Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

VanillaRhapsody

(21,115 posts)
63. Thank You Jackpine...I appreciate your support!
Wed Jan 1, 2014, 09:57 PM
Jan 2014

It restores my faith that there ARE some men that "get it".

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Also saw NYT Breaking from AP BumRushDaShow Dec 2013 #1
The RCC is not a force for good, and has caused more harm then any good they have ever done weissmam Dec 2013 #3
They sure love persecution, seems the entire foundation of RCC is built on RKP5637 Jan 2014 #52
The Church lost all credibility on this back (assuming it ever had any) in the 1970s dflprincess Dec 2013 #4
He also lost all credibility when he let bishops strong-arm him on the issue in the '60s. AngryOldDem Jan 2014 #25
They won't deal with this at all warrant46 Jan 2014 #54
This is where the church is failing humanity RainDog Jan 2014 #56
Succinct and well said. theHandpuppet Jan 2014 #65
Looks like Justice Sotomayor is the only one working today (and Friday). Another case below Tx4obama Dec 2013 #2
I believe the cases went to her because the Justices have a division of effort based in which 24601 Jan 2014 #5
Yes, she is assigned to the 10th Circuit, a list below. It's just strange she's in news twice today Tx4obama Jan 2014 #7
Yep. civillawyer Jan 2014 #17
All that customerserviceguy Jan 2014 #6
Yep. Looking forward to seeing her push the button :) Tx4obama Jan 2014 #8
She should recuse herself. merh Jan 2014 #9
That's silly. So are the most right-wing members of the Court (Scalia, Roberts, Alito). The Velveteen Ocelot Jan 2014 #10
They all should recuse themselves if they are religious merh Jan 2014 #12
Yes, and the atheists should recuse themselves as well, hughee99 Jan 2014 #60
Let's not forget Clarence Thomas theHandpuppet Jan 2014 #66
She should recuse herself because because she's a woman. Drunken Irishman Jan 2014 #13
obviously your sarcasm is something your family appreciates merh Jan 2014 #36
You pretty much did. Drunken Irishman Jan 2014 #46
Do you think the case should be decided by the three non-Catholics? pnwmom Jan 2014 #16
All non-religious merh Jan 2014 #35
I don't get this religious liberties bullshit. CANDO Jan 2014 #11
The hospital thing is a bit of a grey area, if its a not for profit one then I suppose it would be cstanleytech Jan 2014 #20
Those hospitals take tax money. *Public* tax money. Ikonoklast Jan 2014 #44
Jesus had a motivational speaker gig, so, I guess, it's always been a business. nt valerief Jan 2014 #31
Evil Businesses that allow child sexual exploitation warrant46 Jan 2014 #58
NO ONE IS FORCING THE BUSINESS OWNERS TO USE CONTRACEPTION! MsPithy Jan 2014 #14
The law permits the business wners to infringe upon Jackpine Radical Jan 2014 #26
Men even on DU will say to "calm down" VanillaRhapsody Jan 2014 #51
I'm male, i'm on DU and I'm never calm about Jackpine Radical Jan 2014 #61
Thank You Jackpine...I appreciate your support! VanillaRhapsody Jan 2014 #63
The end. This is the answer. They can choose not to have "hobby lobby" and they can Squinch Jan 2014 #27
Disappointing... freshwest Jan 2014 #15
It is only a temporary stay... Tx4obama Jan 2014 #18
Her decision to block a law passed by Congress and the Senate and signed by Obama. freshwest Jan 2014 #19
as is their job... Niceguy1 Jan 2014 #21
It's not interesting to me. n/t freshwest Jan 2014 #22
That's pretty much what the Supreme Court does. rug Jan 2014 #48
Obviously, rug. They also decide not to hear them, as well. Or deny or approve. EOM. n/t freshwest Jan 2014 #50
do NOT confuse people with the facts! madrchsod Jan 2014 #40
A WIN for the rightwing. Thanks, SS. blkmusclmachine Jan 2014 #23
Possibly stupid question here, but... AngryOldDem Jan 2014 #24
Because the Pope knows what is best for you. Marrah_G Jan 2014 #29
I keep thinking of the old adage AngryOldDem Jan 2014 #32
This pisses me the hell off Marrah_G Jan 2014 #28
This is a door-opener to all kinds of corporate demands. valerief Jan 2014 #30
Puzzling Proud Liberal Dem Jan 2014 #33
Remember that it's just a temporary stay. Jim Lane Jan 2014 #57
tax the churches warrior1 Jan 2014 #34
my sentiments merh Jan 2014 #37
Can we now stop... awoke_in_2003 Jan 2014 #38
Does anyone have any idea how the courts will lean on the Hobby Lobby ruling? Paula Sims Jan 2014 #39
The title to the article should read: SC Halts contraception mandate for CORPORATIONS okaawhatever Jan 2014 #41
business is business, church is church StoneCarver Jan 2014 #42
Start asking men why they need Viagra and why insurance companies have to pay for it katmondoo Jan 2014 #43
Does ACA require insurance companies to pay for Viagra? (n/t) thesquanderer Jan 2014 #45
This is a rather weak argument considering that most insurance doesn't cover ED medications... Humanist_Activist Jan 2014 #49
They should not pay for Viagra. former9thward Jan 2014 #53
What is the real issue? humbled_opinion Jan 2014 #47
Contraception can be pricy *and* be for medical reasons, Lars39 Jan 2014 #55
I suspect we're arguing in a semantic vacuum. Igel Jan 2014 #59
Thanks for clarification... humbled_opinion Jan 2014 #67
Ha --- Planned Parenthood----You Have to be Kidding warrant46 Jan 2014 #62
I'm a man, and I believe this halt is wrong! Indyfan53 Jan 2014 #64
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Supreme Court halts contr...»Reply #63