Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Latest Breaking News

Showing Original Post only (View all)

kpete

(72,904 posts)
Sat Sep 28, 2013, 03:20 PM Sep 2013

N.S.A. Examines Social Networks of U.S. Citizens (Decision Made In Secret 2010) [View all]

Source: New York TImes

N.S.A. Examines Social Networks of U.S. Citizens
By JAMES RISEN and LAURA POITRAS
New York Times
September 28, 2013 12:10PM (EDT

. . . the decision to revise the limits concerning Americans was made in secret, without review by the nation’s intelligence court or any public debate.



WASHINGTON — Since 2010, the National Security Agency has been exploiting its huge collections of data to create sophisticated graphs of some Americans’ social connections that can identify their associates, their locations at certain times, their traveling companions and other personal information, according to newly disclosed documents and interviews with officials.

This slide from an N.S.A. PowerPoint presentation shows one of the ways the agency uses e-mail and phone data to analyze the relationships of foreign intelligence targets.


The spy agency began allowing the analysis of phone call and e-mail logs in November 2010 to examine Americans’ networks of associations for foreign intelligence purposes after N.S.A. officials lifted restrictions on the practice, according to documents provided by Edward J. Snowden, the former N.S.A. contractor.

The policy shift was intended to help the agency “discover and track” connections between intelligence targets overseas and people in the United States, according to an N.S.A. memorandum from January 2011. The agency was authorized to conduct “large-scale graph analysis on very large sets of communications metadata without having to check foreignness” of every e-mail address, phone number or other identifier, the document said. Because of concerns about infringing on the privacy of American citizens, the computer analysis of such data had previously been permitted only for foreigners.

The agency can augment the communications data with material from public, commercial and other sources, including bank codes, insurance information, Facebook profiles, passenger manifests, voter registration rolls and GPS location information, as well as property records and unspecified tax data, according to the documents. They do not indicate any restrictions on the use of such “enrichment” data, and several former senior Obama administration officials said the agency drew on it for both Americans and foreigners.

Read more: http://www.nytimes.com/2013/09/29/us/nsa-examines-social-networks-of-us-citizens.html?src=twrhp&_r=0



UPDATED TO ADD THIS LITTLE GEM:

note that the NYT says that analysts could trace Americans " as long as they cited a foreign intelligence justification.". Cited, not 'demonstrated' or 'proved'


N.S.A. analysts were told that they could trace the contacts of Americans as long as they cited a foreign intelligence justification. That could include anything from ties to terrorism, weapons proliferation or international drug smuggling to spying on conversations of foreign politicians, business figures or activists.

http://www.nytimes.com/2013/09/29/us/nsa-examines-social-networks-of-us-citizens.html?pagewanted=3&utm_medium=twitter&_r=0&partner=rssnyt&emc=rss
41 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
and yet they couldn't stop the Boston bombers. nt grasswire Sep 2013 #1
reading the whole thing: kpete Sep 2013 #2
the comments are interesting grasswire Sep 2013 #3
Love this exception: "or there is evidence of a crime." So much for Title III warrant requirements - leveymg Sep 2013 #5
yea ordinary crime questionseverything Sep 2013 #36
Last two paragraphs Red Oak Sep 2013 #6
Of course not. The CIA was "ontop" of them, just like the 9/11 hijackers and '93 WTC bombers before leveymg Sep 2013 #7
doesn't that mean the NSA is expendable, then? nt grasswire Sep 2013 #8
It means that we're all expendable, if the CIA and the WH think that's necessary. leveymg Sep 2013 #9
Could not have said it better... dixiegrrrrl Sep 2013 #14
That's the thing about amassing all this information - they can only work backwards, djean111 Sep 2013 #28
Yep, they are everywhere and will continue to be, maybe some should spend time and effort in Thinkingabout Sep 2013 #4
Well, yes The Green Manalishi Sep 2013 #15
One should be albe to figure out what is being done by the analysts but be that as it may be Thinkingabout Sep 2013 #16
The Patriot Act uses broad, vague uncertain language to define JDPriestly Sep 2013 #18
Or terrorist could be those who attempt to scare the crap out of those paranoid about Thinkingabout Sep 2013 #20
People should be scared of the NSA program of surveillance. JDPriestly Sep 2013 #23
I don't know the number of paranoid spy people who is scaring the crap out of those who listen to Thinkingabout Sep 2013 #24
I asked you to please tell me what percentage of Americans you believe are terrorists JDPriestly Sep 2013 #33
By your definition most people are terrorist as you say a terrorist can be someone in disagreement Thinkingabout Sep 2013 #37
I do not agree with defining terrorism as anyone who disagrees with me or others. JDPriestly Sep 2013 #38
Then you are disagreeing with your earlier post. I disagree with your opinion of NSA so Thinkingabout Sep 2013 #39
I am saying that the NSA definition of terrorism if taken from the Patriot Act could stretch to JDPriestly Sep 2013 #40
Do you think the soft target attack occurred in Nairobi? Do you think there was a bombing Thinkingabout Sep 2013 #41
Does "citing a foreign intelligence justification" include planning a trip outwith the USA? mwooldri Sep 2013 #10
Or Mister Smith bought a bag of pot... Hubert Flottz Sep 2013 #13
It just goes to show you... Hubert Flottz Sep 2013 #11
The stories of your extra girl friends seem to come to the surface long before the NSA was created. Thinkingabout Sep 2013 #17
It is worse than the KGB because it is less apparent JDPriestly Sep 2013 #19
Kicked and recommended. Uncle Joe Sep 2013 #12
The article mentions facebook profiles so does this mean facebook gave the government a backdoor cstanleytech Sep 2013 #21
Another demonstration of NSA idiocy and waste. Pholus Sep 2013 #22
Excellent post! Of course that is what it is really about. JDPriestly Sep 2013 #34
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA! OnyxCollie Sep 2013 #25
Looks like the NYT is finally making use of Snowden's materials. dkf Sep 2013 #26
K and R nt Mojorabbit Sep 2013 #27
Damn you Times, just when I am done with you... JackRiddler Sep 2013 #29
Change You Can BeLIEve In! blkmusclmachine Sep 2013 #30
This is why it's #%^*ing crazy to participate in Facebook MannyGoldstein Sep 2013 #31
^^^This^^^ Egnever Sep 2013 #32
True. This is about the only website I post on other than e-mail. JDPriestly Sep 2013 #35
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»N.S.A. Examines Social Ne...