Latest Breaking News

former9thward

(33,424 posts)

96. It is still tied to employment.

Reply to Liberal_Stalwart71 (Reply #94)

Fri Sep 27, 2013, 05:12 PM

Sep 2013

If your employer offers health insurance you are not eligible for the exchanges.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

133 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

UPS to drop 15,000 spouses from insurance, cites ObamaCare [View all] OhioChick Aug 2013 OP

corporate propaganda nt geek tragedy Aug 2013 #1

Whether it's "propaganda" or not. ForgoTheConsequence Aug 2013 #2

They'll be eligible for state exchanges. geek tragedy Aug 2013 #7

True. But this isn't being communicated. ForgoTheConsequence Aug 2013 #8

The government can't prohibit UPS from issuing a press release. nt geek tragedy Aug 2013 #10

That's not the point I'm making! ForgoTheConsequence Aug 2013 #12

The administration is pushing it in social media etc. geek tragedy Aug 2013 #15

Barely. ForgoTheConsequence Aug 2013 #17

Why aren't you HELPING then, instead of just criticizing kristopher Aug 2013 #25

You have no idea what I do. ForgoTheConsequence Aug 2013 #30

I see what you are doing here and it AIN'T GOOD. kristopher Aug 2013 #33

Oh, come of it. ForgoTheConsequence Aug 2013 #35

You are doing nothing but spreading FUD. kristopher Aug 2013 #46

Uh huh. ForgoTheConsequence Aug 2013 #47

None of those things justify your behavior. kristopher Aug 2013 #48

How are you not getting this? ForgoTheConsequence Aug 2013 #49

No, you are spreading it here under the PRETEXT of calling for action kristopher Aug 2013 #51

HAHAHA. ForgoTheConsequence Aug 2013 #52

I'm fine. kristopher Aug 2013 #54

You're not fine. ForgoTheConsequence Aug 2013 #57

Kristopher, you sound like a false flag disruptor to me. n/t Psephos Sep 2013 #95

you heaven05 Aug 2013 #68

Oh God, get the hell off it TekGryphon Aug 2013 #73

The president is everywhere spitting out a spleen, traveling all over the country Liberal_Stalwart71 Sep 2013 #98

Yes, why are you not doing...well...uh...uh.... Safetykitten Aug 2013 #42

How you're being accused of being a "concern troll" or a "plant"... TekGryphon Aug 2013 #74

Thanks. ForgoTheConsequence Aug 2013 #77

Who controls the media? All I see are Republicans everywhere. What if the Dems Liberal_Stalwart71 Sep 2013 #99

I agree gopiscrap Aug 2013 #28

They do have a media blitz treestar Sep 2013 #114

If people actually read the press release and the news story they wouldn't think that hack89 Aug 2013 #16

There is a reason the sponse is on the UPS plan. former9thward Nov 2013 #124

Quite possibly because the very people who should be communicating this... LanternWaste Aug 2013 #66

Was that a swipe at me? ForgoTheConsequence Aug 2013 #80

"because they are eligible for coverage elsewhere." jberryhill Sep 2013 #103

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^Here's the answer, kids. This is a NON ISSUE. Squinch Sep 2013 #109

We had two previous threads on this bullshit jberryhill Sep 2013 #110

The employer mandates have been waived. former9thward Nov 2013 #125

UPS was a corporate sponser of the Contract on America, they shield taxes in Bermuda, UPSPAC one of mikekohr Nov 2013 #130

Didn't the President specifically promise words to the effect that that everyone could keep 24601 Aug 2013 #84

He didn't promise that everyone's employer wouldn't screw them. nt geek tragedy Aug 2013 #89

They'll be eligible for their employer's insurance jberryhill Sep 2013 #102

You are absolutely correct.. FarPoint Sep 2013 #108

They should not need to go to state exchanges justamama83 Nov 2013 #129

welcome to DU gopiscrap Nov 2013 #132

"15,000 working spouses eligible for coverage by their own employers" hack89 Aug 2013 #11

The problem is that this will cost families money. blackspade Aug 2013 #59

truefact - if my hubs fortune 500 employer forces me on my 40-person employers plan elehhhhna Sep 2013 #111

I would think that they already have it through their own companies notadmblnd Aug 2013 #67

Oh no...how could that be? Don't they know it's *fill in company* fault. Safetykitten Aug 2013 #39

Oh FFS. JTFrog Aug 2013 #90

Please learn about Obamacare. Learn about the law, then complain Liberal_Stalwart71 Sep 2013 #94

It is still tied to employment. former9thward Sep 2013 #96

WRONG!!! No!! You can go on the exchanges YOURSELF and buy your own Liberal_Stalwart71 Sep 2013 #97

You aren't eligible for the tax credit. former9thward Sep 2013 #100

You can use the subsidies to buy insurance. It's not tied to whether you are employed or not. Liberal_Stalwart71 Sep 2013 #115

It says because they are eligible for other coverage XRubicon Nov 2013 #123

put your head up your ass and you will think differently, Forgo Skittles Nov 2013 #127

You got that right! rdharma Aug 2013 #9

And it will be only UPS that will do this. Yes indeedy, only them. Safetykitten Aug 2013 #40

traditional employer coverage was over long ago. Hubby's private job makes added family to pay full SugarShack Sep 2013 #105

