Latest Breaking News
In reply to the discussion: The NSA Has A Way To Intercept Computers Mid-Shipment And Install Spyware On Them [View all]cprise
(8,445 posts)You are already having to trust Intel or AMD to a very great extent, and non-Vpro CPUs have large amounts of microcode and logic gates that can't be audited anyway.
IOW, you trust them not to be in cahoots with spies whether or not you have the remote provisioning capability.
Without a 3G link (and mind you, I ordered my Vpro-capable system without a WWAN/3G antenna) a CPU or other chip in the system could send encrypted data to an innocuous / non-existent Internet address and an organization like the NSA could easily intercept it. That is... IF the chips are compromised.
--
I have switched to using a hypervisor-based desktop OS called Qubes which employs advanced hardware features to provide strong system security. Its based on XEN and Linux and can run Windows too. The subject about hardware trust arises from time to time in Qubes discussions, and the consensus on the subject is pragmatic:
Since Qubes can isolate not just software but also hardware while in use, at least the number of companies/chips we have to trust are brought down to a bare minimum. You could get a Lenovo laptop with an Intel SSD, for instance, and only have to trust Lenovo + Intel (CPU, BIOS and hard drive).
A similar pragmatism gets people to use the HTTPS Everywhere browser addon these days. Even if the corporate world has made it possible for the NSA to spy on HTTPS links, it still takes a lot of effort on their part so using it is like throwing sand in the gears of mass surveillance.
BTW, I do think core hardware components probably *are* trustworthy... or else why would the NSA need to intercept devices to change them?