Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

sofa king

(10,857 posts)
15. Good points.
Mon Feb 27, 2012, 01:27 PM
Feb 2012

It occurs to me that since the F-35 is already semi-autonomous itself, with fly-by-wire inputs and onboard systems already overseeing most of the tricky details of takeoff, landing, and maneuver, it may yet have utility by ripping out the cockpit and using it as a mothership for the semi-autonomous weapons that it will inevitably carry.

But that's a job that a Predator already does for a fraction of the cost.

Unfortunately, I cannot foresee any way in which a human being will be able to survive the crushing maneuvers such a vehicle will have to use just to stay in the game, except by removing the pilot from the vehicle entirely.

I really hope we don't have to learn that the hard way. That's how you lose a war in a day.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

I'd feel a lot safer with Medicare for All. Scuba Feb 2012 #1
+1 Fearless Feb 2012 #10
For sure. A $trillion here, a $trillion there, pretty soon you are talking indepat Feb 2012 #27
I'm interested. bluedigger Feb 2012 #2
Clearly they should have to pay it outright for 75 years like the Postal Service! Fearless Feb 2012 #11
And they'll never be useful. sofa king Feb 2012 #3
Another way of saying: F-35 is already obsolete, and was born an outclassed compromise. leveymg Feb 2012 #4
Yep. sofa king Feb 2012 #6
the military needs to stop replacing our tried and true Aircraft MACARD Feb 2012 #12
Very good points - We already have everything we need, along with incremental upgrades. kysrsoze Feb 2012 #16
Actually, we have a lot more than we need primavera Feb 2012 #31
Agreed Sherman A1 Feb 2012 #25
Not entirely accurate. PavePusher Feb 2012 #29
Sunk costs zipplewrath Feb 2012 #13
Good points. sofa king Feb 2012 #15
Ground support zipplewrath Feb 2012 #18
Ike said... BadtotheboneBob Feb 2012 #5
He also warned us against the military industrial complex Major Nikon Feb 2012 #8
Ironic that it took a soldier to say it... BadtotheboneBob Feb 2012 #24
A bargain at twice the price.... Liberal Veteran Feb 2012 #7
That is $8 million per plane, per year. phantom power Feb 2012 #9
my understanding, I don't have a source handy, is it caost 30-40% more to fly the F35 then the F 22 stevebreeze Feb 2012 #21
tax the corporate churches to pay for it. olddad56 Feb 2012 #14
F 35 purpose = attack US Treasury...Mission Accomplished nt msongs Feb 2012 #17
We'll have to cut more taxes to pay for it. toddwv Feb 2012 #19
Does that include the cost of the USS Saint Ronnie and the USS Poppy Bush? Lasher Feb 2012 #20
Condi Rice said that 9/11 was the result of a lack of "silver bullets" KurtNYC Feb 2012 #22
The Pentagon doesn't care how much it cost they aren't paying for it-Corporation hope it goes higher GreenTea Feb 2012 #23
The Pentagon doesn't know how to handle money. DeSwiss Feb 2012 #26
We are going to need a good adversary to turn these things loose Former_DU_Member Feb 2012 #28
“Everybody was on board with … the program,” Robling told Reuters Strelnikov_ Feb 2012 #30
this is just done right bankrupting us lovuian Feb 2012 #32
sounds like an "entitlement" program to me.... nt Locrian Feb 2012 #33
Our current fighter fleet cbrer Feb 2012 #34
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Lifetime Cost To Run F-35...»Reply #15