Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Latest Breaking News
In reply to the discussion: Israeli court rejects Israeli nationality status [View all]happyslug
(14,779 posts)6. That was Tandy's Ruling in Dred Scott
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dred_Scott
Now, the Dred Scott decision is one of the most divisive decisions ever issued,
More on US Supreme Court Chief Justice Roger B. Taney:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Roger_B._Taney
Dred Scott case including lower court rulings:
http://digital.wustl.edu/d/dre/browse.html
Six concurring opinions, Two Dissenting opinions, in addition to Tandy's decsion (Join by only two other Justices out of the then 10 Justices).
Tandy's decision:
http://digital.wustl.edu/cgi/t/text/text-idx?c=dre;cc=dre;view=text;idno=dre1857.0105.108;rgn=div1;node=dre1857.0105.108%3A1
In the opinion of the court, the legislation and histories of the times, and the language used in the Declaration of Independence, show, that neither the class of persons who had been imported as slaves, nor their descendants, whether they had become free or not, were then acknowledged as a part of the people, nor intended to be included in the general words used in that memorable instrument.
It is difficult at this day to realize the state of public opinion in relation to that unfortunate race, which prevailed in the civilized and enlightened portions of the world at the time of the Declaration of Independence, and when the Constitution of the United States was framed and adopted. But the public history of every European nation displays it in a manner too plain to be mistaken.
They had for more than a century before been regarded as beings of an inferior order, and altogether unfit to associate with the white race, either in social or political relations; and so far inferior, that they had no rights which the white man was bound to respect; and that the negro might justly and lawfully be reduced to slavery for his benefit. He was bought and sold, and treated as an ordinary article of merchandise and traffic, whenever a profit could be made by it. This opinion was at that time fixed and universal in the civilized portion of the white race. It was regarded as an axiom in morals as well as in politics, which no one thought of disputing, or supposed to be open to dispute; and men in every grade and position in society daily and habitually acted upon it in their private pursuits, as well as in matters of public concern, without doubting for a moment the correctness of this opinion.
Now, the Dred Scott decision is one of the most divisive decisions ever issued,
More on US Supreme Court Chief Justice Roger B. Taney:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Roger_B._Taney
Dred Scott case including lower court rulings:
http://digital.wustl.edu/d/dre/browse.html
Six concurring opinions, Two Dissenting opinions, in addition to Tandy's decsion (Join by only two other Justices out of the then 10 Justices).
Tandy's decision:
http://digital.wustl.edu/cgi/t/text/text-idx?c=dre;cc=dre;view=text;idno=dre1857.0105.108;rgn=div1;node=dre1857.0105.108%3A1
In the opinion of the court, the legislation and histories of the times, and the language used in the Declaration of Independence, show, that neither the class of persons who had been imported as slaves, nor their descendants, whether they had become free or not, were then acknowledged as a part of the people, nor intended to be included in the general words used in that memorable instrument.
It is difficult at this day to realize the state of public opinion in relation to that unfortunate race, which prevailed in the civilized and enlightened portions of the world at the time of the Declaration of Independence, and when the Constitution of the United States was framed and adopted. But the public history of every European nation displays it in a manner too plain to be mistaken.
They had for more than a century before been regarded as beings of an inferior order, and altogether unfit to associate with the white race, either in social or political relations; and so far inferior, that they had no rights which the white man was bound to respect; and that the negro might justly and lawfully be reduced to slavery for his benefit. He was bought and sold, and treated as an ordinary article of merchandise and traffic, whenever a profit could be made by it. This opinion was at that time fixed and universal in the civilized portion of the white race. It was regarded as an axiom in morals as well as in politics, which no one thought of disputing, or supposed to be open to dispute; and men in every grade and position in society daily and habitually acted upon it in their private pursuits, as well as in matters of public concern, without doubting for a moment the correctness of this opinion.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
32 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
A sanctuary for the Jewish people who were dispersed after the destruction of the temple
JDPriestly
Oct 2013
#10
Israel was established as a sanctuary for Jews. And people hate Jews, therefore they hate
JDPriestly
Oct 2013
#15
Let's hope current plans to negotiate peace between Palestiinians and Israel are productive
JDPriestly
Oct 2013
#26
Not a good analogy - just note our President - elected in a landslide - is not in the dominant group
karynnj
Oct 2013
#4