Latest Breaking News

Frank Cannon

(7,570 posts)

132. It can also be excruciatingly slow and end in failure.

Reply to Name removed (Reply #130)

Sat Oct 19, 2013, 09:26 AM

Oct 2013

Remember the Equal Rights Amendment?

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

142 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Schwarzenegger wants law changed so he can run for president. [View all] dipsydoodle Oct 2013 OP

Nein!! SaveAmerica Oct 2013 #1

Not only nein, but H�lle Nein! liberal N proud Oct 2013 #57

the first two posters are my heroes. LOL! Neither he nor Cruz will ever be president. Imagine. Him roguevalley Oct 2013 #61

Also Scairp Oct 2013 #89

Changing the constitution requires more than just filing some paperwork. <nt> bigworld Oct 2013 #2

if the right people want something, the Constitution is just a scrap of paper yurbud Oct 2013 #88

Didn't he put Callifornia pretty much in the dumpster when he was the govenator? n/t doc03 Oct 2013 #3

He sure did Faux pas Oct 2013 #31

Yes, but so did Reagan and it didn't stop him...n/t Blue Meany Oct 2013 #54

He did. And he managed to get the laundress or one of the maids or was it the governess kestrel91316 Oct 2013 #71

.... DeSwiss Oct 2013 #111

More like this Scairp Oct 2013 #90

Yes because he preferred to borrow rather than to raise taxes and pay for what he bought. JDPriestly Oct 2013 #92

well, dont forget how cheaply an office can be had, even in mid-second term reddread Oct 2013 #106

Right. Schwarzenegger rewarded the electricity industry for his election. JDPriestly Oct 2013 #119

... nolabear Oct 2013 #4

The law of gravity? KurtNYC Oct 2013 #5

Come one now, that is a cheap shot Kelvin Mace Oct 2013 #23

How about his health as an issue? Spitfire of ATJ Oct 2013 #41

His health, Kelvin Mace Oct 2013 #48

As long as he can father illegitimate children ... cosmicone Oct 2013 #51

A LOT of that was hype to get him off the hook for Iran Contra.... Spitfire of ATJ Oct 2013 #53

I watched a couple of interviews of him BEFORE the Iran/Contra fiasco Kelvin Mace Oct 2013 #55

As a result he LITERALLY thought there were commies under his bed.... Spitfire of ATJ Oct 2013 #76

Very funny ... i forgot about this skit ... rtassi Oct 2013 #77

Except that he used his looks to get where he got. JDPriestly Oct 2013 #93

You're absolutely right. He's stupid, he's empty. Typical Republican. n/t Judi Lynn Oct 2013 #124

I agree Scairp Oct 2013 #96

Agreed! Kelvin Mace Oct 2013 #117

His appearance has been the focus of his entire life. Judi Lynn Oct 2013 #123

I agree that the man is shallow and narcissistic Kelvin Mace Oct 2013 #139

Steroids are dangerous as you can see bigdarryl Oct 2013 #6

So is old age... VanillaRhapsody Oct 2013 #7

AHHHNold....is prime example why we should NOT change the law.. VanillaRhapsody Oct 2013 #8

He's a bad actor... GReedDiamond Oct 2013 #9

Because you did such a good job running CA sakabatou Oct 2013 #10

He's a fucking fool. LuvNewcastle Oct 2013 #11

Three strikes against him. He sucked as LibDemAlways Oct 2013 #12

It's not a law, it's a constitutional requirement JayhawkSD Oct 2013 #13

Whoever wrote that article isn't too sharp either - groundloop Oct 2013 #22

Agreed, he also needs Kelvin Mace Oct 2013 #25

Yes, it would take a constitutional amendment treestar Oct 2013 #65

He was the worst governor in the history of California. olddad56 Oct 2013 #14

Maria looks 1 million % better tavernier Oct 2013 #15

Do they HAVE a presidency in Austria? Plucketeer Oct 2013 #16

Heinz Fischer. dipsydoodle Oct 2013 #37

I wonder why nobody ever mentions his decades of obvious steroid abuse. Skeeter Barnes Oct 2013 #17

well obama is the president! so...... madrchsod Oct 2013 #18

This is a non-starter...... Swede Atlanta Oct 2013 #19

Not only that, but as it has been mentioned countless times Blue_Tires Oct 2013 #24

