Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

cstanleytech

(28,155 posts)
52. I'm not making anything up I am pointing out that facts that the news media reported
Sun Dec 8, 2013, 11:51 PM
Dec 2013

based upon what the government told them.
Now do you or do you not have any shred of evidence to disprove the stories? Yes or no Ace.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

yay for Snowden n/t cosmicone Dec 2013 #1
I second that.... deurbano Dec 2013 #2
His views on civil liberties and justice are well worth hearing. ronnie624 Dec 2013 #3
Steps will be taken to prevent a drone attack! Divernan Dec 2013 #4
If he is still inside russia I dont see there being much if any chance of a drone strike being cstanleytech Dec 2013 #9
What terrorist acts did Abdulrahman al Awlaki commit? I forget. Ace Acme Dec 2013 #11
None that I am aware of and its a tragic death that his father could have avoided cstanleytech Dec 2013 #13
What makes you think his father was dragging him around? nt Ace Acme Dec 2013 #15
So then you have other information to explain why a 15 year old boy was hanging cstanleytech Dec 2013 #18
How do you know who he was hanging around? Ace Acme Dec 2013 #22
What? You think they went and targeted the kid on purpose? If so then I am going to have to ask cstanleytech Dec 2013 #25
IOW, you have no idea who he was hanging around. Ace Acme Dec 2013 #26
Do you have any proof that shows otherwise or are you merely trying to stir the pot? cstanleytech Dec 2013 #29
Thanks for demonstrating yet again that you have no idea who he was hanging around. nt Ace Acme Dec 2013 #31
Ahhh ok thanks for answering it makes it easier to understand your real goal now. nt cstanleytech Dec 2013 #33
My goal was to show that you make up your facts. QED nt Ace Acme Dec 2013 #34
Uh huh sure it is. nt cstanleytech Dec 2013 #43
Who was in the company of terrorists wanted by America hack89 Dec 2013 #19
How do you know who he was in the company of? nt Ace Acme Dec 2013 #23
Because we know who he was killed with? hack89 Dec 2013 #24
How do you know who he was killed with? Ace Acme Dec 2013 #27
So you didn't follow the story when it happened? hack89 Dec 2013 #30
Oh, so "numerous DU threads" is your source. nt Ace Acme Dec 2013 #32
You are right - Obama simply wanted him dead hack89 Dec 2013 #35
I didn't say that. I asked how you knew he was in the company of terrorists. Ace Acme Dec 2013 #36
Don't play dumb hack89 Dec 2013 #37
But you can't remember what was the source for the claim that Abdulrahman al Awlaki Ace Acme Dec 2013 #38
Ok. Nt hack89 Dec 2013 #39
If already discussed, why can't you support claim that he was in the company of terrorists? nt Ace Acme Dec 2013 #42
The issue isnt what he can support its that if you can support the claim that you are raising that cstanleytech Dec 2013 #44
I'm not raising any claim. You are claiming you know who he was hanging around with Ace Acme Dec 2013 #45
Incorrect. The government did that. And yes by your tone that is precisely what you are trying to cstanleytech Dec 2013 #46
Oh, and you are blindly repeating the government claim?` Ace Acme Dec 2013 #49
"What information did the government provide?" More than you but hey continue on this path and cstanleytech Dec 2013 #50
I'm not claiming I know who he was hanging out with. You are, and you're claiming the gov't knew. Ace Acme Dec 2013 #51
I'm not making anything up I am pointing out that facts that the news media reported cstanleytech Dec 2013 #52
It's not my job to disprove anything. Ace Acme Dec 2013 #53
Oh so we have to prove what the media the media and government say but cstanleytech Dec 2013 #59
This COULD be interesting. pangaia Dec 2013 #5
K&R'd snot Dec 2013 #6
Comrade Snowden, the former American SoapBox Dec 2013 #7
Pathetic bile. n/t Comrade Grumpy Dec 2013 #8
Sssh! Turbineguy Dec 2013 #10
Don't take it so personally. Wilms Dec 2013 #12
+1 idwiyo Dec 2013 #62
I would think there would be a point when you'd be embarrassed to post such drivel. last1standing Dec 2013 #14
Snowden restored my conviction that true heroes still exist. Psephos Dec 2013 #16
Your web belt has verdigris in the eyelets, Cummings. nt Ace Acme Dec 2013 #17
Snowden is a traitor BlueInPhilly Dec 2013 #20
I suppose you feel the same way about Daniel Ellsberg? nt Ace Acme Dec 2013 #28
If Obama had been president? JoeyT Dec 2013 #40
Ellsberg had proof. All Snowden has is personal distaste. randome Dec 2013 #61
Greens in Euro Parliament are rather awesome BelgianMadCow Dec 2013 #21
restores faith there's intelligent life on this planet, at least enough to have a voice when it 2banon Dec 2013 #55
k & r for Snowden. n/t wildbilln864 Dec 2013 #41
So as it turns out he *CAN* testify by web video... Blue_Tires Dec 2013 #47
Because he had a deal with putin to keep his mouth shut. cstanleytech Dec 2013 #48
I would suppose it would depend defacto7 Dec 2013 #54
Which is why snowden might decline to testify as he might fear Putins reaction and we all cstanleytech Dec 2013 #58
knr Douglas Carpenter Dec 2013 #56
Is he technically a traitor or not? nilesobek Dec 2013 #57
Legally? Probably or atleast if we follow our own laws which lets face it cstanleytech Dec 2013 #60
k&r idwiyo Dec 2013 #63
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Edward Snowden to give ev...»Reply #52