Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Latest Breaking News
In reply to the discussion: Journal retracts genetically modified corn study that found tumor risk in rats [View all]proverbialwisdom
(4,959 posts)47. Transparency is bad? If that's what you really think, it's s a glaring blindspot in judgement.
http://www.icmje.org/ethical_4conflicts.html
[img]
[/img]
Uniform Requirements for Manuscripts Submitted to Biomedical Journals:
Ethical Considerations in the Conduct and Reporting of Research: Conflicts of Interest
Public trust in the peer-review process and the credibility of published articles depends in part on how well conflict of interest is handled during writing, peer review, and editorial decision making. Conflict of interest exists when an author (or the authors institution), reviewer, or editor has financial or personal relationships that inappropriately influence (bias) his or her actions (such relationships are also known as dual commitments, competing interests, or competing loyalties). These relationships vary from being negligible to having great potential for influencing judgment. Not all relationships represent true conflict of interest. On the other hand, the potential for conflict of interest can exist regardless of whether an individual believes that the relationship affects his or her scientific judgment. Financial relationships (such as employment, consultancies, stock ownership, honoraria, and paid expert testimony) are the most easily identifiable conflicts of interest and the most likely to undermine the credibility of the journal, the authors, and of science itself. However, conflicts can occur for other reasons, such as personal relationships, academic competition, and intellectual passion.
All participants in the peer-review and publication process must disclose all relationships that could be viewed as potential conflicts of interest. Disclosure of such relationships is also important in connection with editorials and review articles, because it can be more difficult to detect bias in these types of publications than in reports of original research. Editors may use information disclosed in conflict-of-interest and financial-interest statements as a basis for editorial decisions. Editors should publish this information if they believe it is important in judging the manuscript.
<>
SEE: Potential Conflicts of Interest Related to Commitments of Editors, Journal Staff, or Reviewers
<>
[img]
[/img]
Uniform Requirements for Manuscripts Submitted to Biomedical Journals:
Ethical Considerations in the Conduct and Reporting of Research: Conflicts of Interest
Public trust in the peer-review process and the credibility of published articles depends in part on how well conflict of interest is handled during writing, peer review, and editorial decision making. Conflict of interest exists when an author (or the authors institution), reviewer, or editor has financial or personal relationships that inappropriately influence (bias) his or her actions (such relationships are also known as dual commitments, competing interests, or competing loyalties). These relationships vary from being negligible to having great potential for influencing judgment. Not all relationships represent true conflict of interest. On the other hand, the potential for conflict of interest can exist regardless of whether an individual believes that the relationship affects his or her scientific judgment. Financial relationships (such as employment, consultancies, stock ownership, honoraria, and paid expert testimony) are the most easily identifiable conflicts of interest and the most likely to undermine the credibility of the journal, the authors, and of science itself. However, conflicts can occur for other reasons, such as personal relationships, academic competition, and intellectual passion.
All participants in the peer-review and publication process must disclose all relationships that could be viewed as potential conflicts of interest. Disclosure of such relationships is also important in connection with editorials and review articles, because it can be more difficult to detect bias in these types of publications than in reports of original research. Editors may use information disclosed in conflict-of-interest and financial-interest statements as a basis for editorial decisions. Editors should publish this information if they believe it is important in judging the manuscript.
<>
SEE: Potential Conflicts of Interest Related to Commitments of Editors, Journal Staff, or Reviewers
<>
A tremendous number of articles have been written on the subject of COI (which may or may not influence objectivity) and disclosure. Check it out.
GOOGLE: COI conflicts of interest definition
eg. http://www.ncsl.org/research/ethics/50-state-table-conflict-of-interest-definitions.aspx
GOOGLE: COI science journals
eg. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11349360
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19934424
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
64 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Journal retracts genetically modified corn study that found tumor risk in rats [View all]
Archae
Nov 2013
OP
I remember asking my microbiology instructor if GMO crops are dangerous to humans
darkangel218
Nov 2013
#1
I think everything should be labeled with how its made and where its from and whats in it.
7962
Nov 2013
#24
Many studies of biotech food suggest problems more widespread than the role of glycophosphate.
proverbialwisdom
Nov 2013
#21
If the combination of mutation plant DNA with our DNA is not the cause of concern, than what it is?
darkangel218
Nov 2013
#31
All creatures of biology use the easiest and quickest routes to acquire building blocks for growth
nolabels
Dec 2013
#56
GM WATCH Press Release: Journal retraction of Séralini study is illicit, unscientific, and unethical
proverbialwisdom
Nov 2013
#3
Don't miss this documenting the tremendous support garnered by the study among many scientists.
proverbialwisdom
Nov 2013
#7
Study: Monsanto's Roundup Herbicide Linked to Cancer, Autism, Parkinson's
CountAllVotes
Nov 2013
#11
It says there are synergistic effects, things don't in general have single causes.
bemildred
Nov 2013
#20
Finally. Can't believe it was published to start with. Junk 'science' at it worst
idwiyo
Nov 2013
#18
Shrugging ain't enough, as GMOs are in at least 8 classes of food and now the "creators" of GMO fish
drynberg
Nov 2013
#29
MUST READ. Bottom, retraction letter; top, gmwatch press release (irrefutably measured/reasonable).
proverbialwisdom
Nov 2013
#36
To be honest I am more interested in what the science says but hey if it floats your boat
cstanleytech
Nov 2013
#40
Transparency is bad? If that's what you really think, it's s a glaring blindspot in judgement.
proverbialwisdom
Dec 2013
#47