell yourself short.
AtheistCrusader
Sep 2013
#17
'How to hack' is the first step in establishing whether the feature meets the sales hype or not.
AtheistCrusader
Sep 2013
#10
geepers... given that a lost iPhone will be covered with owner's fingerprints
tomm2thumbs
Sep 2013
#11
with so many of the owner's fingerprints that you might have a heard time getting a clean one.
olddad56
Sep 2013
#21
Probably piece one together, and I doubt it actually has to be perfect at 1200dpi
sir pball
Sep 2013
#25