Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Latest Breaking News

Showing Original Post only (View all)

Judi Lynn

(164,122 posts)
Sat Nov 23, 2013, 07:53 PM Nov 2013

Jim Cooper Proposes Ban On Death Gratuity For Lawmakers' Spouses [View all]

Source: Huffington Post

Jim Cooper Proposes Ban On Death Gratuity For Lawmakers' Spouses
The Huffington Post | By Ashley Alman Posted: 11/23/2013 6:08 pm EST | Updated: 11/23/2013 6:14 pm EST

Rep. Jim Cooper (D-Tenn.) introduced a resolution in the House this week, proposing a ban on death gratuities for spouses of deceased lawmakers.

When a member of Congress dies in office, an item is inserted into the next appropriations bill, granting the equivalent of one year's pay to the survivors of the lawmaker.

On Saturday, Cooper told The Hill that members of Congress should not receive such "special treatment," but should secure their families' futures through life insurance, "like regular citizens."

"The death gratuity became customary starting in 1918 before the birth of modern life insurance (1924), the creation of Social Security (1935), the establishment of civil service pensions (1942), and health benefits under Medicare (1965)," Cooper said. "A lot has changed since 1918, and the gratuity custom should have been abandoned a long time ago."


Read more: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/11/23/jim-cooper-death-gratuity_n_4330544.html

22 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
I'm good with this idea. Autumn Nov 2013 #1
"like regular citizens"???? bucolic_frolic Nov 2013 #2
Yep, because it is obviously the most important thing to do. Typical blue dog idiot. Mass Nov 2013 #3
I know of no other examples of Federal officialdom whose spouses get a year's pay as a benefit OmahaBlueDog Nov 2013 #4
May be, but there are a lot of more important things to do. This is grandstanding, Mass Nov 2013 #5
I don't have stats. I'd guess 1-2 per Congress OmahaBlueDog Nov 2013 #6
I doubt there would be much savings at all - in fact, it COULD be more expensive karynnj Nov 2013 #8
It would save all the money paid out. Thor_MN Nov 2013 #11
I may be wrong, but I think many in the private world have employer paid karynnj Nov 2013 #14
That's true but it used to be more prevalent. Lasher Nov 2013 #18
It's not exactly the same thing Major Nikon Nov 2013 #10
Federal government employees HAVE a group life insurance policy, elleng Nov 2013 #19
This is what I'm saying OmahaBlueDog Nov 2013 #22
Idiot? Why are we funding the widow of some fat cat pol, for a year? SoapBox Nov 2013 #15
I wonder if life insurance on all Congress people would be more expensive. karynnj Nov 2013 #7
Good idea----AND TAKE AWAY THEIR SINGLE-PAYER HEALTHCARE AS WELL... nikto Nov 2013 #9
They, and other federal employees, elleng Nov 2013 #20
He's gonna save, what, a penny per taxpayer with this grandstanding tomfoolery? Jackpine Radical Nov 2013 #12
No. Why are we funding this? Why do the widows get a years wages? SoapBox Nov 2013 #16
Totally agree. AzDar Nov 2013 #13
I have a better idea jmowreader Nov 2013 #17
I agree gopiscrap Nov 2013 #21
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Jim Cooper Proposes Ban O...