Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Latest Breaking News
In reply to the discussion: Anger Over US Drone Program In Pakistan Prompts Activists To Reveal Secret Identity Of Spy [View all]polly7
(20,582 posts)38. That's true.
We sobbed.
For the first time ever, there was a public hearing on the human, yes, human cost of drone warfare. For the very first time, the drone debate included on its panel of white male faces a young, brown Yemeni man who spoke clearly but emotionally about how hard it was to reconcile his love for America and Americans with the devastation upon his dear Yemen, and his struggle with informing his community about the goodness of America-- that these drone strikes which are killing innocent people were not representative of the American people. For the first time, Senators were hearing from someone whose job was not to sift through news sources to calibrate numbers of dead people, or somebody who wrote lengthy legal opinions reasoning with murder, or an obvious ex-military apologist for war, cowering behind podiums and office desks. For the first time, Senators saw that the human cost was far beyond dollars and triple digits. It was a mans identity and morals in question, his home and his familys life in jeopardy, his difficulty in both loving a country that has given him so much, but taken away equal amounts.
We can relate to his dilemma.
Farea wasnt there to try to win the hearts and minds of Senate by giving them policy or reform suggestions. He was there to tell his story. But white privilege and its associated subjectivities were clearly in action.
I have been to Yemen, Lindsey Graham said to Farea al-Muslimi. Our blood pressures rose. Isnt your country in turmoil? Graham continued. We have some problems. replied Al-Muslimi. Graham ended his questioning, self-indulgent smirk on his face, as if to say, I rest my case. Although we doubt he is even aware of the terminology, Grahams neo-colonial presumptions about Fareas understanding of his own country were disgusting.
For the first time ever, there was a public hearing on the human, yes, human cost of drone warfare. For the very first time, the drone debate included on its panel of white male faces a young, brown Yemeni man who spoke clearly but emotionally about how hard it was to reconcile his love for America and Americans with the devastation upon his dear Yemen, and his struggle with informing his community about the goodness of America-- that these drone strikes which are killing innocent people were not representative of the American people. For the first time, Senators were hearing from someone whose job was not to sift through news sources to calibrate numbers of dead people, or somebody who wrote lengthy legal opinions reasoning with murder, or an obvious ex-military apologist for war, cowering behind podiums and office desks. For the first time, Senators saw that the human cost was far beyond dollars and triple digits. It was a mans identity and morals in question, his home and his familys life in jeopardy, his difficulty in both loving a country that has given him so much, but taken away equal amounts.
We can relate to his dilemma.
Farea wasnt there to try to win the hearts and minds of Senate by giving them policy or reform suggestions. He was there to tell his story. But white privilege and its associated subjectivities were clearly in action.
I have been to Yemen, Lindsey Graham said to Farea al-Muslimi. Our blood pressures rose. Isnt your country in turmoil? Graham continued. We have some problems. replied Al-Muslimi. Graham ended his questioning, self-indulgent smirk on his face, as if to say, I rest my case. Although we doubt he is even aware of the terminology, Grahams neo-colonial presumptions about Fareas understanding of his own country were disgusting.
Drone Wars: How White Privilege Obscures Real Dialogue
By Noor Mir and Rooj Alwazir
Saturday, April 27, 2013
http://www.zcommunications.org/drone-wars-how-white-privilege-obscures-real-dialogue-by-noor-mir.html
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
68 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Anger Over US Drone Program In Pakistan Prompts Activists To Reveal Secret Identity Of Spy [View all]
Purveyor
Nov 2013
OP
Ha ha yourself. Just because you don't like them doesn't make them marginal or nutcases.
Comrade Grumpy
Nov 2013
#9
Do you give any thought to all of the innocents killed in these drone strikes? nt
polly7
Nov 2013
#14
Ideologues don't care about real people--only about their idealized imaginary friends. nt
Ace Acme
Nov 2013
#15
You need to broaden the scope of your reading material a bit, when it comes to these drones, imho.
polly7
Nov 2013
#25
One may wonder if that same sentiment applies to the thousands of civilians who are too
LanternWaste
Dec 2013
#58
But since the USA defines as a "militant" any military-aged man who happens to find himself killed
Ace Acme
Nov 2013
#24
A succinct and accurate criticism of someone's style and ideas is not an ad hominem fallacy.
Ace Acme
Nov 2013
#40