Latest Breaking News
In reply to the discussion: Democrats Might Have Won the Last Big Election of 2013 With a Newly Discovered Voting Machine [View all]wikiguyjd
(3 posts)Seems like there is a big burden of proof on the people from this
voting location to convince us that this is what they say it is, and
so news people reporting on this should be asking a number of
pertinent questions:
How was it POSSIBLE that they "overlooked" this machine?
Where did this happen--give us a feel for the physical properties of the place.
How many people were on-site?
How many "machines" were there, and what kind are they?
What was the procedure that was followed on election night
to avoid overlooking any machines, and to avoid the possibility
of machines going missing or extra machines mysteriously
showing up, etc.
Was there a log of machines in service? How was it possible for
a machine to be in service, and not to have had its votes counted?
What were the chain of custody procedures from the end of election night
until the machine with the extra votes was noticed?
I.e.: Please convince us that it was really overlooked, i.e.:
How do we know that this machine and its votes are actually from
election night, and that the votes were not put there in the middle
of the night, last night? What are the procedures, how were the
machines and the site secured after election night, etc.
Seems like we should also be asking whether it is possible to simply
put another machine in service that was not used on election night,
tell the machine it is election night, record some votes, turn machine off, and VOILA!