Latest Breaking News

mpcamb

(3,212 posts)

4. WHY TF don't the republicans admit that F&F was a BUSH program...

Sat Nov 16, 2013, 07:40 PM

Nov 2013

Why TF did Holder ever support it?
As disgusted as I am with the acts of the Bush Administration, I'm appalled at this administration's willingness to go along with policies that were wholly and completely against what they'd promised.

Screw Holder for not chasing bankers and concentrating on punishing marijuana crimes (maybe I ought to put 'crimes' in quotes). If he gets his ass kicked I won't be sad. In fact, and I know this sounds bitter, I look forward to it. I think he's been a sorry excuse for a reversal of what went wrong in the preceding 8 years.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

14 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Holder seeks Fast and Furious appeal [View all] alp227 Nov 2013 OP

WHY TF don't the republicans admit that F&F was a BUSH program..... George II Nov 2013 #1

for some reason they like to protect each other PatrynXX Nov 2013 #2

F&F started a few months into Obama's administration. Igel Nov 2013 #3

WHY TF don't the republicans admit that F&F was a BUSH program... mpcamb Nov 2013 #4

N/T Chakab Nov 2013 #6

big difference between Bush and Obama era gunrunning quadrature Nov 2013 #5

Read the fortune article that I linked to. There was no Obama era gunrunning. Chakab Nov 2013 #7

Yep. That's exactly what Republicans are saying. BlueCaliDem Nov 2013 #9

Better yet, that there WAS NO "Fast and Furious"? Spitfire of ATJ Nov 2013 #8

F&F was not a Bush program Ranchemp. Nov 2013 #11

Well well. Kingofalldems Nov 2013 #12

It pretty much was, Ranchemp. Nov 2013 #14

Gun fetishists' little black helicopter fantasies will eventually be marginalized. nt onehandle Nov 2013 #10

Correct me if I am wrong ripcord Nov 2013 #13