Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Latest Breaking News

Showing Original Post only (View all)

jakeXT

(10,575 posts)
Sat Feb 25, 2012, 06:19 AM Feb 2012

Syria: Barack Obama says the world 'cannot be bystanders' as slaughter continues [View all]

President Barack Obama declared Friday that the US and its allies would consider "every tool available" to stop the slaughter of innocent people in Syria, using his most forceful words to date in response to an increasingly grim crisis that has gripped the world.

The president did not give specifics about what the US or other countries would do to help. Lacking international consensus on any armed confrontation, and with Syrian President Bashar al-Assad unyielding, the United States has only limited options and leverage.

"It is absolutely imperative for the international community to rally and send a clear message to President Assad that it is time for a transition," Mr Obama said after a meeting with the Danish prime minister. "It is time for that regime to move on. And it is time to stop the killing of Syrian citizens by their own government."

The president added that nations cannot afford to be "bystanders" as the killing continues.

...
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/middleeast/syria/9105303/Syria-Barack-Obama-says-the-world-cannot-be-bystanders-as-slaughter-continues.html
21 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
I agree with not standing by while slaughter continues, so why doesn't that same logic apply to IndyJones Feb 2012 #1
well there is SOME oil down there isnt there? *sarcasm* n/t JesterCS Feb 2012 #2
It would certainly be easier to get the oil through Syria for Israel than jakeXT Feb 2012 #5
The US as a general rule dipsydoodle Feb 2012 #3
I beg to differ; greiner3 Feb 2012 #8
But not always - e.g. Somalia in Dec 92. The original mission was stop the fighting, open supply 24601 Feb 2012 #18
Didn't we ship weapons to Mexico ? jakeXT Feb 2012 #4
Is Mexico's official government shelling their civilians? boppers Feb 2012 #6
Many believe that the government is working with the drug lords. IndyJones Feb 2012 #14
Why does that matter? David__77 Feb 2012 #16
Venezuela's murder rate is 3 times Mexico's. n/t EX500rider Feb 2012 #19
Bring the troops home now! CAPHAVOC Feb 2012 #10
And as we leave make sure that the weapons are in the hands of the rebels. On this I agree with jwirr Feb 2012 #12
I think you mean Colombia. Arctic Dave Feb 2012 #11
I was just joking about the Lawrence of Arabia movie. CAPHAVOC Feb 2012 #13
I think it's France's turn to take on another foreign civil war slackmaster Feb 2012 #7
Sending in the cheese eating surrender monkeys? DUIC Feb 2012 #9
Sarkozy would never do that now Laughing Mirror Feb 2012 #15
Why not? Ter Feb 2012 #17
Salon (Jordan Michael Smith): Why Obama won’t intervene in Syria pampango Feb 2012 #20
Kosovo option? jakeXT Feb 2012 #21
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Syria: Barack Obama says ...