Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

christx30

(6,241 posts)
44. Then he should have said that.
Sat Nov 9, 2013, 01:09 PM
Nov 2013

And what was the insurance company supposed to do? They could send the letter that said "Starting January 1st, your policy will be brought up to the standards set forth in the ACA, but your price will triple. You can either stick with us, or you can go to the market place."
The end result would have been the same. People that were in policies that met their needs at a price they could afford would lose that. They would now be in policies that were way more than they wanted.
I like to use cable TV as an analogy for this: Someone has basic cable for $18/mo. They don't watch much TV. Just network stuff and PBS. Then along comes the law that says they have to get digital cable with a $10 box and all the premium channels for $100/mo. Something else in their life is going to have to give at some point. Even with subsidies they aren't going to be able to get down to what they were paying for basic TV. They might watch a show or two on discovery now that they have it. Hell, they might as well, now that they have no choice but to pay for it. But they are not eating as well. They are having to struggle with other bills. Or they'll just go without TV entirely and pay the fine. All because some busybody in Washington wanted to "enrich" their lives.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

o.k.... Some of you guys who really stay current on this.. busterbrown Nov 2013 #1
I don't think anybody told him about the problem marshall Nov 2013 #2
Here's an interesting take on it, from truthdig: marmar Nov 2013 #3
Very interesting. woo me with science Nov 2013 #10
I don't have any inside information... sendero Nov 2013 #32
Obama has some big-time 'splainin' to do on several key issues . . . MrModerate Nov 2013 #7
This thing is going to get fixed and rather quickly... busterbrown Nov 2013 #9
Yes, I do believe he could have scaled back drone usage and reined in the NSA . . . MrModerate Nov 2013 #12
If there was an outside terrorist attack on our country ... busterbrown Nov 2013 #14
And something like that is probably what he decided. MrModerate Nov 2013 #21
Well we’re not that far about such issues.. busterbrown Nov 2013 #22
I've got an idea. Stay the fuck on topic! phleshdef Nov 2013 #13
How's this for a suggestion? MrModerate Nov 2013 #20
Really... phleshdef Nov 2013 #23
Then. Don't. Read. It. This is not exactly rocket science. n/t MrModerate Nov 2013 #30
Kinda tough to realize a post is irrelevant and pushing an agenda until after one reads it... LanternWaste Nov 2013 #34
My point -- made several times to phleshdef . . . MrModerate Nov 2013 #38
There was an article here recently that said they did know. Mojorabbit Nov 2013 #19
Still waiting for Bush and the Republicans to say they are sorry. gulliver Nov 2013 #4
seriously I mean, WTF Skittles Nov 2013 #24
This will sure as hell be used to beat us to death in the coming years Kelvin Mace Nov 2013 #5
Yes it will. Honesty often doesn't play well in politics. groundloop Nov 2013 #8
A graceful apology and a promise to do better . . . MrModerate Nov 2013 #6
I think that American healthcare was in a far worse state than anyone thought Dopers_Greed Nov 2013 #11
Obamacare is surviving and once people learn its potential Iliyah Nov 2013 #15
Obama should have done a better job in communicating in advance that these plans would end. Pterodactyl Nov 2013 #16
But he told the opposite. christx30 Nov 2013 #37
Yeah, I'm a little disappointed in him. Pterodactyl Nov 2013 #40
I guess if he had told the truth christx30 Nov 2013 #41
Yeah, probably. :( Pterodactyl Nov 2013 #43
Foot in mouth RayStar Nov 2013 #17
What he should have said... Rosa Luxemburg Nov 2013 #18
define 'better' quadrature Nov 2013 #25
Every such "report" turned out to be bullshit. SunSeeker Nov 2013 #28
no Rosa Luxemburg Nov 2013 #39
who decides what's better for someone else?...nt quadrature Nov 2013 #42
Sorry you can't keep your crappy, discriminatory, rip-off insurance policy. nt Deep13 Nov 2013 #26
That's not an apology. Not sure why anyone assumed he would or should apologise. idwiyo Nov 2013 #27
Sorry your shitty insurance company is dropping you thelordofhell Nov 2013 #29
One thing to keep in mind not often mentioned. Stevepol Nov 2013 #31
+1 FailureToCommunicate Nov 2013 #33
This was obvious to me from day one crim son Nov 2013 #36
Then he should have said that. christx30 Nov 2013 #44
The spin on the ACA problems is insane Dopers_Greed Nov 2013 #35
I think you may be right. Pterodactyl Dec 2013 #45
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Obama says he's sorry Ame...»Reply #44