Latest Breaking News
In reply to the discussion: Elizabeth Warren: ‘I am not running for president' [View all]MADem
(135,425 posts)desired effect--it only makes you look bad.
Here, let me help you out: You're=you are; your=belonging to you.
The lecture on "comprehending the English language" and "maybe you are not schooled in the English language" is quite rich, seeing as you are the one having trouble with your (i.e. belonging to you, in this case) very first word in your thread title.
You don't get to tell me to "move on" nor do you get to tell me what a "real Democrat" is. Most Democrats I know don't fling insults like you do when they don't get their way or someone doesn't agree with their world-view. In fact, you're (see, that's "you are" in this case) the meanest, most insulting Democrat I've encountered in quite some time. Why do my views cause you to respond in such a bitter and nasty fashion? You aren't changing my mind by calling me names, insulting my language skills, telling me I'm "batting 100," "drinking Kool Aid," or other childish comments. In fact, you're (that's "you are", there) just creating a very negative impression of yourself, one that you'll have to live with.
FWIW, the New Republic article, the one that every subsequent article with the faux "Warren v. Clinton" themes was based upon, a right wing seed attempt if I ever saw one, was published on November 10 (it was out on the internet a good week before the publication date). Today is December 10, and two days ago, on Sunday morning, Elizabeth Warren appeared on both local Boston ABC and CBS outlets and repeated on both programs that she's not running.
As a constituent of the Senator, I still believe that she means what she says.