Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

MADem

(135,425 posts)
53. The BBC covered this story on their morning news programme two days ago.It's not CT. It's news.
Sun Nov 10, 2013, 03:58 AM
Nov 2013

They didn't ascribe blame, but one has to ask the cui bono question.

Unless one is completely uncurious.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

??? The russians found no polonium-poisoning. DetlefK Nov 2013 #1
I doubt they used gamma radiation. AngryAmish Nov 2013 #3
You misunderstood. They aren't turning Arafat into Hulk. The other way round. DetlefK Nov 2013 #11
and the Russians are among the main suspects for having used this method in the past VanillaRhapsody Nov 2013 #5
Yes... I'd surely be more likely to believe the Swiss scientists, all things being equal hlthe2b Nov 2013 #9
I am not buying this Scairp Nov 2013 #64
Russia has been known to *use* this material in this way... so... AtheistCrusader Nov 2013 #7
"Our chief investigator in the death of christx30 Nov 2013 #49
Well, one possibility Kelvin Mace Nov 2013 #15
That was later retracted by the Russian agency dipsydoodle Nov 2013 #24
Isn't that like asking the Mafia NickB79 Nov 2013 #47
Well, damn Scootaloo Nov 2013 #2
after the story of the original person who died from it PatrynXX Nov 2013 #4
Scary. Horrible way to go. Ava Gadro Nov 2013 #54
I was as well, but... still unanswered questions here, like 'who benefits'. AtheistCrusader Nov 2013 #8
Excellent Question... mpcamb Nov 2013 #34
The guys who were next in line, perhaps? nt MADem Nov 2013 #52
Notice the word above, "decaying." Archae Nov 2013 #6
Israel wanted Arafat dead so they could replace him with Hamas and the CIA controlled abbas. Jesus Malverde Nov 2013 #12
Odd, I thought conspiracy theories were a big no no or have the rules changed? cstanleytech Nov 2013 #23
I'd take that up with the wall street journal. Jesus Malverde Nov 2013 #29
Except it was you posting here not the wall street journal. nt cstanleytech Nov 2013 #30
Maybe this will add some perspective Jesus Malverde Nov 2013 #31
So other than opinion pieces that have conspiracy theories over why x might have done x cstanleytech Nov 2013 #32
I often wonder if those that denounce conspiriacy theorists LiberalLovinLug Nov 2013 #33
And I often wonder why people believe in conspiracy theories like cstanleytech Nov 2013 #37
You proved my point LiberalLovinLug Nov 2013 #42
Thats because by definition all conspiracy theories belong in the same boat. cstanleytech Nov 2013 #45
Nope. Weak argument. You're busted. Ghost Dog Nov 2013 #60
Well, gosh, you know, you can go back, really 60 or 70 years. Jesus Malverde Nov 2013 #35
Look, I am not saying its impossible cstanleytech Nov 2013 #36
It was from democracy now. thanks for playing...nt Jesus Malverde Nov 2013 #38
So? Conspiracy bs is still conspiracy bs regardless of source. nt cstanleytech Nov 2013 #40
The BBC covered this story on their morning news programme two days ago.It's not CT. It's news. MADem Nov 2013 #53
Oh, good Lord. bitchkitty Nov 2013 #46
Provide the proof otherwise be the one who is obtuse. nt cstanleytech Nov 2013 #48
What has happened here is exactly what one expects in a scientific investigation: bemildred Nov 2013 #55
That is pretty much how BBC played it, but my sense was they felt it was slightly more than MADem Nov 2013 #56
Well yeah, don't want to jump to any conclusions. bemildred Nov 2013 #57
Yes. Ghost Dog Nov 2013 #61
I'll take note of it if you tell me what line to look in... HereSince1628 Nov 2013 #13
Oh shit, here we go. MicaelS Nov 2013 #10
So? JackRiddler Nov 2013 #39
So he was smuggling Polonium? That bastard! Orrex Nov 2013 #14
Did they measure the assholium too? Dreamer Tatum Nov 2013 #16
wow. just heard this on the Majority Report as well. nashville_brook Nov 2013 #17
Hmm, which is the closest nuclear power to Palestine? ChairmanAgnostic Nov 2013 #18
Polonium-210 has some common industrial applications hack89 Nov 2013 #21
Wait how can that be true when so so many people laughed It off as insane ??? lunasun Nov 2013 #19
DU's take on it: 1000words Nov 2013 #27
Because there are a bunch of people who don't understand how the world works BlueStreak Nov 2013 #28
Lets see what the University Centre of Legal Medicine actually says hack89 Nov 2013 #20
And perhaps 2naSalit Nov 2013 #25
Suspects? Jack Rabbit Nov 2013 #22
Funny they were saying it was thallium before, now it is polonium? lostincalifornia Nov 2013 #26
Report on Arafat More ‘Soap Opera’ Than Science, Palmor Says Jesus Malverde Nov 2013 #41
"As an observer from the side," elleng Nov 2013 #43
Buenos días, Jesus. Ghost Dog Nov 2013 #62
Hola Ghost, estoy celoso si vives en las canarias... Jesus Malverde Nov 2013 #63
Saludos. Sí. Islas afortunadas. Ghost Dog Nov 2013 #67
Russian report stirs new confusion in Arafat death Behind the Aegis Nov 2013 #44
'normal level of polonium', is exactly how much? quadrature Nov 2013 #50
I thought they killed him...whosoever "they" might be. MADem Nov 2013 #51
Why do this? Ash_F Nov 2013 #58
Color me skeptical - it's been 23 Po-210 half-lives since he died. Puts the numbers off the charts. sir pball Nov 2013 #59
Do people carry around a steady amount of Po-210 while alive? Ash_F Nov 2013 #65
I don't know how much we normally carry, if any, but sir pball Nov 2013 #66
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Report: Swiss scientists ...»Reply #53