Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

red dog 1

(33,136 posts)
10. Obama's Justice Department Should Be Going After Real Criminals....(like gang stalkers)
Wed Dec 21, 2011, 12:00 AM
Dec 2011

Since he took office in 2009, Obama and his DOJ have totally ignored the pleas of hundreds of thousands of victims of organized stalking, also known as "gang" stalking.
Letters, e-mails, & phone calls to DOJ and the White House on the subject of organized stalking go unanswered.
Stalking victims reporting multiple stalkers are refused any help by the Office for Victims of Crime (OVC), which is part of DOJ.
("OVC does not provide any direct assistance to victims of multi-stalking incidents&quot

In a 2009 DOJ Special Report "Stalking Victimization in the United States".
(Pub # NCJ 224527), the Justice Department estimated that the number of stalking victims who reported multiple stalkers during the 12 month study period to be in excess of 180,000.
However, Freedom Of Information Act documents prove that the 180,000 figure is artificially low; and that the actual number of victims reporting multiple stalkers during the 12 month study period is between 500,000 and 600,000....Three times the figure estimated by DOJ!
http://www.nowpublic.com/world/gang-stalking-new-doj-foia-documents-prove-doj-knows-truth/

Why would DOJ not want the American people to know the true extent of this type of stalking?

Why has DOJ never prosecuted a multi'-stalker case?

The methods used by the criminals who engage in organized stalking closely match those methods used by the FBI decades ago in the COINTELPRO program, which was determined to be illegal by Congress and was supposed to have been shut down in 1971.
However, many former intelligence agents claim that COINTELPRO was NOT shut down, but continues to this day, "under a new code name, more sophisticated , with access to modern weapons"
http://www.examiner.com/human-rights-in-national/let-s-kill-all-the-good-guys/
http://www.boblevin.org/
http://www.examiner.com/civil-rights-in-cleveland/cointelpro-evidence-collected-by-bob-s-attorney/

So, not only is Obama's Justice Department in total denial about organized stalking...it might well actually be INVOLVED in organized stalking, and the American taxpayer might be paying for it all, with no Congressional oversight, since COINTELPRO was, (and still probably is,) a "black-budget program" hidden deep within the intelligence community.

Obama, Holder, and DOJ are spending taxpayer dollars to go after voter approved medical pot dispensaries....but they won't spend a dime to investigate organized stalking, which they don't even consider to be a crime at all, in spite of the fact that their own documents prove it to be a very real crime with 1/2 million very real victims each year.

if the many reports from former intelligence officers are true, namely, that secret, illegal COINTELPRO type operations are still taking place, and that the United States Government itself is in some way involved in organized stalking, Obama, Holder, and other top Administration officials are subject to prosecution themselves, and the Republicans would have a field day if that ever happens.

Best and most informative website on organized stalking is:
http://www.multistalkervictims.org/

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Must make way for the New big pharma canaboid pills!! comipinko Dec 2011 #1
They have the mono-pot-ly on medicinal marajuana KansDem Dec 2011 #4
sad news, more backwards motion from this corporatist administration. Civilization2 Dec 2011 #2
Shredding any pretense of "states rights" ~nt 99th_Monkey Dec 2011 #27
Disgusting! Webster Green Dec 2011 #3
Depressing. k&r for exposure. n/t Laelth Dec 2011 #5
Once again the Obama administration has succeeded where the Bush Administration has failed Freddie Stubbs Dec 2011 #6
lol closeupready Dec 2011 #15
C'mon, don't you all feel safer knowing that fewer cancer partients are gonna be able to get high? abq e streeter Dec 2011 #7
I am not cheerleading the government on this. randome Dec 2011 #8
Obama "silent" on MMJ policy, my eye. Actions speak WAY louder than any words. nt Romulox Dec 2011 #9
Obama's Justice Department Should Be Going After Real Criminals....(like gang stalkers) red dog 1 Dec 2011 #10
k&r n/t RainDog Dec 2011 #11
Break enough laws, and you will get shut down. boppers Dec 2011 #12
What laws were broken? Webster Green Dec 2011 #14
Sorry, didn't link to all the articles (I had read about 15). boppers Dec 2011 #21
The state laws are at odds with the federal laws. Webster Green Dec 2011 #28
Thank You for setting this straight Webster and I am furious at Obama too. Mojeoux Dec 2011 #32
"They claim there are no medicinal benefits to cannabis" is FALSE. boppers Dec 2011 #33
The DEA claims just that, and they are part of the executive branch of the government. Webster Green Dec 2011 #34
Selling pot is not illegal, nor is dispensing it. boppers Dec 2011 #36
Wow! A blatent lie? Webster Green Dec 2011 #39
The derived synthesis you posit is simply not in their literature. boppers Dec 2011 #40
You are just wrong. Webster Green Dec 2011 #41
Wow, to say the Feds disrespect and deny the health benifits makes me a "blatant" liar? Mojeoux Dec 2011 #43
This message was self-deleted by its author Webster Green Dec 2011 #45
This message was self-deleted by its author Webster Green Dec 2011 #46
You are incorrect about how drugs are scheduled. boppers Dec 2011 #49
fail Webster Green Dec 2011 #54
"The derived synthesis you posit" Webster Green Dec 2011 #47
I was trying to explain how you possibly wound up making a common logic error. boppers Dec 2011 #48
You are indeed hopeless Webster Green Dec 2011 #52
Crock o'crap i_sometimes Dec 2011 #24
They claimed to be a non-profit. boppers Dec 2011 #26
I read the article... i_sometimes Dec 2011 #18
See #21. boppers Dec 2011 #22
Too easy... i_sometimes Dec 2011 #23
You can claim to be non-profit, but that doesn't make it true. boppers Dec 2011 #25
Lol, a park? i_sometimes Dec 2011 #31
$25 an ounce? Webster Green Dec 2011 #35
I grew up in Tucson. boppers Dec 2011 #37
It is not cheap or easy to produce the quality of product available in the dipensaries. Webster Green Dec 2011 #38
I have no idea what growing up in Tucson has to do with this dialog. Webster Green Dec 2011 #42
You can buy a $1,500 bottle of wine, or a $1 bottle. boppers Dec 2011 #50
Nobody that I know is that fucking stupid. Webster Green Dec 2011 #55
It's not about more or less taxes, it's about using our tax dollars effectively. Shoe Horn Dec 2011 #13
What bullshit. Hell Hath No Fury Dec 2011 #16
Maybe if Pot Clubs started buying lobbyists by the truckload? [nt] Shoe Horn Dec 2011 #17
all they are doing is decreasing sales tax revenues noiretextatique Dec 2011 #19
Along with the federal government, biig pharma has it's hands in all of these crackdowns. sarcasmo Dec 2011 #20
It's great to know.. sendero Dec 2011 #29
kick QC Dec 2011 #30
This message was self-deleted by its author sarcasmo Dec 2011 #44
Sick people tooeyeten Dec 2011 #51
All I can say is Praise the Lord AlwaysQuestion Dec 2011 #53
did you leave off the sarcasm thingie on that rant? hobbit709 Dec 2011 #56
Just a bunch of misguided Marin county hot-tubbers Brother Buzz Dec 2011 #57
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Feds Shut Down Marin Pot ...»Reply #10