Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

StevieM

(10,578 posts)
41. She wasn't just taken from Oklahoma, she was taken from the Cherokee nation. And I don't believe
Tue Sep 24, 2013, 02:30 PM
Sep 2013

that her adoptive parents love her--they covet her. They loved the idea of parenthood so much that they were willing to take a child away from her biological father. And they knew from the beginning that he wanted her, and did everything they could to facilitate the adoption anyway.

Everyone did not loose. Veronica and her dad lost. The adoptive parents won and the lawyer who made money off the adoption won.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

No winners. MADem Sep 2013 #1
Pretty much every part of the system failed here Recursion Sep 2013 #5
I'm Not Sure RobinA Sep 2013 #6
The system could have succeeded. They could have left Ronnie Brown with her father. StevieM Sep 2013 #36
This is solvable me b zola Sep 2013 #46
Won't happen. The Supreme Court ruled against the father Hardlyaround Sep 2013 #56
Was not at the U.S Supreme Court...only the Oklahoma S.C. n/t JimDandy Sep 2013 #62
U.S. Supreme Court decision. Hardlyaround Sep 2013 #63
The Supreme Court sent the case back to South Carolina courts JimDandy Sep 2013 #65
That poor little girl davepc Sep 2013 #2
i'm not sure i agree with this ruling, it just seems unfair, but the best thing JI7 Sep 2013 #3
If her father was allowed to come get her tomorrow, she would be jumping for joy. StevieM Sep 2013 #142
that capobianco guy kind of creeps me out JI7 Sep 2013 #145
I heard he got a hair cut to make him look more like Dusten Brown (eom) StevieM Sep 2013 #147
These stories are always heartbreaking for everyone involved. Rhiannon12866 Sep 2013 #4
Everyone loses cosmicone Sep 2013 #7
She wasn't just taken from Oklahoma, she was taken from the Cherokee nation. And I don't believe StevieM Sep 2013 #41
That is a bit cynical cosmicone Sep 2013 #49
Veronica's dad wanted to marry the mother and raise the child together. He backed off to give her StevieM Sep 2013 #58
This kind of duplicitous behavior by the adoptive parents JimDandy Sep 2013 #64
While "recovering dead beat dad" totally should get the kid. IdaBriggs Sep 2013 #80
No...a biological father who wants his child absolutely should get his child! JimDandy Sep 2013 #97
The facts do NOT support your assertions. IdaBriggs Sep 2013 #101
He did not opt out. Christy perjured herself. And there is no such thing as a father simply StevieM Sep 2013 #105
The second quote was from him. The text was from him. IdaBriggs Sep 2013 #109
He didn't "want nothing to do with her"....he wanted to MARRY her StevieM Sep 2013 #111
Read the quote. He didn't want to pay child support. IdaBriggs Sep 2013 #113
This is nonsense. He backed off at the behest of the mother. He never intended to leave StevieM Sep 2013 #115
That makes no sense. What would the mother's wishes have to with IdaBriggs Sep 2013 #118
If all of you assertions are true, then why not bring him before a judge, as required by the ICWA? StevieM Sep 2013 #120
You make no sense. IdaBriggs Sep 2013 #124
This is nonsense. He was fighting the adoption immediately. I don't know what you are StevieM Sep 2013 #126
Four months old when the second "final" paperwork was presented. IdaBriggs Sep 2013 #130
We only have Christy's word that she asked child support and he refused. And I am calling her a liar StevieM Sep 2013 #133
He was NOT deployed when she was born so please stop saying that. IdaBriggs Sep 2013 #136
This is ridiculous. He backed off at her request. He never said "I won't pay child support." StevieM Sep 2013 #138
Fact: relinquished rights shortly after born which started the adoption process. IdaBriggs Sep 2013 #141
He didn't understand what he was signing because he was FLAT OUT LIED TO StevieM Sep 2013 #144
You keep making stuff up. You need to educate yourself. IdaBriggs Sep 2013 #149
