This message was self-deleted by its author

[SpectorGrowl]

68. "Whatever."

Your apathy encapsulates perfectly the liberal cause's lack of vigor, fire, and determination to win, but that's an entirely different discussion.

Even if the majority of the D's will line right up and lick the boots of HRC, your argument for her electability is nothing more than argumentum ad populum. You postulate an outcome predicated on your opinion that that belief is widely held, but opinion itself does not determine truth. The fact that there are several dissenting views within this discussion is proof that your so-called "truth" is subject to probability, not certainty. Even if there is a high probability that Hillary would win, your statement cannot, logically, be sound; not only because the answer can't be known prior to the end of the election, but because you can't claim consensus in a universe where countervailing perspectives also have a chance at being correct.