Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Latest Breaking News

(47,437 posts)

13. Well I must be missing something, since I thought the lead was less than a 1000.

Fri Nov 8, 2013, 09:58 PM

Nov 2013

So winning 68.8 % of 3008 extra votes would have been enough to overcome this lead.
But apparently not?

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

17 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Nearly 2,000 votes in Fairfax possibly uncounted [View all] brooklynite Nov 2013 OP

For better or worse, this is what Fairfax is reporting today. brooklynite Nov 2013 #4

The number is: 3,008 Tx4obama Nov 2013 #7

That math doesn't work. LisaL Nov 2013 #11

Yes of course, elleng Nov 2013 #5

This message was self-deleted by its author brooklynite Nov 2013 #3

Let me guess...all Democratic cast ballots, right? blkmusclmachine Nov 2013 #8

3,008. Dawson Leery Nov 2013 #9

This guy should check his math. LisaL Nov 2013 #10

Glad you're paying close attention elleng Nov 2013 #12

I thought so too, elleng Nov 2013 #14

See Comment #15 Tx4obama Nov 2013 #16

Thanks Tx4, elleng Nov 2013 #17