He did make it known to the mother that he intended to be part of his daughter's life StevieM Sep 2013 #174
She couldn't afford to take care of the child. She had two other children already. LisaL Sep 2013 #121
Well then she could have taken him to court. Or demanded child support. StevieM Sep 2013 #125
The negotiation for her child support went like this: IdaBriggs Sep 2013 #137
That is not what really happened. That is the LIE that Christie has told at the behest of StevieM Sep 2013 #139
Dude, this guy was a sperm donor for all that he was involved. IdaBriggs Sep 2013 #143
That is correct. Everyone else (the mother, the Capobiancos, their lawyer) is lying. StevieM Sep 2013 #146
Everyone else - the mother, the adoptive parents, the lawyer, the guardian ad litem, IdaBriggs Sep 2013 #150
The people you mention are all the proponents of adoption StevieM Sep 2013 #175
Your mind is not influenced by the facts. IdaBriggs Sep 2013 #176
Your mind is closed to reality. StevieM Sep 2013 #177
Ooh! I found more information proving you wrong! IdaBriggs Sep 2013 #178
Thank you for the research you've done. Hardlyaround Sep 2013 #180
Thank you. For some reason this case really moved me. IdaBriggs Sep 2013 #183
First of all, that is the majority opinion in a 3-2 ruling. StevieM Sep 2013 #182
Do you deny he signed away his parental rights shortly after she was born? IdaBriggs Sep 2013 #185
I honestly have to go, I can reply to your comments at a later date, StevieM Sep 2013 #194
Judges can make some truly fucked up rulings. kcr Sep 2013 #193
And his JUNE text messages (she was born in September) - he's a winner! IdaBriggs Sep 2013 #179
That seems to be pretty definitive proof that he didn't want anything to do with baby Veronica. Hardlyaround Sep 2013 #181
He thought he was talking about custody....he was using the words differently than you are StevieM Sep 2013 #184
We *finally* agree - you can't sign your rights away before a child is born. IdaBriggs Sep 2013 #187
Do you have any proof of this, Hardlyaround Sep 2013 #189
Exactly. Why aren't we seeing the texts that's responding to. kcr Sep 2013 #191
Signing those papers was the very LAST step in the process, not the first step. Nine Sep 2013 #186
I think you have that backwards. kcr Sep 2013 #188
This is nonsense. He didn't even know who the Capobiancos were, or that their was StevieM Sep 2013 #190
Speaking from experience, you are 100% correct. Hardlyaround Sep 2013 #192
"The adopters knew IMMEDIATELY that he didn't want it" Nine Sep 2013 #154
^=== This. IdaBriggs Sep 2013 #160
You know, I fully support holding parents to their child support obligtion kcr Sep 2013 #152
The evidence is that it happened like it was supposed to. IdaBriggs Sep 2013 #155
Where, in post 149, does it show it went down that way kcr Sep 2013 #157
The links show the law. IdaBriggs Sep 2013 #158
I'm sorry kcr Sep 2013 #159
The only person saying that is HIM, and he isn't exactly "Mr. Credible." IdaBriggs Sep 2013 #161
That would be the point of doing everything above board, as I said. kcr Sep 2013 #162
A) He relinquished FIRST when she was BORN so the process could start. IdaBriggs Sep 2013 #164
No, I'm not missing anything kcr Sep 2013 #165
SNEAK is a misrepresentation. Being an absentee father (while in the country) IdaBriggs Sep 2013 #167
Well, gee. kcr Sep 2013 #168
In What World erpowers Sep 2013 #117
The texts saying he didn't want to pay child support and was relinquishing IdaBriggs Sep 2013 #119
Not True erpowers Sep 2013 #129
Do you know anyone who gets out of child support? IdaBriggs Sep 2013 #131
Actually, In This World RobinA Sep 2013 #153
Deployed. politicat Sep 2013 #72
The deployment happened AFTER she was born. IdaBriggs Sep 2013 #116
Have you ever deployed? politicat Sep 2013 #135
He knew she was pregnant for nine months. He was not deployed. IdaBriggs Sep 2013 #140
So moving to South Carolina Politicalboi Sep 2013 #53
California would have been better cosmicone Sep 2013 #59
Just Horrible erpowers Sep 2013 #8
