Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Latest Breaking News
In reply to the discussion: Biological dad returns 4-year-old Veronica to adoptive parents [View all]StevieM
(10,578 posts)41. She wasn't just taken from Oklahoma, she was taken from the Cherokee nation. And I don't believe
that her adoptive parents love her--they covet her. They loved the idea of parenthood so much that they were willing to take a child away from her biological father. And they knew from the beginning that he wanted her, and did everything they could to facilitate the adoption anyway.
Everyone did not loose. Veronica and her dad lost. The adoptive parents won and the lawyer who made money off the adoption won.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
199 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
The system could have succeeded. They could have left Ronnie Brown with her father.
StevieM
Sep 2013
#36
If her father was allowed to come get her tomorrow, she would be jumping for joy.
StevieM
Sep 2013
#142
She wasn't just taken from Oklahoma, she was taken from the Cherokee nation. And I don't believe
StevieM
Sep 2013
#41
Veronica's dad wanted to marry the mother and raise the child together. He backed off to give her
StevieM
Sep 2013
#58
He did not opt out. Christy perjured herself. And there is no such thing as a father simply
StevieM
Sep 2013
#105
This is nonsense. He backed off at the behest of the mother. He never intended to leave
StevieM
Sep 2013
#115
If all of you assertions are true, then why not bring him before a judge, as required by the ICWA?
StevieM
Sep 2013
#120
This is nonsense. He was fighting the adoption immediately. I don't know what you are
StevieM
Sep 2013
#126
We only have Christy's word that she asked child support and he refused. And I am calling her a liar
StevieM
Sep 2013
#133
This is ridiculous. He backed off at her request. He never said "I won't pay child support."
StevieM
Sep 2013
#138
Fact: relinquished rights shortly after born which started the adoption process.
IdaBriggs
Sep 2013
#141
He did make it known to the mother that he intended to be part of his daughter's life
StevieM
Sep 2013
#174
She couldn't afford to take care of the child. She had two other children already.
LisaL
Sep 2013
#121
That is not what really happened. That is the LIE that Christie has told at the behest of
StevieM
Sep 2013
#139
That is correct. Everyone else (the mother, the Capobiancos, their lawyer) is lying.
StevieM
Sep 2013
#146
Everyone else - the mother, the adoptive parents, the lawyer, the guardian ad litem,
IdaBriggs
Sep 2013
#150
That seems to be pretty definitive proof that he didn't want anything to do with baby Veronica.
Hardlyaround
Sep 2013
#181
He thought he was talking about custody....he was using the words differently than you are
StevieM
Sep 2013
#184
We *finally* agree - you can't sign your rights away before a child is born.
IdaBriggs
Sep 2013
#187
This is nonsense. He didn't even know who the Capobiancos were, or that their was
StevieM
Sep 2013
#190
SNEAK is a misrepresentation. Being an absentee father (while in the country)
IdaBriggs
Sep 2013
#167
How can you defend the taking of a child from its parent to give it to strangers?
me b zola
Sep 2013
#74
Yes, there are many dead beats out there, and many men who seek to avoid child support.
IdaBriggs
Sep 2013
#166
More explained. Your jumping to conclusions and thinking you know everything about people
kcr
Sep 2013
#173
Exactly. They we DESPERATE for her. Dusten just plain loves his daughter. And he tried to work
StevieM
Sep 2013
#104
Agreed that this is not about you or I (adoptive parent v adoptee) winning or losing
me b zola
Sep 2013
#195
It is a sickness in our society, made all the worse by the fact that most people don't realize
StevieM
Sep 2013
#37
Our adoption laws need to change to recognize the rights of both biological parents.
Sunlei
Sep 2013
#13
Native Americans? The child only has 1.2 % of Native American blood, while the father has 2.4%.
LisaL
Sep 2013
#20
Biological parent doesn't have forever to change his/her mind after relinquishing parental rights.
LisaL
Sep 2013
#25
The media is mis-reporting what happened. Dusten was deliberately tricked into signing something
StevieM
Sep 2013
#32
He never wanted the adoption--and the prospective adoptive parents knew it (eom)
StevieM
Sep 2013
#29
I understand that he expected that after he relinquishes his parental right, child's mother
LisaL
Sep 2013
#31
He didn't intend to leave his daughter's life. He was trying to back off and not make the
StevieM
Sep 2013
#33
To the extent that you've been declared an unfit parent, then yes, your rights can be relinquished
Sheldon Cooper
Sep 2013
#54
Why do you continually talk about adoptive parents and adoptees in adversarial terms?
Nine
Sep 2013
#70
In order for the wonderful adoptive family to be formed, first another family has to be broken up.
StevieM
Sep 2013
#73
If that is true then why a gazillion FB pages devoted to convincing women to give up their children?
me b zola
Sep 2013
#198
Actually, they did plenty of lying themselves. They deliberately misspelled Dusten's name,
StevieM
Sep 2013
#28
so true. i know i would. a biological tie is a very very strong bond
La Lioness Priyanka
Sep 2013
#60
He did NOT know what he was signing. Yes, he was naive, but he never agreed to his daughter being
StevieM
Sep 2013
#103