Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Latest Breaking News
In reply to the discussion: 26 Senators Defy Obama, Back Iran Sanctions Bill [View all]karynnj
(61,094 posts)31. NO NO NO - that is the chairmen's letter - the people who are AGAINST the Menendez bill
(read the second page of the ABC article)
Note these are 10 of the most important Senators there are and Reid has blocked the bill. I assume that they will be able to keep enough support - even if they have to use their positions - and they have a lot of power.
In fact, I think Boxer could even take SFRC away from Menendez when they reorganize after Nov 2014 - if she wanted to. She beats him on seniority - but wanted to keep the environmental chair.
Here are the people behind this ridiculous bill:
The Democratic co-sponsors are Sens. Charles Schumer (N.Y.), Ben Cardin (Md.), Bob Casey Jr. (Pa.), Chris Coons (Del.), Mark Begich (Alaska), Richard Blumenthal (Conn.), Mary Landrieu (La.), Kirsten Gillibrand (N.Y.), Mark Pryor (Ark.), Mark Warner (Va.), Kay Hagan (N.C.), and Joe Donnelly (Ind.).
Every Democrat considered vulnerable in his or her race for reelection next year is co-sponsoring this measure, a sign that they want to appear tough on foreign policy.
The Republican co-sponsors are Sens. Lindsey Graham (S.C.), John McCain (Ariz.), Marco Rubio (Fla.), John Cornyn (Texas), Kelly Ayotte (N.H.), Bob Corker (Tenn.), Susan Collins (Maine), Jerry Moran (Kan.), Pat Roberts (Kan.), Mike Johanns (Neb.), Ted Cruz (Texas), and Roy Blunt (Mo.).
http://thehill.com/blogs/global-affairs/middle-east-north-africa/193669-dems-divided-on-tougher-iran-sanctions-as-bill
My comment - "tough" or in sync with AIPAC?
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
58 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Schumer is an unprincipled panderer on Israel who knows better. Menendez is just a neocon asshat
geek tragedy
Dec 2013
#49
NO NO NO - that is the chairmen's letter - the people who are AGAINST the Menendez bill
karynnj
Dec 2013
#31
They can "compel" Obama to start or join a war? Based on a foreign country's wishes?
TwilightGardener
Dec 2013
#5
Congress declares war, Commander in Chief tells military to stand down?
Voice for Peace
Dec 2013
#19
Don't know either. That would be a crisis. There'd have to be a military coup.
TwilightGardener
Dec 2013
#20
President is Commander in Chief, he could tell Congress to go fight it themselves. nt
geek tragedy
Dec 2013
#23
The point is there is no reason to do this now -- and it could derail negotiations
karynnj
Dec 2013
#28
I would imagine that Secretary Kerry who has regulary spoken with the Iranian FM and Obama
karynnj
Dec 2013
#38
I agree with pretty much everything you say, but do agree that now might not be the time.
painesghost
Dec 2013
#34
Until they propose Sanctions against Saudi Arabia, then they should STFU.
Blue State Bandit
Dec 2013
#21
It is because of things like this why I do not send money to the DNC anymore
lostincalifornia
Dec 2013
#52
This is the nonsense the President has been up against since 2008. Does anyone really think single
lostincalifornia
Dec 2013
#51
Senate makes move toward vote on Iran sanctions bill despite Obama threat to veto
Jesus Malverde
Dec 2013
#55
White House to Senate Dems: Your Iran sanctions bill makes war more likely
Jesus Malverde
Dec 2013
#56