How did he want the girl from the beginning? LisaL Sep 2013 #19
Dusten didn't know what he was sigining. StevieM Sep 2013 #42
I didn't know they let people in the services who can't read. IdaBriggs Sep 2013 #81
Well, for someone who didn't want her Blue_Tires Sep 2013 #100
He bailed while the mom was pregnant and the baby wasn't "real" to him. IdaBriggs Sep 2013 #102
Thought He Was Giving Temporary Custody To Child's Mother erpowers Sep 2013 #51
Why would he think he needed to sign the custody over to the mother, considering LisaL Sep 2013 #69
How can you defend the taking of a child from its parent to give it to strangers? me b zola Sep 2013 #74
Are you serious? The self entitled jerk is the guy IdaBriggs Sep 2013 #79
I hadn't been following this case. Nine Sep 2013 #89
In the NPR story, there is a line from him that just fills me with RAGE: IdaBriggs Sep 2013 #90
That fills you with rage? Really? kcr Sep 2013 #163
Yes, there are many dead beats out there, and many men who seek to avoid child support. IdaBriggs Sep 2013 #166
A deadbeat dad, in the sense that they don't want to pay child support kcr Sep 2013 #169
Ah. Much explained. "Whatever." IdaBriggs Sep 2013 #170
It's not how I was raised. It's the law. kcr Sep 2013 #171
It is also how you were raised to find inappropriate behavior acceptable. IdaBriggs Sep 2013 #172
More explained. Your jumping to conclusions and thinking you know everything about people kcr Sep 2013 #173
Exactly. They we DESPERATE for her. Dusten just plain loves his daughter. And he tried to work StevieM Sep 2013 #104
They were engaged before the pregnancy. The relationship ended. IdaBriggs Sep 2013 #114
From my point of view it is not "oh the poor man"... me b zola Sep 2013 #196
His Plan erpowers Sep 2013 #76
Except he made no child support arrangements or anything else IdaBriggs Sep 2013 #78
Disagree. He gave up custody. IdaBriggs Sep 2013 #77
Thought He Was Giving Custody To Child's Mother erpowers Sep 2013 #85
He was told "pay child support or give up custody." IdaBriggs Sep 2013 #86
Other Posts erpowers Sep 2013 #123
Look up what "deadbeat" dad means. LisaL Sep 2013 #127
"Dead Beat Dad" traditionally means someone who does not pay child support. IdaBriggs Sep 2013 #128
Well said. (nt) Nine Sep 2013 #134
Tragic me b zola Sep 2013 #9
I hope you don't mean all adoptive parents LibertyLover Sep 2013 #11
What if you were to find out that the child was not abandoned... me b zola Sep 2013 #12
Interesting. AtheistCrusader Sep 2013 #14
This is why I keep doors open and don't use ignore me b zola Sep 2013 #15
The facts of the case appear very much in your favor. AtheistCrusader Sep 2013 #17
Agreed that this is not about you or I (adoptive parent v adoptee) winning or losing me b zola Sep 2013 #195
No worries. AtheistCrusader Sep 2013 #199
It is a sickness in our society, made all the worse by the fact that most people don't realize StevieM Sep 2013 #37
Here's an open letter from a blogger that cuts to the core: me b zola Sep 2013 #10
Our adoption laws need to change to recognize the rights of both biological parents. Sunlei Sep 2013 #13
It does, which is surprising in this case. AtheistCrusader Sep 2013 #16
Injustice. Sunlei Sep 2013 #18
Native Americans? The child only has 1.2 % of Native American blood, while the father has 2.4%. LisaL Sep 2013 #20
This message was self-deleted by its author Sunlei Sep 2013 #21
You tell me. LisaL Sep 2013 #22
This message was self-deleted by its author Sunlei Sep 2013 #23
1 % isn't anywhere near a "100 pure." LisaL Sep 2013 #24
This message was self-deleted by its author Sunlei Sep 2013 #30
Here is what DU poster ex-cop law student said in a previous thread: StevieM Sep 2013 #34
What is it to you the amount of Native American Blood that the girl has? me b zola Sep 2013 #43
Biological parent doesn't have forever to change his/her mind after relinquishing parental rights. LisaL Sep 2013 #25
He contested it immediately. AtheistCrusader Sep 2013 #26