It's actually 3/4 of the states,not 2/3. n/t SpankMe Oct 2013 #30

And what President is going to sign it, does Ahnuld think a Repuke treestar Oct 2013 #66

Presidential approval isn't required for a Constitutional amendment Jim Lane Oct 2013 #128

...3/4 of the states... truebluegreen Oct 2013 #69

True. But there is a better chance of this happening. alphafemale Oct 2013 #137

Argh. No. Just No. Buddha_of_Wisdom Oct 2013 #20

.... DeSwiss Oct 2013 #112

What is that Politicalboi Oct 2013 #118

Fuck off Ahnold, you corrupt, incompetent piece of shit. nt SunSeeker Oct 2013 #21

That about captures it, succinctly. closeupready Oct 2013 #33

Yes because the ghost of raygun ronnie MyNameGoesHere Oct 2013 #26

He's ready to file papers to challenge the constitution? Renew Deal Oct 2013 #27

Destiny Ace Acme Oct 2013 #28

Sometimes we need to actually read things before posting about them JayhawkSD Oct 2013 #29

Read my lips...HELL NO! SoapBox Oct 2013 #32

there's also the little fact that his father was in the SS. He had to prove his racial roguevalley Oct 2013 #64

Then EVERY restaurant would be Taco Bell. Spitfire of ATJ Oct 2013 #34

That was Sly. nt awoke_in_2003 Oct 2013 #39

Oh, Bullocks! Spitfire of ATJ Oct 2013 #42

... awoke_in_2003 Oct 2013 #72

Or Pizza Hut thelordofhell Oct 2013 #56

Yeah when the movie is on here in Korea they use Pizza Hut davidpdx Oct 2013 #82

Its a silly fake article. former9thward Oct 2013 #35

No he doesn't .....he has a movie that's tanking and he wants some free publicity right now. Nt pkdu Oct 2013 #36

Sound thinking. old guy Oct 2013 #47

The movie is the real reason for this move Gothmog Oct 2013 #129

Sure.. sendero Oct 2013 #38

Early onset DEMENTIA? Wernothelpless Oct 2013 #40

Well, that's my laugh for the day Auggie Oct 2013 #43

Actually this is not entirely true LittleGirl Oct 2013 #44

There is more to it than that... Tx4obama Oct 2013 #94

why thank you for that clarification LittleGirl Oct 2013 #95

Cruz is eligible (though Schwarzenegger isn't) Jim Lane Oct 2013 #125

It is NOT that simple. See articles below Tx4obama Oct 2013 #140

Law one thing Constitution another...a change takes an amendment. Evasporque Oct 2013 #45

"...an insider told New York Post." subterranean Oct 2013 #46

The Toilet Paper Post :) dballance Oct 2013 #50

Exactly. The Post is a rag, Page Six is its gossip column, and this is an unsourced item. Jim Lane Oct 2013 #127

What is the crap about the courts allowing voters to decide. That's BS. dballance Oct 2013 #49

and we can let motorists decide if they want to obey traffic laws and signals too Arnie. TeamPooka Oct 2013 #122

People in hell want ice water too get the red out Oct 2013 #52

Oh grand...so he can turn the WhiteHouse into his own personal brothel SummerSnow Oct 2013 #58

Yeah, no thanks. He nearly killed my state. What an arrogant asshole. byronius Oct 2013 #59

