Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

MoD tasked to recruit crew for ISRO's 'Man to Moon' mission bananas Dec 2013 #1
Call 1-800-LUNAR-TECH-SUPPORT bucolic_frolic Dec 2013 #2
i think it's good that they are doing things like this, better than getting into conflicts JI7 Dec 2013 #3
India has never attacked Pakistan or China cosmicone Dec 2013 #9
learn to read what people actually write JI7 Dec 2013 #10
India "getting into conflicts" cosmicone Dec 2013 #23
you sure are sensitive to certain things JI7 Dec 2013 #24
I don't cheer rapes whether in India or Steubenville cosmicone Dec 2013 #30
yes like the CIA conspiracy theories JI7 Dec 2013 #31
Because the cause of war is always a one sided problem right? /nt Drale Dec 2013 #27
It doesn't matter cosmicone Dec 2013 #29
Not even if I goad the person? NobodyHere Dec 2013 #32
Yep cosmicone Dec 2013 #49
I don't think I mentioned India anywhere in my post NobodyHere Dec 2013 #62
Did you read what I was responding to? cosmicone Dec 2013 #63
Another sign of the sun setting on the American Century. Comrade Grumpy Dec 2013 #4
Funny you are saying that... physioex Dec 2013 #5
Americans opposed it until about 1965 MyNameGoesHere Dec 2013 #6
America was not an impoverished country. former9thward Dec 2013 #14
Depends on who you ask I suppose MyNameGoesHere Dec 2013 #15
No it does not depend on who you ask. former9thward Dec 2013 #16
Ok you win MyNameGoesHere Dec 2013 #17
I don'y know if they were opposed to it or not. former9thward Dec 2013 #18
they are poor because of the wealthy stealing it , not because of a space program JI7 Dec 2013 #11
Indeed! onwardsand upwards Dec 2013 #20
not really, it's a false choice , it's like saying we have to cut food stamps in the US JI7 Dec 2013 #21
Actually, it is a real choice onwardsand upwards Dec 2013 #25
it's interesting that you would rather cut the space program than do something about the wealthy who JI7 Dec 2013 #28
I actually agree with you.... physioex Dec 2013 #34
Spending on science of the arts IS, actually, public policy. onwardsand upwards Dec 2013 #40
BS, the Elites like Romney are ones who want to get rid of PBS , public schools, postal service, etc JI7 Dec 2013 #43
But they don't want to touch the military or (dare I bring it back?) the space program, do they? onwardsand upwards Dec 2013 #45
they certainly do not support NASA and it's another program they just want to Cut JI7 Dec 2013 #46
They want to cut any public programs that help the poor and promote those that help the rich. onwardsand upwards Dec 2013 #50
i don't believe in conspiracy theories , i know the WEalthy don't pay taxes and that's what the JI7 Dec 2013 #53
That's not what I said. onwardsand upwards Dec 2013 #36
Space Program and other investment in Science and Arts is not a Waste, unlike ignoring WEalthy JI7 Dec 2013 #38
Again, you misinterpret me. onwardsand upwards Dec 2013 #41
of course you are because you accept the wealthy stealing and think one should accept the scraps JI7 Dec 2013 #42
No, I dont, man. onwardsand upwards Dec 2013 #47
hahah, that is accepting the wealthy stealing and accepting the false choice JI7 Dec 2013 #48
This time I really do give up. onwardsand upwards Dec 2013 #51
Don't count your chickens before they're hatched, ISRO.... paleotn Dec 2013 #7
When did we last put a man (or woman) on the moon? Comrade Grumpy Dec 2013 #8
It's been 37 years since anything was landed on the moon. bananas Dec 2013 #13
Dec. 14, 1972..... paleotn Dec 2013 #59
China did do something we no longer can do. former9thward Dec 2013 #58
Horse crap.... paleotn Dec 2013 #60
Wrong again. former9thward Dec 2013 #61
That isn't accurate at all.. NASA could easily send a rover to the moon if it wanted penultimate Dec 2013 #64
We can't even supply the International Space Station. former9thward Dec 2013 #65
There is no technical limitations that prevent them from doing so penultimate Dec 2013 #67
Except we can't just order parts for a Saturn V One_Life_To_Give Dec 2013 #72
To send people, that is accurate... penultimate Dec 2013 #73
Having been to India I think they would be better spending money at home. former9thward Dec 2013 #12
They would yes but then they will be to some extent Spider Jerusalem Dec 2013 #19
Providing food and medicine to dying children would provide more obvious benefits ... onwardsand upwards Dec 2013 #22
they do provide food and medicine already JI7 Dec 2013 #26
Sorry, but kids are still dying of poverty there. onwardsand upwards Dec 2013 #37
government spends on many things, people wer ein poverty before the space program, it's the wealthy JI7 Dec 2013 #39
Public arts and science programs are one way that the wealthy steal. onwardsand upwards Dec 2013 #44
i'm not wealthy and i have benefited from public arts programs, i don't believe i conspiracy crap JI7 Dec 2013 #54
That's crazy.... physioex Dec 2013 #66
Public funding for ballet, theatre, and symphony orchestras is regressive. onwardsand upwards Dec 2013 #70
Heh...As you wish. physioex Dec 2013 #71
not really our place to tell them how to spend their money Niceguy1 Dec 2013 #33
Well, yes, unless we're sending them aid money ... onwardsand upwards Dec 2013 #52
in the US there are children who don't have adequate health care, education etc JI7 Dec 2013 #55
They also have wealthy people who pay no taxes. EOM physioex Dec 2013 #35
Reminds me of an old Gil Scott Heron song. DisgustipatedinCA Dec 2013 #69
Absolutely disgusting while the country can't feed it own people... Atman Dec 2013 #56
My thoughts exactly warrant46 Dec 2013 #57
Message auto-removed Name removed Dec 2013 #68
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»After Mars mission, India...»Reply #27