Latest Breaking News

Ace Acme

(1,464 posts)

38. But you can't remember what was the source for the claim that Abdulrahman al Awlaki

Sun Dec 8, 2013, 07:20 PM

Dec 2013

"was in the company of terrorists".

How do you know who he was in the company of? Who said? Who did an investigation? How do they know?

You can't remember? All you remember is that it was "nothing to see here, folks, move on--national security terrorist stuff"?

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

63 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Edward Snowden to give evidence to EU parliament, says MEP. [View all] dipsydoodle Dec 2013 OP

yay for Snowden n/t cosmicone Dec 2013 #1

I second that.... deurbano Dec 2013 #2

His views on civil liberties and justice are well worth hearing. ronnie624 Dec 2013 #3

Steps will be taken to prevent a drone attack! Divernan Dec 2013 #4

If he is still inside russia I dont see there being much if any chance of a drone strike being cstanleytech Dec 2013 #9

What terrorist acts did Abdulrahman al Awlaki commit? I forget. Ace Acme Dec 2013 #11

None that I am aware of and its a tragic death that his father could have avoided cstanleytech Dec 2013 #13

What makes you think his father was dragging him around? nt Ace Acme Dec 2013 #15

So then you have other information to explain why a 15 year old boy was hanging cstanleytech Dec 2013 #18

How do you know who he was hanging around? Ace Acme Dec 2013 #22

What? You think they went and targeted the kid on purpose? If so then I am going to have to ask cstanleytech Dec 2013 #25

IOW, you have no idea who he was hanging around. Ace Acme Dec 2013 #26

Do you have any proof that shows otherwise or are you merely trying to stir the pot? cstanleytech Dec 2013 #29

Thanks for demonstrating yet again that you have no idea who he was hanging around. nt Ace Acme Dec 2013 #31

Ahhh ok thanks for answering it makes it easier to understand your real goal now. nt cstanleytech Dec 2013 #33

My goal was to show that you make up your facts. QED nt Ace Acme Dec 2013 #34

Uh huh sure it is. nt cstanleytech Dec 2013 #43

Who was in the company of terrorists wanted by America hack89 Dec 2013 #19

How do you know who he was in the company of? nt Ace Acme Dec 2013 #23

Because we know who he was killed with? hack89 Dec 2013 #24

How do you know who he was killed with? Ace Acme Dec 2013 #27

So you didn't follow the story when it happened? hack89 Dec 2013 #30

Oh, so "numerous DU threads" is your source. nt Ace Acme Dec 2013 #32

You are right - Obama simply wanted him dead hack89 Dec 2013 #35

I didn't say that. I asked how you knew he was in the company of terrorists. Ace Acme Dec 2013 #36

Don't play dumb hack89 Dec 2013 #37

But you can't remember what was the source for the claim that Abdulrahman al Awlaki Ace Acme Dec 2013 #38

Ok. Nt hack89 Dec 2013 #39

If already discussed, why can't you support claim that he was in the company of terrorists? nt Ace Acme Dec 2013 #42

The issue isnt what he can support its that if you can support the claim that you are raising that cstanleytech Dec 2013 #44

I'm not raising any claim. You are claiming you know who he was hanging around with Ace Acme Dec 2013 #45

Incorrect. The government did that. And yes by your tone that is precisely what you are trying to cstanleytech Dec 2013 #46

Oh, and you are blindly repeating the government claim?` Ace Acme Dec 2013 #49

"What information did the government provide?" More than you but hey continue on this path and cstanleytech Dec 2013 #50

I'm not claiming I know who he was hanging out with. You are, and you're claiming the gov't knew. Ace Acme Dec 2013 #51

I'm not making anything up I am pointing out that facts that the news media reported cstanleytech Dec 2013 #52

It's not my job to disprove anything. Ace Acme Dec 2013 #53

Oh so we have to prove what the media the media and government say but cstanleytech Dec 2013 #59

This COULD be interesting. pangaia Dec 2013 #5

K&R'd snot Dec 2013 #6

Comrade Snowden, the former American SoapBox Dec 2013 #7

Pathetic bile. n/t Comrade Grumpy Dec 2013 #8

Sssh! Turbineguy Dec 2013 #10

Don't take it so personally. Wilms Dec 2013 #12

+1 idwiyo Dec 2013 #62

I would think there would be a point when you'd be embarrassed to post such drivel. last1standing Dec 2013 #14

Snowden restored my conviction that true heroes still exist. Psephos Dec 2013 #16

Your web belt has verdigris in the eyelets, Cummings. nt Ace Acme Dec 2013 #17

Snowden is a traitor BlueInPhilly Dec 2013 #20

I suppose you feel the same way about Daniel Ellsberg? nt Ace Acme Dec 2013 #28

If Obama had been president? JoeyT Dec 2013 #40

Ellsberg had proof. All Snowden has is personal distaste. randome Dec 2013 #61

Greens in Euro Parliament are rather awesome BelgianMadCow Dec 2013 #21

restores faith there's intelligent life on this planet, at least enough to have a voice when it 2banon Dec 2013 #55

k & r for Snowden. n/t wildbilln864 Dec 2013 #41

So as it turns out he *CAN* testify by web video... Blue_Tires Dec 2013 #47

Because he had a deal with putin to keep his mouth shut. cstanleytech Dec 2013 #48

I would suppose it would depend defacto7 Dec 2013 #54

Which is why snowden might decline to testify as he might fear Putins reaction and we all cstanleytech Dec 2013 #58

knr Douglas Carpenter Dec 2013 #56

Is he technically a traitor or not? nilesobek Dec 2013 #57

Legally? Probably or atleast if we follow our own laws which lets face it cstanleytech Dec 2013 #60

k&r idwiyo Dec 2013 #63