Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Remind me please how exactly can a state ban any federal agency without violating the constitution? cstanleytech Dec 2013 #1
It may put the NSA into a position pipoman Dec 2013 #4
.They can't "ban" them, but what they can do is Ranchemp. Dec 2013 #6
They can't do that either--nullification doesn't work for either side. nt geek tragedy Dec 2013 #7
Yeah they can. Ranchemp. Dec 2013 #9
Refusing to deploy resources is different from banning the NSA from operating in the state nt geek tragedy Dec 2013 #16
And I said in my earlier post that they can't ban them, but they can make it Ranchemp. Dec 2013 #18
Withholding water and electricity is nullification, not refusing cooperation. nt geek tragedy Dec 2013 #19
If we are talking about things under the control of the State, yes the State can ban them happyslug Dec 2013 #10
The feds however do have control over federal funds and how much the states get cstanleytech Dec 2013 #17
The feds also have supreme jurisdiction over the electric grid and the water supply. geek tragedy Dec 2013 #21
Why do that, all the Federal Government has to do is refused to transmit electricity to Arizona happyslug Dec 2013 #25
Read up on McCulloch vs Maryland. geek tragedy Dec 2013 #29
But can the Federal Government ORDER a state to do something? happyslug Dec 2013 #30
Yes, per the supremacy clause. nt geek tragedy Dec 2013 #31
The Supremacy clause only comes into play when they is a direct conflict happyslug Dec 2013 #33
None of that takes away from the fact that a state cannot interfere with geek tragedy Dec 2013 #35
So was the refusal of the Plaintiff Sheriffs to follow Federal law. happyslug Dec 2013 #36
The federal government cannot commandeer state resources to enforce federal statutes. geek tragedy Dec 2013 #37
What is state resources??? happyslug Dec 2013 #38
public utilities are n.ot resources of the state government geek tragedy Dec 2013 #39
Sorry, but the idea that states can cut off water and electricity to the enforcement of laws they geek tragedy Dec 2013 #20
My point was restricted to actual ownership of such services happyslug Dec 2013 #24
So, in your view, a state could cut off electricity geek tragedy Dec 2013 #26
If you could get around the concept that a public utility must serve all people in their area. happyslug Dec 2013 #27
You're greatly exaggerating state authority. geek tragedy Dec 2013 #28
I am following the Supreme Court happyslug Dec 2013 #34
NSA has managed to piss off both the left and the right. dixiegrrrrl Dec 2013 #2
So then all their defense would EC Dec 2013 #3
The NSA is hardly "all their defense".. pipoman Dec 2013 #5
Won't be upheld. The way to attack NSA is through Congress. Shrike47 Dec 2013 #8
More idiotic political grandstanding Coyotl Dec 2013 #11
Which wouldn't be possible if so many Dems weren't defending it. JoeyT Dec 2013 #12
Exactly. Indi Guy Dec 2013 #14
Because, you see, Internet traffic is bounded by the borders of AZ. LOL n/t jtuck004 Dec 2013 #13
That's rich, a GOPer worried about the constitution groundloop Dec 2013 #15
The person is a Tenther. nt geek tragedy Dec 2013 #22
A good start. blkmusclmachine Dec 2013 #23
FWIW, Ward is also the genius who proposed Blue_Tires Dec 2013 #32
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»New Legislation Would Ban...»Reply #34