Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

litlbilly

(2,227 posts)
24. Again, its the Cry Wolf Scenario
Thu Nov 21, 2013, 01:29 PM
Nov 2013

they've been doing that all along so all they will do is continue what they've been doing. Won't make any difference and I think the progressives are starting to figure it out. Actually make the crime fit the punishment so to speak. I say, increase min wage, do all the things progressives want to do and they will win elections. If we pound that home over and over it might fully sink in.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

'Bout time. Hissyspit Nov 2013 #1
Excellent! Laelth Nov 2013 #2
This is why this vote is important, the Rethugs have abused the filibuster. See charts inside. Fla Dem Nov 2013 #27
That is an astonishing chart. sofa king Nov 2013 #38
Thank you, Harry. nt brer cat Nov 2013 #3
A slow fuse but Mira Nov 2013 #4
'Beware the wrath of a patient man.' ~ IrishAyes freshwest Nov 2013 #34
I want to know which Democrats voted against the rule change. n/t GoneFishin Nov 2013 #5
I had that exact question. Jackpine Radical Nov 2013 #7
Levin, Manchin and Pryor brooklynite Nov 2013 #11
thank you! I was wondering :) n/t chillfactor Nov 2013 #14
WELL DONE HARRY!! chillfactor Nov 2013 #6
A long time coming, but DAMN, yes. (n/t) Guilded Lilly Nov 2013 #8
Holy cow! Lucy didn't pull the football away. Jerry442 Nov 2013 #9
Saw this comment on another board leftynyc Nov 2013 #33
IMPORTANT: The filibuster is not completely gone. Arkana Nov 2013 #10
Also for Supreme Court Nominees amb123 Nov 2013 #13
It is a start though. Gonna make them think twice on screaming about nothing and fillibustering litlbilly Nov 2013 #17
Yep. It's odd. Dems are ok with letting the Republicans obstruct other business. GoneFishin Nov 2013 #41
woooohoooo! lillypaddle Nov 2013 #12
The Cry Wolf Scenario...LOVE IT litlbilly Nov 2013 #15
Does not bode well for the future with GOP Senate Majorities bucolic_frolic Nov 2013 #16
Couldn't the current majority change it back right before a Republican majority take-over? nt Stardust Nov 2013 #30
Yes, but bucolic_frolic Nov 2013 #36
No Obama appointees, you mean jmowreader Nov 2013 #39
It is about time. cate94 Nov 2013 #18
Good. Despite what Jimmy Stewart thought... aristocles Nov 2013 #19
I foresee the corporate media blaming the Dems Iliyah Nov 2013 #20
agreed... chillfactor Nov 2013 #21
Again, its the Cry Wolf Scenario litlbilly Nov 2013 #24
Does ACA cover xxqqqzme Nov 2013 #25
yes unfortunately:) litlbilly Nov 2013 #26
Yup. SoapBox Nov 2013 #23
They have to stop screaming about the ACA if they want to freak out about the rule change. JoePhilly Nov 2013 #32
Legislation Will Still Face The 60 Vote Requirement DallasNE Nov 2013 #22
More changes need to be made Jack Rabbit Nov 2013 #28
Exactly.... this only applies to non Supreme Judges groundloop Nov 2013 #37
No longer the do nothing Democrats! Baitball Blogger Nov 2013 #29
finally Liberalynn Nov 2013 #31
Elizabeth Warren laid out the case here: freshwest Nov 2013 #35
Republicans have already found a way to F*CK up judicial nominees !!!!!!!!!! Tx4obama Nov 2013 #40
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Senate goes 'nuclear,' De...»Reply #24