Yeah, good luck with that one. nft. TheOther95Percent Oct 2013 #60

From California SCVDem Oct 2013 #62

A shorter Ronald Reagan on steriods Blue Owl Oct 2013 #63

have at it, hoss! paulkienitz Oct 2013 #67

"The law" in question is the Constitution. truebluegreen Oct 2013 #68

It's just Arnold's publicist trying to keep his name in the news. Mr.Bill Oct 2013 #70

Thank you. I expect pecs-for-brains to come out and debunk this story in a few hours Bucky Oct 2013 #73

He may be a surrogate for the Cruz folks. nt okaawhatever Oct 2013 #74

That's exactly what I'm thinking. There is no way with his personnel snagglepuss Oct 2013 #78

Academic questions, but... Would he run as a pro-choice, pro-gay rights Republican? Bucky Oct 2013 #75

Yep. That's the only thing standing between him and the presidency. /nt Ash_F Oct 2013 #79

This has to be a joke darkangel218 Oct 2013 #80

I'd like to see a constitutional amendment for that issue. deurbano Oct 2013 #81

It's an obnoxious provision DavidDvorkin Oct 2013 #83

Limitless Narcissist EGO bucolic_frolic Oct 2013 #84

Give me a break. Things are not bad enough? Paper Roses Oct 2013 #85

because he was so popular as governor in California? yurbud Oct 2013 #86

unfortunately, the same trick he played on CA could work on the national stage yurbud Oct 2013 #87

The Republicans have plenty of nutjob candidates to choose from... Frank Cannon Oct 2013 #131

their current crop of nutjobs couldn't attract a single swing voter yurbud Oct 2013 #141

ABSOLUTELY NOT! He messed up California. Enough is enough. JDPriestly Oct 2013 #91

Don't bother. You're a sneak, a liar and a cheat, Arnold. Hopefully, you WON'T be back. judesedit Oct 2013 #97

get over yourself! RussBLib Oct 2013 #98

I'd like Bill Clinton to take another term or two. marble falls Oct 2013 #99

Yeah, we're going to have a Constitutional Convention, just for YOU!!! pnwmom Oct 2013 #100

That will take more than a law, it will require a Constitutional Amendment. Uncle Joe Oct 2013 #101

and if he got over those hurdles, he would have to win an election. That would never happen... olddad56 Oct 2013 #103

another idiocy for the GOP to burn their billion$ on wordpix Oct 2013 #115

just make a B grade movie where he plays the role of an inept president and be done with it. olddad56 Oct 2013 #102

baby mama needs a new set of shoes! reddread Oct 2013 #104

I bet he does. nt silvershadow Oct 2013 #105

Our best constitutional scholars are in Ireland, dontchaknow? jmowreader Oct 2013 #107

Arnold can run. The Constitution says absolutely nothing about running for President. He just 24601 Oct 2013 #108

What a moran! I wonder if he could get elected dogcatcher in Alaska nowadays IrishAyes Oct 2013 #109

OH, HELL NO!!!! A HESSIAN IN THE TEA PARTY???? DeSwiss Oct 2013 #110

That's one of the worst written articles I have ever seen. Nye Bevan Oct 2013 #113

hail mary pass thrown by GOP looking at the Cruz-led clown car wordpix Oct 2013 #114

His first challenge will be actually finding this "law". Fearless Oct 2013 #116

In the spirit of compromise, let's meet him half way. Amimnoch Oct 2013 #120

FU Arnold! workinclasszero Oct 2013 #121

Well, even if it comes to a vote... Scootaloo Oct 2013 #126

Message auto-removed Name removed Oct 2013 #130

It can also be excruciatingly slow and end in failure. Frank Cannon Oct 2013 #132

Message auto-removed Name removed Oct 2013 #133

Not for Arnold Schwarzenegger, it won't. Frank Cannon Oct 2013 #134

Message auto-removed Name removed Oct 2013 #135

He would have done better as governor of California Turbineguy Oct 2013 #136

This is a joke right? Dyedinthewoolliberal Oct 2013 #138

Revise it to include "...arrogant egotistical candidates are permitted." BootinUp Oct 2013 #142