Got a link for that? LisaL Sep 2013 #27
The media is mis-reporting what happened. Dusten was deliberately tricked into signing something StevieM Sep 2013 #32
Is there any proof of this? penultimate Sep 2013 #66
Is this misrepresented? IdaBriggs Sep 2013 #82
Finding of facts. AtheistCrusader Sep 2013 #39
He never wanted the adoption--and the prospective adoptive parents knew it (eom) StevieM Sep 2013 #29
I understand that he expected that after he relinquishes his parental right, child's mother LisaL Sep 2013 #31
He didn't intend to leave his daughter's life. He was trying to back off and not make the StevieM Sep 2013 #33
Parental rights cannot be relinquished unless there are other parents Sheldon Cooper Sep 2013 #38
This is Incorrect RobinA Sep 2013 #47
To the extent that you've been declared an unfit parent, then yes, your rights can be relinquished Sheldon Cooper Sep 2013 #54
And what about the needs of the child? me b zola Sep 2013 #44
The Needs of the Child RobinA Sep 2013 #48
As an adult adoptee I will tell you me b zola Sep 2013 #50
Let me continue by saying how offensive your post was me b zola Sep 2013 #52
I find *your* tone offensive actually Nine Sep 2013 #57
Again..offensive me b zola Sep 2013 #61
I'm adopted too Dorian Gray Sep 2013 #67
How sad for you me b zola Sep 2013 #68
The first post Dorian Gray Sep 2013 #71
Why do you continually talk about adoptive parents and adoptees in adversarial terms? Nine Sep 2013 #70
In order for the wonderful adoptive family to be formed, first another family has to be broken up. StevieM Sep 2013 #73
Is that how you think it works? Nine Sep 2013 #75
Yes, supply and demand me b zola Sep 2013 #92
In what way are adoptees and first parents preyed upon and taken advantage of? Nine Sep 2013 #94
I was never preyed upon Dorian Gray Sep 2013 #95
Myself and my siblings weren't preyed upon by our adoptive parents, Hardlyaround Sep 2013 #96
It is remarkable that we have actually turned children into commodoties (eom) StevieM Sep 2013 #106
Yes, quite often that is how it works (eom) StevieM Sep 2013 #107
Wow. You are being so insensitive to every adoptive parent on here. (nt) Nine Sep 2013 #108
This entire country is insensitive to the pain of birth parents StevieM Sep 2013 #110
Not only insensitive to adopted parents Dorian Gray Sep 2013 #148
Wrong RobinA Sep 2013 #156
If that is true then why a gazillion FB pages devoted to convincing women to give up their children? me b zola Sep 2013 #198
I'm Afraid RobinA Sep 2013 #151
The emphasis should always be on keeping families intact me b zola Sep 2013 #197
Actually, they did plenty of lying themselves. They deliberately misspelled Dusten's name, StevieM Sep 2013 #28
This is sad. bravenak Sep 2013 #35
+100 million gazillion me b zola Sep 2013 #45
so true. i know i would. a biological tie is a very very strong bond La Lioness Priyanka Sep 2013 #60
Poor Veronica. To be shuttled back and forth question everything Sep 2013 #40
It's a travesty of justice. Tien1985 Sep 2013 #55
It really isn't. IdaBriggs Sep 2013 #83
According to their side Tien1985 Sep 2013 #87
Which time? The first time or the second? IdaBriggs Sep 2013 #88
He did NOT know what he was signing. Yes, he was naive, but he never agreed to his daughter being StevieM Sep 2013 #103
He wanted to support her until the relationship ended. IdaBriggs Sep 2013 #112
The father gave up custody. Twice. - lynne Sep 2013 #84
But he's a Native American, so all dice must come up in his favor. Dreamer Tatum Sep 2013 #91
If reports are right, he's approximately 2% Native American - lynne Sep 2013 #98
Ideally they should all agree to get along arikara Sep 2013 #93
How is it that Veronica had been living with her adoptive parents for four months... Nine Sep 2013 #99
Exactly. LisaL Sep 2013 #122
He wasn't involved and he wasn't deployed. IdaBriggs Sep 2013 #132
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Biological dad returns 4-...»Reply #41