Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Latest Breaking News
In reply to the discussion: Romney Sued for RICO in Fed Court [View all]laserhaas
(7,805 posts)26. Well, don't count it as a loss YET.
Due to the fact that the case going public and they know I've got the evidence - the STOCK is still trading (at $.02 per as symbol "etysq"
Because they had to keep the case where they could (corruptively) control it (in Delaware); they have left an evidence trail that a blind, deaf, mute could successfully prosecute them with.
And - there is NO statute of limitations
(especially when you possess your very own {non-investigating} corrupt U.S. Attorney)
If a miracle should occur and the court here in SoCal does not give in to the powers
That stock can be made to trade again
Cannot edit, recommend, or reply in locked discussions
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
116 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Yes- I remember how the stores became messy, disintegrated; the stock just wasn't there anymore
NBachers
Oct 2013
#61
Correct - 'bemildred' - If it was about the $, I would have take their bribe in 2001
laserhaas
Oct 2013
#17
I wish my knowledge of the law was sophisticated enough to do this to my city.
Baitball Blogger
Oct 2013
#22
If it's true that "Romney, Bain Capital and ..." are above the law, as you say,
AnotherMcIntosh
Oct 2013
#107