Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Latest Breaking News
In reply to the discussion: Washington GMO labeling initiative losing, but not done. [View all]proverbialwisdom
(4,959 posts)22. Related.
http://www.nwprogressive.org/weblog/
Friday, November 8th, 2013
Initiative 522 gets another boost as Snohomish and Clallam join the Yes column
If youre a supporter of Initiative 522 like we are, youll be glad to know that Yes on I-522′s share of the vote is still headed upwards on the eve of the fifth day of ballot counting, and now stands at 47.85%. Thats an improvement of more than two full percentage points since Election Night, which is cool to see.
In addition, two more counties have joined the Yes camp: Clallam and Snohomish. Clallam is now backing the initiative, 50.09% to 49.91%. On Election Night, it was rejecting I-522, 52.5% to 47.5%. The story in Snohomish is similar. Just three days ago it was against I-522, but now its in the Yes column.
50.7% voters in Snohomish are for I-522 as of the latest tally. 49.3% are opposed. On Election Night, 51.7% were opposed and 48.3% were for.
Two more counties may potentially flip before the election is certified: Kitsap and Island. In Kitsap County, I-522 is down by only ; in Island County, the initiative is behind by only two hundred and five votes.
Despite these gains, we still anticipate that I-522 will be defeated, because it started out too far behind on Election Night. The number of outstanding ballots is dropping, which means there will be fewer and fewer ballots tabulated and added to the tally in the days ahead. There are 147,688 ballots waiting to be processed as of tonight, according to the Secretary of State. Most of those are in King, Snohomish, and Pierce counties (the three most populous).
I-522 presently trails by 68,135 votes. To make up that gap, Yes on I-522 would need to capture more than 73% of the remaining 147,688 ballots. We think that is unlikely to occur. The margin will continue to tighten, but when the election is certified, I-522 will be defeated, unfortunately. It probably would have passed handily had it been on the ballot last year.
Friday, November 8th, 2013
Initiative 522 gets another boost as Snohomish and Clallam join the Yes column
If youre a supporter of Initiative 522 like we are, youll be glad to know that Yes on I-522′s share of the vote is still headed upwards on the eve of the fifth day of ballot counting, and now stands at 47.85%. Thats an improvement of more than two full percentage points since Election Night, which is cool to see.
In addition, two more counties have joined the Yes camp: Clallam and Snohomish. Clallam is now backing the initiative, 50.09% to 49.91%. On Election Night, it was rejecting I-522, 52.5% to 47.5%. The story in Snohomish is similar. Just three days ago it was against I-522, but now its in the Yes column.
50.7% voters in Snohomish are for I-522 as of the latest tally. 49.3% are opposed. On Election Night, 51.7% were opposed and 48.3% were for.
Two more counties may potentially flip before the election is certified: Kitsap and Island. In Kitsap County, I-522 is down by only ; in Island County, the initiative is behind by only two hundred and five votes.
Despite these gains, we still anticipate that I-522 will be defeated, because it started out too far behind on Election Night. The number of outstanding ballots is dropping, which means there will be fewer and fewer ballots tabulated and added to the tally in the days ahead. There are 147,688 ballots waiting to be processed as of tonight, according to the Secretary of State. Most of those are in King, Snohomish, and Pierce counties (the three most populous).
I-522 presently trails by 68,135 votes. To make up that gap, Yes on I-522 would need to capture more than 73% of the remaining 147,688 ballots. We think that is unlikely to occur. The margin will continue to tighten, but when the election is certified, I-522 will be defeated, unfortunately. It probably would have passed handily had it been on the ballot last year.
Thursday, November 7th, 2013
Thurston County joins the Yes on I-522 camp as margin of defeat narrows again
Those of us who enthusiastically supported Initiative 522 (to label genetically modified foods) have some good news to cheer tonight: Thurston County has switched sides and joined the Yes camp as of the latest tally, bringing the total number of counties in favor of I-522 to five.
Meanwhile, the Yes vote statewide climbed to 47.05%, pushing the No vote below 53%, to 52.95%. We are still projecting that I-522 will be defeated, but it appears that the margin of victory for I-522′s opponents could be somewhat slim, which reinforces our view that I-522 could have passed last year, had it been on the ballot like I-502 (marijuana legalization) and Referendum 74 (marriage equality).
<>
Thurston County joins the Yes on I-522 camp as margin of defeat narrows again
Those of us who enthusiastically supported Initiative 522 (to label genetically modified foods) have some good news to cheer tonight: Thurston County has switched sides and joined the Yes camp as of the latest tally, bringing the total number of counties in favor of I-522 to five.
Meanwhile, the Yes vote statewide climbed to 47.05%, pushing the No vote below 53%, to 52.95%. We are still projecting that I-522 will be defeated, but it appears that the margin of victory for I-522′s opponents could be somewhat slim, which reinforces our view that I-522 could have passed last year, had it been on the ballot like I-502 (marijuana legalization) and Referendum 74 (marriage equality).
<>
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
37 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
The only reason I've seen on DU that agribusiness fights so hard against labeling is because
LanternWaste
Nov 2013
#8
'No Promises': Key Senators Won't Commit to Protecting States' Rights to Label GMOs
proverbialwisdom
Nov 2013
#18
Multinationals already comply with diverse labeling laws in other countries, mainly by removing GMO
proverbialwisdom
Nov 2013
#37