Latest Breaking News

geardaddy

(25,392 posts)

12. kick and rec

Reply to alp227 (Original post)

Wed Nov 27, 2013, 01:06 PM

Nov 2013

Solidarity!

Click here to purchase valentine hearts!

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

87 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Judge bars protesters from Walmart [View all] alp227 Nov 2013 OP

WalMart's investment in our legal system continues to pay dividends. Scuba Nov 2013 #1

Would it be cheaper to pay employees a living wage Heather MC Nov 2013 #34

Perhaps, but what's the fun if you can't exploit your workers? Scuba Nov 2013 #36

It is easier to screw a million people out of $1 Diego_Native 2012 Nov 2013 #51

Lawyers are on retainer, they'll get paid no matter what, best to use them. Sirveri Nov 2013 #75

Rec for visibility. nt TBF Nov 2013 #2

So much for our legal system being just diabeticman Nov 2013 #3

Judge rules against Constitution HelenWheels Nov 2013 #4

Didn't the Supreme Court rule on this issue bigdarryl Nov 2013 #5

The judge ruled in line with the Supreme Court joeglow3 Nov 2013 #15

NOT on private property, which commercial land is. WinkyDink Nov 2013 #16

I thought it only protected your speech being censored by the government not by corporations? cstanleytech Nov 2013 #25

Isn't Wall-Mart considered private property? AAO Nov 2013 #31

Sidewalks in front of of a business have almost always been legal for protesters!!! Omaha Steve Nov 2013 #39

not if like wamart and you own the land around the business loli phabay Nov 2013 #41

Wrong Omaha Steve Nov 2013 #42

no, right, if its private property then you have no right to trespass, the sidewalks and parking l loli phabay Nov 2013 #43

THe Hinky Dinky strike in the 80's changed NE law Omaha Steve Nov 2013 #45

well dont know about Nebraska, but i have problems with people being allowed to trespass loli phabay Nov 2013 #46

if t isn't fenced it is considered PUBLIC in mst states!!!! Omaha Steve Nov 2013 #47

they should just post it, and if told to leave you should, regardless ofwho or what owns the land loli phabay Nov 2013 #48

So Walmart needs a sign that tells everyone to stay off the required by code sidewalk? Omaha Steve Nov 2013 #50

depends on the layout, the mall near me is all private property loli phabay Nov 2013 #54

Up to the properly line Omaha Steve Nov 2013 #64

Property rights are important to Republicans for sure. Kingofalldems Nov 2013 #52

proprty rights are important to everyone, or do you think its okay for me to walk into your home loli phabay Nov 2013 #53

Come on. Their parking lot is open to the public. Kingofalldems Nov 2013 #55

no the parking lot is open at their discretion, if asked to leave then its trespass if you dont loli phabay Nov 2013 #57

As a Democrat I support the workers. Kingofalldems Nov 2013 #58

i am on the rights of everyone including the property rights of people loli phabay Nov 2013 #60

So you side with billionnaires over people making minimum wage. Kingofalldems Nov 2013 #61

lol, seems that i am for equal rights for all whereas you are happy to pick and choose who gets loli phabay Nov 2013 #62

Yeah I'm a Democrat who is concerned about the rights of workers. Kingofalldems Nov 2013 #63

no, i value the rights of all. loli phabay Nov 2013 #65

For Democrats the rights of workers trump the Kingofalldems Nov 2013 #67

Actually, standing for property rights is not standing for equal rights for all. OrwellwasRight Nov 2013 #69

Hear, hear. Ranchemp. Nov 2013 #79

Air ports are private property in most cases Omaha Steve Nov 2013 #56

no they are pretty much tolerated, but go to dulles and tell me what happens to the buskers there loli phabay Nov 2013 #59

I give up you win Omaha Steve Nov 2013 #66

results of alert Paolo123 Nov 2013 #72

Interesting comment from juror #1. Kingofalldems Nov 2013 #77

yes it is is it not. loli phabay Nov 2013 #80

Interesting comment from him. Ranchemp. Nov 2013 #81

Yes. Property rights are ALWAYS more important than any other rights........ socialist_n_TN Nov 2013 #87

I meant their property, not the cities. AAO Nov 2013 #49

They need to prove they can afford $10,000 worth of free speech first... icymist Nov 2013 #38

If this were government property, not private- then your comment would be apropos. X_Digger Nov 2013 #73

The judge didn't rule against freedom to assemble or freedom of speech, Ranchemp. Nov 2013 #86

constitution mtasselin Nov 2013 #6

I see your point but see my post above the Supreme Court already ruled on this issue of protesting bigdarryl Nov 2013 #8

The Golden Rule Saviolo Nov 2013 #7

So protestors are barred from protesting the company on the company's property? Orrex Nov 2013 #9

that property Niceguy1 Nov 2013 #70

Walmarts property, Walmarts choice.. Township75 Nov 2013 #82

for some here it is.. Niceguy1 Nov 2013 #84

Can they protest in the public sidewalks and streets that surround it, though. I bet they can. ancianita Nov 2013 #10

They can Vincardog Nov 2013 #30

I fucking hate when people want to shit on the Constitution because they hate Walmart joeglow3 Nov 2013 #11

So you are worried about violating Walmart's constitutional rights? rhett o rick Nov 2013 #17

Are you intentionally trying to be obtuse? joeglow3 Nov 2013 #19

You have a Constitutional right to protest on private property? Orrex Nov 2013 #20

You are bullshitting me, right? joeglow3 Nov 2013 #21

Easy there, fireball Orrex Nov 2013 #22

No problem joeglow3 Nov 2013 #23

Speaking of "obtuse", you should read your own posts. I dont need this shit. Go vent rhett o rick Nov 2013 #24

Thank you for answering "Yes" joeglow3 Nov 2013 #27

Wow... bobclark86 Nov 2013 #32

I am not the one with my hair on fire. I simply stated that I was not about to feel sorry for rhett o rick Nov 2013 #37

Yeah, but anyone aware enough to protest should already know the law against doing it on private ancianita Nov 2013 #33

kick and rec geardaddy Nov 2013 #12

He didn't say they couldn't protest. He said they couldn't do it on private property. eggplant Nov 2013 #13

K&R BeatleBoot Nov 2013 #14

They didn't protest correctly Populist_Prole Nov 2013 #18

What this means is that they are very afraid. canoeist52 Nov 2013 #26

This is really a non-story ProudToBeBlueInRhody Nov 2013 #28

How can he demand money from activists about a case brought in September? muriel_volestrangler Nov 2013 #29

Fascism Enthusiast Nov 2013 #35

Message auto-removed Name removed Nov 2013 #40

Just protest on the closest public property, such as the area near the entrance to the store. RBInMaine Nov 2013 #44

Because Walmart needs that $10,000. Major Hogwash Nov 2013 #68

alright then everybody "individually" gopiscrap Nov 2013 #71

Low, low blkmusclmachine Nov 2013 #74

More Articles on this matter: happyslug Nov 2013 #76

No problem with this ruling, Ranchemp. Nov 2013 #78

Indeed, imagine if this were an abortion clinic The Straight Story Nov 2013 #83

I have no doubt that would be the case. Ranchemp. Nov 2013 #85