Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

COLGATE4

(14,886 posts)
17. Talk about a non sequitur - prior to Chavez'
Wed Oct 2, 2013, 08:43 AM
Oct 2013

Last edited Wed Oct 2, 2013, 02:35 PM - Edit history (1)

election the Venezuelan government was working hard on overhauling the Electric sector of the country, precisely because their studies showed the increasing demand that was coming to an already outdated electric generation and distribution system. However once Chavez took power all these reforms were thrown out. In fact, the first great success of the prior government (improving electric service for the Venezuelan people - not your imaginary 1%) was Margarita Island where system capacity and reliability was increased dramatically. But this was abruptly done away with when Chavez nationalized it shortly after taking power. The other proposed reforms were likewise scrapped.

Since then the electric sector in Venezuela, already starting to be in crisis at the time Chavez rode in, has only continued to deteriorate. It cannot keep up with ever-increasing demand and, in addition, the large capital investment needed to keep machinery 50 years old in some cases functioning just isn't happening. Thus, the present situation of rolling blackouts and outages which Maduro, displaying his infinite wisdom and technological expertise, tries to blame on 'sabotage'.

Chavez' and Maduros' elections were in no way a referendum on the public's satisfaction with a lousy electric sector. In fact this current lack of dependability of electric power is a factor which will only serve to bring more discontent with Maduro's government. And all the cheap demagoguery won't do anything to improve that. Blaming the famous "1%" for their own ineptitude doesn't convince anyone.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Yeah, nothing is the fault of Maduro and his cronies... Archae Oct 2013 #1
That's what Jacobo Arbenz said. Octafish Oct 2013 #16
Cover-up revealed! Obama was behind 1954 overthrow of Guatemalan government! struggle4progress Oct 2013 #21
Ha ha. It is to laugh at fascism. Like the time Hillary helped Honduras out of democracy. Octafish Oct 2013 #25
"We believe that the coup was not legal and that President Zelaya remains the president of Honduras, struggle4progress Oct 2013 #27
Interesting. Must explain why Aristide got the Treatment. Octafish Oct 2013 #28
Did you support 1994 Clinton's re-instatement of Aristide after the 1991 coup, or did you also struggle4progress Oct 2013 #29
I spoke to Aristide about it when Bush oversaw the overthrow in 1991. Octafish Oct 2013 #30
Obama also tried to give cancer to Chavez and personally disrupted the power grid. jzodda Oct 2013 #26
Do not distract with your strawman. JackRiddler Oct 2013 #34
Why weren't they arrested? joshcryer Oct 2013 #2
Diplomatic immunity. n/t DeSwiss Oct 2013 #4
For sabotage? A waiver request should've been made. joshcryer Oct 2013 #5
For evidence, contact the NSA. :-/ n/t DeSwiss Oct 2013 #6
It's been tried. joshcryer Oct 2013 #7
It's all posturing. Every bit, by everyone involved..... :-) n/t DeSwiss Oct 2013 #11
Venzuela isn't OUR enemy, but they are the enemy of the 1% capitalists inch4progress Oct 2013 #3
State Dept does interfere in the affairs of Venezuela for the benefit of US capitalists. SDjack Oct 2013 #8
Wins first prize for Naivete of the Week nt COLGATE4 Oct 2013 #9
Yuppers. Did you see Oliver Stone's "South of the Border"? Great movie! inch4progress Oct 2013 #13
Yep. The Chavez/Maduro government's policy of COLGATE4 Oct 2013 #10
If what you were saying was true, and not straight from 1% owned media, inch4progress Oct 2013 #14
Talk about a non sequitur - prior to Chavez' COLGATE4 Oct 2013 #17
Please identify the disconnet in my conclusion that people aren't going to inch4progress Oct 2013 #19
How about responding to what I posted? COLGATE4 Oct 2013 #31
People vote according to need and expectation. If they had problems under chavez with such a basic inch4progress Oct 2013 #33
Please tell me about your expertise in COLGATE4 Oct 2013 #38
He's claiming the US sabotaged their power grid? Cali_Democrat Oct 2013 #12
Not to say he is right, but, giving someone cancer isn't all that difficult. inch4progress Oct 2013 #15
Yup. Obviously our Charge d'Affairs encouraged saboteurs to vandalize a metal grille struggle4progress Oct 2013 #23
Did the "United States" strangle on its tongue (in-cheek) when it rejected it? Peace Patriot Oct 2013 #18
RE-destablize, what is this like the millionth time we have meddled in their affairs? inch4progress Oct 2013 #20
Do you have any actual reason to think the current administration is doing that? struggle4progress Oct 2013 #24
Imperialism is largely independent of "administrations" JackRiddler Oct 2013 #35
Buzzwords and sloganeering are no substitute to detailed analysis of concrete facts struggle4progress Oct 2013 #37
How many DUer's enjoyed Netanyahu's endorsement of Romney? Ash_F Oct 2013 #22
Pretty much. JackRiddler Oct 2013 #36
What a wank fest! n/t bitchkitty Oct 2013 #32
Message auto-removed Name removed Oct 2013 #39
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Maduro: No cordial talks ...»Reply #17