You sure you will be eligible for a subsidy? antigop Sep 2013 #106

People should get together and find ways to sue. murielm99 Aug 2013 #3

Nobody is losing insurance here hack89 Aug 2013 #13

So hubby/wife working there gets it, now go find your family stuff elsewhere and by the way... Safetykitten Aug 2013 #41

"The health law requires large employers to cover employees and dependent children" hack89 Aug 2013 #43

Dude, what is your fucking point? tridim Aug 2013 #55

ok.... moonlady0623 Aug 2013 #61

We're a great, wealthy and powerful nation. marsis Aug 2013 #21

The National Economic and Social Rights Initiative, murielm99 Aug 2013 #24

That's all very nice and feel good but it's not remotely practical moonlady0623 Aug 2013 #63

I for one feel that Universal Health Care is a right gopiscrap Aug 2013 #31

Just curious, moonlady0623 Aug 2013 #69

+1000 DeSwiss Aug 2013 #85

Yes, the Road to Hell warrant46 Nov 2013 #128

Sue UPS for what? branford Aug 2013 #36

Fortunately, ObamaCare will be able to pick up the slack. NYC_SKP Aug 2013 #4

Message auto-removed Name removed Aug 2013 #38

Wife worked for FedEx. NYC_SKP Aug 2013 #45

"people would likely quit" Highly unlikely In today's job marke, or for the next decadet. n/t jtuck004 Aug 2013 #50

The spouses employers will "pick up the slack" hack89 Aug 2013 #44

And repugs are cheering. louis-t Aug 2013 #5

Seriously? I thought UPS were all Teamsters? Blue_Tires Aug 2013 #6

I think that means Cryptoad Aug 2013 #14

Maybe they're seeing the Individual Rates? Treant Aug 2013 #19

Yea,,,,I think ACA Cryptoad Aug 2013 #34

Fucking business assholes shouldn't be allowed to do this gopiscrap Aug 2013 #18

Fugging REPUBLICAN business a-holes! rdharma Aug 2013 #20

Yup I knew that gopiscrap Aug 2013 #27

This is a signal DissidentVoice Aug 2013 #22

Single Payer is not Obama Care. RC Sep 2013 #113

Bollocks! DissidentVoice Sep 2013 #120

Can't expect UPS to cover Med Insurance AND destroy USPS at the same time... Blue State Bandit Aug 2013 #23

I was thinking the same thing. rdharma Aug 2013 #29

UPS on ALEC Board of Directors rdharma Aug 2013 #26

UPS managment are lying sacks of shit. blackspade Aug 2013 #32

Lies! All Lies! Safetykitten Aug 2013 #37

Time for UPS employees to decide on a strike DreamGypsy Aug 2013 #53

Our state insurance plan did this quite awhile ago. woodsprite Aug 2013 #56

This is exactly why ACA will help American businesses mainer Aug 2013 #58

Article points out it applies only to non-union employees ** LannyDeVaney Aug 2013 #60

And these are the *holes the GOP wants to sell the US Postal Service to.... Hekate Aug 2013 #62

Typical DallasNE Aug 2013 #64

Something On The Rate Of Increase Slowing DallasNE Aug 2013 #87

Well, then UPS just lost all my business. cliffordu Aug 2013 #65

+1 nt No Vested Interest Aug 2013 #70

+2 Fearless Aug 2013 #71

Dropping Spouses With Insurance Elsewhere is Not A New Strategy Indykatie Aug 2013 #72

Just curious Rebl Aug 2013 #78

In this specific situation the question is largely moot though cstanleytech Aug 2013 #82

"because they are eligible for coverage elsewhere." jberryhill Sep 2013 #104

... BeyondGeography Aug 2013 #75

insurance company imperialism ... quadrature Aug 2013 #76

Union workers aren't included in this Omaha Steve Aug 2013 #79

.... DeSwiss Aug 2013 #86

+++THIS++++ nt antigop Sep 2013 #107

I loved the teamsters when I worked at UPS CFLDem Nov 2013 #133

Another transparent corporate lie. They did it for more profits. Plain and simple. truthisfreedom Aug 2013 #81

" They did it for more profits" Well dohhhhh. cstanleytech Aug 2013 #83

If Obamacare erodes employee insurance the fix is single payer. Kablooie Aug 2013 #88

Kick! sarcasmo Aug 2013 #91

UPS lies Loge23 Aug 2013 #92

Message auto-removed Name removed Sep 2013 #93

It should be shouted on the rooftops that this has little Still Sensible Sep 2013 #101

I don't know what the whole story is but I assume the ACA has backup seveneyes Sep 2013 #112

Cousin works for UPS...our family uses the USPS over them. Works just as well and cheaper. kelliekat44 Sep 2013 #116

Bullshit. UPS was going to do this anyway. Brigid Sep 2013 #117

What is the relevant ACA provision that would call for such a move? alcibiades_mystery Sep 2013 #118

Good. This is how it should be ... JustABozoOnThisBus Sep 2013 #119

I can't understand why some eloquent Democrat...or 2 or 3 of them...don't contact Harry Reid and libdem4life Sep 2013 #121

If you're going to make an omelet, you have to break a few eggs. Pterodactyl Nov 2013 #122

boycott UPS olddad56 Nov 2013 #126

UPS was a corporate sponser of the Contract on America, they shield taxes in Bermuda, UPSPAC one of mikekohr Nov 2013 #131