Latest Breaking News

bobclark86

(1,415 posts)

32. Wow...

Wed Nov 27, 2013, 03:57 PM

Nov 2013

Private property. Chill out and go stand on the sidewalk with the protesters, where they should be. That way, people driving by, rather than just stopping, will see.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

87 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Judge bars protesters from Walmart [View all] alp227 Nov 2013 OP

WalMart's investment in our legal system continues to pay dividends. Scuba Nov 2013 #1

Would it be cheaper to pay employees a living wage Heather MC Nov 2013 #34

Perhaps, but what's the fun if you can't exploit your workers? Scuba Nov 2013 #36

It is easier to screw a million people out of $1 Diego_Native 2012 Nov 2013 #51

Lawyers are on retainer, they'll get paid no matter what, best to use them. Sirveri Nov 2013 #75

Rec for visibility. nt TBF Nov 2013 #2

So much for our legal system being just diabeticman Nov 2013 #3

Judge rules against Constitution HelenWheels Nov 2013 #4

Didn't the Supreme Court rule on this issue bigdarryl Nov 2013 #5

The judge ruled in line with the Supreme Court joeglow3 Nov 2013 #15

NOT on private property, which commercial land is. WinkyDink Nov 2013 #16

I thought it only protected your speech being censored by the government not by corporations? cstanleytech Nov 2013 #25

Isn't Wall-Mart considered private property? AAO Nov 2013 #31

Sidewalks in front of of a business have almost always been legal for protesters!!! Omaha Steve Nov 2013 #39

not if like wamart and you own the land around the business loli phabay Nov 2013 #41

Wrong Omaha Steve Nov 2013 #42

no, right, if its private property then you have no right to trespass, the sidewalks and parking l loli phabay Nov 2013 #43

THe Hinky Dinky strike in the 80's changed NE law Omaha Steve Nov 2013 #45

well dont know about Nebraska, but i have problems with people being allowed to trespass loli phabay Nov 2013 #46

if t isn't fenced it is considered PUBLIC in mst states!!!! Omaha Steve Nov 2013 #47

they should just post it, and if told to leave you should, regardless ofwho or what owns the land loli phabay Nov 2013 #48

So Walmart needs a sign that tells everyone to stay off the required by code sidewalk? Omaha Steve Nov 2013 #50

depends on the layout, the mall near me is all private property loli phabay Nov 2013 #54

Up to the properly line Omaha Steve Nov 2013 #64

Property rights are important to Republicans for sure. Kingofalldems Nov 2013 #52

proprty rights are important to everyone, or do you think its okay for me to walk into your home loli phabay Nov 2013 #53

Come on. Their parking lot is open to the public. Kingofalldems Nov 2013 #55

no the parking lot is open at their discretion, if asked to leave then its trespass if you dont loli phabay Nov 2013 #57

As a Democrat I support the workers. Kingofalldems Nov 2013 #58

i am on the rights of everyone including the property rights of people loli phabay Nov 2013 #60

So you side with billionnaires over people making minimum wage. Kingofalldems Nov 2013 #61

lol, seems that i am for equal rights for all whereas you are happy to pick and choose who gets loli phabay Nov 2013 #62

Yeah I'm a Democrat who is concerned about the rights of workers. Kingofalldems Nov 2013 #63

no, i value the rights of all. loli phabay Nov 2013 #65

For Democrats the rights of workers trump the Kingofalldems Nov 2013 #67

Actually, standing for property rights is not standing for equal rights for all. OrwellwasRight Nov 2013 #69

Hear, hear. Ranchemp. Nov 2013 #79

Air ports are private property in most cases Omaha Steve Nov 2013 #56

no they are pretty much tolerated, but go to dulles and tell me what happens to the buskers there loli phabay Nov 2013 #59

I give up you win Omaha Steve Nov 2013 #66

results of alert Paolo123 Nov 2013 #72

Interesting comment from juror #1. Kingofalldems Nov 2013 #77

yes it is is it not. loli phabay Nov 2013 #80

Interesting comment from him. Ranchemp. Nov 2013 #81

Yes. Property rights are ALWAYS more important than any other rights........ socialist_n_TN Nov 2013 #87

I meant their property, not the cities. AAO Nov 2013 #49

They need to prove they can afford $10,000 worth of free speech first... icymist Nov 2013 #38

If this were government property, not private- then your comment would be apropos. X_Digger Nov 2013 #73

The judge didn't rule against freedom to assemble or freedom of speech, Ranchemp. Nov 2013 #86

constitution mtasselin Nov 2013 #6

I see your point but see my post above the Supreme Court already ruled on this issue of protesting bigdarryl Nov 2013 #8

The Golden Rule Saviolo Nov 2013 #7

So protestors are barred from protesting the company on the company's property? Orrex Nov 2013 #9

that property Niceguy1 Nov 2013 #70

Walmarts property, Walmarts choice.. Township75 Nov 2013 #82

for some here it is.. Niceguy1 Nov 2013 #84

Can they protest in the public sidewalks and streets that surround it, though. I bet they can. ancianita Nov 2013 #10

They can Vincardog Nov 2013 #30

I fucking hate when people want to shit on the Constitution because they hate Walmart joeglow3 Nov 2013 #11

So you are worried about violating Walmart's constitutional rights? rhett o rick Nov 2013 #17

Are you intentionally trying to be obtuse? joeglow3 Nov 2013 #19

You have a Constitutional right to protest on private property? Orrex Nov 2013 #20

You are bullshitting me, right? joeglow3 Nov 2013 #21

Easy there, fireball Orrex Nov 2013 #22

No problem joeglow3 Nov 2013 #23

Speaking of "obtuse", you should read your own posts. I dont need this shit. Go vent rhett o rick Nov 2013 #24

Thank you for answering "Yes" joeglow3 Nov 2013 #27

Wow... bobclark86 Nov 2013 #32

I am not the one with my hair on fire. I simply stated that I was not about to feel sorry for rhett o rick Nov 2013 #37

Yeah, but anyone aware enough to protest should already know the law against doing it on private ancianita Nov 2013 #33

kick and rec geardaddy Nov 2013 #12

He didn't say they couldn't protest. He said they couldn't do it on private property. eggplant Nov 2013 #13

K&R BeatleBoot Nov 2013 #14

They didn't protest correctly Populist_Prole Nov 2013 #18

What this means is that they are very afraid. canoeist52 Nov 2013 #26

This is really a non-story ProudToBeBlueInRhody Nov 2013 #28

How can he demand money from activists about a case brought in September? muriel_volestrangler Nov 2013 #29

Fascism Enthusiast Nov 2013 #35

Message auto-removed Name removed Nov 2013 #40

Just protest on the closest public property, such as the area near the entrance to the store. RBInMaine Nov 2013 #44

Because Walmart needs that $10,000. Major Hogwash Nov 2013 #68

alright then everybody "individually" gopiscrap Nov 2013 #71

Low, low blkmusclmachine Nov 2013 #74

More Articles on this matter: happyslug Nov 2013 #76

No problem with this ruling, Ranchemp. Nov 2013 #78

Indeed, imagine if this were an abortion clinic The Straight Story Nov 2013 #83

I have no doubt that would be the case. Ranchemp. Nov 2013 #85