Judge says giant cross must be removed from San Diego mountain

[Nika]

59. We had a similar controversy with the old tall cross on Skinner's butte near the center of Eugene...

... Oregon. It took many years for that fight to be resolved, but the cross was moved to a new hillside home at a Bible college. A large flagpole was erected to replace it, as the cross was allegedly a war memorial as well, and that filled that void in the scheme of things of that controversy.

I suggest they move this 59 year old cross, put a more neutral replacement for a memorial to Korean, and move on. not all people who served in the Korean War we Christian. Which makes me think this too was an excuse, calling a religious icon a memorial when it in face was never that primarily.

Cross controversy[edit]


The Skinner Butte Cross at New Hope Christian College (formerly Eugene Bible College)

From the opinion of the 9th Federal Circuit Court,[8] the official history of this controversy is as follows
:
The City of Eugene ("City&quot maintains a public park on and around Skinner's Butte [sic], a hill cresting immediately north of the City's downtown business district. The land was donated to the City and has been maintained as a public park for many years. From the late 1930s to 1964, private individuals erected a succession of wooden crosses in the park, one replacing another as they deteriorated. In 1964, private individuals erected the cross at issue in this litigation. It is a fifty-one foot concrete Latin cross with neon inset tubing, and it is located at the crest of Skinner's Butte. The parties who erected the cross did not seek the City's permission to do so beforehand; however, they subsequently applied for and received from the City a building permit and an electrical permit.
Since 1970, the City has illuminated the cross for seven days during the Christmas season, five days during the Thanksgiving season, and on Memorial Day, Independence Day, and Veteran's Day.

The cross has been the subject of litigation since the time it was erected. In 1969, the Oregon Supreme Court held that the cross violated both the federal and the Oregon Constitutions because it was erected with a religious purpose and created the inference of official endorsement of Christianity. Lowe v. City of Eugene, 463 P.2d 360, 362-63 (Or. 1969), cert. denied, 397 U.S. 1042 , reh'g denied, 398 U.S. 944 (1970). Soon after, the City held a charter amendment election, and on May 26, 1970, the voters, by a wide margin, approved an amendment to the City Charter designating the cross a war memorial. Pursuant to that amendment, the cross was deeded to the City as a gift, and a bronze plaque was placed at the foot of the cross dedicating it as a memorial to war veterans. The Eugene City Charter provides that the "concrete cross on the south slope of the butte shall remain at that location and in that form as property of the city and is hereby dedicated as a memorial to the veterans of all wars in which the United States has participated."

On June 14, 1997 and as a result of the 9th Federal Circuit's ruling, the cross was subsequently removed and reinstalled at Eugene Bible College near Churchill High School and a flagpole flying an American flag was erected in its place. U.S. Representative from Oregon Charles O. Porter was one of the people who had advocated for the removal of the cross.[9]
See also[edit]

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Skinner_Butte