Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

jtuck004

(15,882 posts)
4. So does this mean WA state will be taking back the 8000 letters they sent, including
Sun Nov 24, 2013, 11:49 PM
Nov 2013

the one to Sanford, which states that the calculations were incorrect. Will this reporter be "debunking" the other 7,999 and telling the state how wrong they were, and are?

The state says he does NOT qualify for Medicare and sent her a letter telling her this. This reporter says he does. Wonder who is going to win? The reporter also fails to note that "compounded" drugs are covered in hospital settings, but not necessarily at home. (I notice he cleverly substituted the word "prescription", but that's not what she said). And the state has acknowledged problems with the website, and that they are addressing them. Did the reporter use the screwed up website to make these calculations?

One of these reporters is a liar, or the situation is a lot less clear than either one of them is telling us. That does not detract from the fact that Rush Limbaugh is a big fat idiot, but it does lead one to believe that a lot of people are sticking their big fat noses in someone else's personal business after she was made a public example by the President, and many of them seem to only see what they want to see, regardless of the facts. Most of which are none of their business.


Thousands get wrong subsidies data from state health exchange
Washington Healthplanfinder said Friday that a calculator on its website mistakenly overestimated tax credits for about 6,000 applications that cover about 8,000 people.
By Amy Snow Landa

About 8,000 Washington residents who are purchasing health insurance on the state’s fledgling exchange marketplace may be getting less of a subsidy than they thought they had coming to help pay for it.

The exchange, called the Washington Healthplanfinder, said Friday that a calculator on its website mistakenly overestimated tax credits for about 6,000 applications that cover about 8,000 people, said Michael Marchand, communications director at the Washington Health Benefit Exchange, which operates Healthplanfinder.

“The exchange is very disappointed to have discovered this issue, and we find the situation unacceptable,” exchange CEO Richard Onizuka said in a statement. “Our staff will not stop working until we have notified all those affected and helped each and every one of our customers to ensure they have the correct tax-credit amount and can choose the best plan to meet their needs and budget.”

The discrepancy between the tax-credit amount that the website calculated for some people and the amount they are actually eligible to receive varies by applicant, said Michael Marchand, communications director at the Washington Health Benefit Exchange, which operates Healthplanfinder. “For some people, it’s pennies a month. For others, it’s much more,” he said.
...

Here.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

I won't be holding my breath waiting for Rush to make the correction MiniMe Nov 2013 #1
No he won't The Last Dem. Nov 2013 #2
Thanks, journalists still exist. It was a no-brainer, but MSM won't tell the truth. freshwest Nov 2013 #3
So does this mean WA state will be taking back the 8000 letters they sent, including jtuck004 Nov 2013 #4
I believe the issue with her wasn't the amount of the subsidies, but that she didn't qualify okaawhatever Nov 2013 #5
The original story said that her son was signed up for Medicaid, but then she got a letter jtuck004 Nov 2013 #8
Compounded vs. prescriptions? For the son? SoapBox Nov 2013 #6
In her story online that I read, it spoke of her son needing a compounded jtuck004 Nov 2013 #9
This is all so silly. We know who is behind all this bullshit. tofuandbeer Nov 2013 #7
Single-payer. blackspade Nov 2013 #10
ACA = Ghouls subsidized to batten on death & disease bread_and_roses Nov 2013 #11
Chosing the Bronze plan because "you can't afford anything better" would be a mistake. NYC_SKP Nov 2013 #12
So ... "lower income people don't know how to make sound financial decisions" eh? bread_and_roses Nov 2013 #13
Payday loans are never a good idea, quit trying to defend decisions to use them. NYC_SKP Nov 2013 #14
"Let them have Bronze ..." bread_and_roses Nov 2013 #20
Choosing the bronze plan because you can't afford the others is not a mistake. Gormy Cuss Nov 2013 #15
Clarification that should have been obvious: "Monthly premium should not the only criterion." NYC_SKP Nov 2013 #16
However, if you know that you can't afford the higher premium, your choice is gone. Gormy Cuss Nov 2013 #18
All true, but please note the context of my first reply and the reply to which I am responding. NYC_SKP Nov 2013 #19
Lots of people making less than $49,000 would LOVE to be able to buy insurance for only $237 geek tragedy Nov 2013 #17
Thank you, Galraedia! Cha Nov 2013 #21
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Obamacare horror story de...»Reply #4