Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

okaawhatever

(9,565 posts)
5. I believe the issue with her wasn't the amount of the subsidies, but that she didn't qualify
Mon Nov 25, 2013, 12:40 AM
Nov 2013

for them (because she qualified for medicaid). The issue is that many people are getting letters saying they don't qualify for the subsidies. The medicaid is government and the subsidies are private/public combination and each are handled by different people, so there can be a time lapse between finding out you don't get the subsidies and finding out it's because your income is below the threshold and you do get Medicaid. This happened more than once in the beginning. I don't think that has happened with people who sign up in person. While I don't doubt Washington state is having a problem with calculations, her claim was she signed up online and was excited about having insurance for the first time in years and then received a letter stating she didn't qualify for the subsidies. She said without the subsidies the plan was too expensive.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

I won't be holding my breath waiting for Rush to make the correction MiniMe Nov 2013 #1
No he won't The Last Dem. Nov 2013 #2
Thanks, journalists still exist. It was a no-brainer, but MSM won't tell the truth. freshwest Nov 2013 #3
So does this mean WA state will be taking back the 8000 letters they sent, including jtuck004 Nov 2013 #4
I believe the issue with her wasn't the amount of the subsidies, but that she didn't qualify okaawhatever Nov 2013 #5
The original story said that her son was signed up for Medicaid, but then she got a letter jtuck004 Nov 2013 #8
Compounded vs. prescriptions? For the son? SoapBox Nov 2013 #6
In her story online that I read, it spoke of her son needing a compounded jtuck004 Nov 2013 #9
This is all so silly. We know who is behind all this bullshit. tofuandbeer Nov 2013 #7
Single-payer. blackspade Nov 2013 #10
ACA = Ghouls subsidized to batten on death & disease bread_and_roses Nov 2013 #11
Chosing the Bronze plan because "you can't afford anything better" would be a mistake. NYC_SKP Nov 2013 #12
So ... "lower income people don't know how to make sound financial decisions" eh? bread_and_roses Nov 2013 #13
Payday loans are never a good idea, quit trying to defend decisions to use them. NYC_SKP Nov 2013 #14
"Let them have Bronze ..." bread_and_roses Nov 2013 #20
Choosing the bronze plan because you can't afford the others is not a mistake. Gormy Cuss Nov 2013 #15
Clarification that should have been obvious: "Monthly premium should not the only criterion." NYC_SKP Nov 2013 #16
However, if you know that you can't afford the higher premium, your choice is gone. Gormy Cuss Nov 2013 #18
All true, but please note the context of my first reply and the reply to which I am responding. NYC_SKP Nov 2013 #19
Lots of people making less than $49,000 would LOVE to be able to buy insurance for only $237 geek tragedy Nov 2013 #17
Thank you, Galraedia! Cha Nov 2013 #21
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Obamacare horror story de...»Reply #5