Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

catchnrelease

(2,155 posts)
25. A similar case
Fri Dec 27, 2013, 03:33 PM
Dec 2013

Several years ago my husband was on a jury in a similar case. A 4 year old had had a tonsillectomy, and came out of the surgery ok, but afterwards somehow became oxygen deprived and was severely brain damaged. (Not brain dead). At the time of the trial, the boy was around 12 yrs old. The hospital (Children's Hosp in Los Angeles), surgeon, nurses and anesthesiologist were being sued.

The family was asking for full 24 hr care, a new home for him/them to live in, a new van to transport him, expenses to have him educated through college--even though he was too brain damaged to have the capacity to understand anything going on around him--and what his lifetime earnings might have been. It was estimated at that time, that he had about a 3 yr life expectancy. At the time of his death, everything from the settlement would go to his mother. So these are the kinds of damages that can be sued for. I don't know if it would make a difference since this girl is actually brain dead, as to how far they can go with what they want.

The mother's attorney was trying to say that someone was negligent, but after all of the evidence was shown, expert testimony given etc, it could not be proved that anyone did anything wrong. My husband said that the jury was very sympathetic, and really wanted to give the mother something to help, but they could not find for her. (He said that there had been some kind of care offered to the boy before the trial, but the mother had refused the offer. I don't recall if the offer was from the hospital, or doctors or ?.) The anesthesiologist was going to have to go through another trial because it was felt he could not be completely exonerated, and might possibly have done something wrong. Not proved that he was negligent but he was still on the hook so to speak.

It's such a sad situation, I hope this family is not being taken advantage of by vultures looking to make some money off of their tragedy.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

this is just so sad dlwickham Dec 2013 #1
Not just money for the other facility cosmicone Dec 2013 #2
I could be mistaken, but won't they have to prove wrongful death? magical thyme Dec 2013 #5
Death is not necessary for a malpractice suit cosmicone Dec 2013 #13
It is also possible that the doctors did not deviate from accepted practices karynnj Dec 2013 #21
It was probably cosmicone Dec 2013 #26
she hemmorrhaged magical thyme Dec 2013 #30
??? I would assume that any damage award truebluegreen Dec 2013 #12
True however cosmicone Dec 2013 #14
So are you saying that the family wants to get a longer truebluegreen Dec 2013 #22
A similar case catchnrelease Dec 2013 #25
Can you possibly be more cynical or heartless? karynnj Dec 2013 #17
Please read my post #16 cosmicone Dec 2013 #19
Interesting development. Jesus Malverde Dec 2013 #3
this has gone from tragically stupid to venal and macabre. Warren Stupidity Dec 2013 #4
Yes - from reading #3 above LiberalElite Dec 2013 #6
I'm an organ donor SCVDem Dec 2013 #7
I know cosmicone Dec 2013 #18
IMO, they'd be better served investigating why she was given surgery for apnea in the first place. Brickbat Dec 2013 #8
I believe that it was related to the fact that she was obese. grantcart Dec 2013 #11
I find it hard to believe that they went through weight-loss and CPAP options so quickly. Brickbat Dec 2013 #29
Terri Schiavo Lasher Dec 2013 #9
+1 n/t cosmicone Dec 2013 #15
It's damned easy for us to sit here on the internet and criticize, but put yourself in their shoes groundloop Dec 2013 #10
It has been several weeks cosmicone Dec 2013 #16
Simpler possibility - they do not want to make the decision to take her off support karynnj Dec 2013 #20
+1 n/t Gormy Cuss Dec 2013 #28
She's not in a coma. She's brain-dead. There's a difference. pnwmom Dec 2013 #24
Maybe there was some kind of malpractice XemaSab Dec 2013 #23
Apparently not a resource problem since Children's is fighting efforts to move her to nursing home. Gormy Cuss Dec 2013 #27
they have ethical practices and laws to follow too. magical thyme Dec 2013 #31
I realize that, but it's still using up their resources Gormy Cuss Dec 2013 #32
it's also preventing an autopsy magical thyme Dec 2013 #33
I doubt that the parents care one whit about an autopsy. Gormy Cuss Dec 2013 #34
the parents are in denial that she has died magical thyme Dec 2013 #35
And denial is part of grief. Gormy Cuss Dec 2013 #36
actually I believe I've read the hospital has been very supportive with counseling, etc. magical thyme Dec 2013 #37
I agree the whole thing is so sad davidpdx Dec 2013 #38
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Jahi McMath's family seek...»Reply #25