Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

niyad

(132,138 posts)
7. the woman is, in fact, brain dead, and there is no baby--there is a fetus. we make a huge
Wed Jan 22, 2014, 11:27 PM
Jan 2014

mistake in using the framing of the anti-choice, woman-hating, pro-forced birthers.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

I hope he wins, and soon. nt msanthrope Jan 2014 #1
The forced-birthers/fetus-fetishists will drag this family as far through the mud as possible... blkmusclmachine Jan 2014 #2
some of them are here CreekDog Jan 2014 #33
This whole thing is just so insane... TreasonousBastard Jan 2014 #3
The anti-choicers are religiously insane. No logic, science, or simple humanity is involved in their blkmusclmachine Jan 2014 #4
+1 n/t NealK Jan 2014 #17
Send all medical bills elfin Jan 2014 #5
Yes. Because marriage ends at death, so this man isn't responsible for any of them. n/t pnwmom Jan 2014 #20
As someone said, this is an experiment with the mother's body as an ecosystem. pnwmom Jan 2014 #6
"rational person" NealK Jan 2014 #19
the woman is, in fact, brain dead, and there is no baby--there is a fetus. we make a huge niyad Jan 2014 #7
+100 theHandpuppet Jan 2014 #9
Dear God; this seems like a horror movie. nolabear Jan 2014 #8
it is, indeed, a horror. maybe civil suits costing the pukes who wrote, and are enforcing, this niyad Jan 2014 #11
Didn't she have a Living Will with a DNR? ReRe Jan 2014 #10
Seems it it is Texas state law justamama83 Jan 2014 #12
the state of texas (and 30 others) have a lovely little provision in the law that pregnancy negates niyad Jan 2014 #13
She did have a DNR davidpdx Jan 2014 #14
Since there's proof the fetus isn't developing normally, will they finally pull the plug? MrsKirkley Jan 2014 #15
Probably not. jeff47 Jan 2014 #18
This is what happens when Republican TeaBaggers play at being god's instrument. n/t proReality Jan 2014 #16
Heartbreaking. blackspade Jan 2014 #21
she is already legally dead stg81 Jan 2014 #22
To quote Mark Geragos davidpdx Jan 2014 #31
The mother is already dead. kestrel91316 Jan 2014 #23
I don't understand why I couldn't be done now davidpdx Jan 2014 #34
Not surprised rebecca_herman Jan 2014 #24
This whole story is just sick. Hulk Jan 2014 #25
This is sick, especially in a state where executions occur almost monthly.. mountain grammy Jan 2014 #26
Sick. Solly Mack Jan 2014 #27
The fetus was 10 weeks before minimal viability when she died. Warpy Jan 2014 #28
See post #31 davidpdx Jan 2014 #32
evil frwrfpos Jan 2014 #29
pro birther's remind me of the human experiments done by Nazi's Herself Jan 2014 #30
Of course, the anti-choicers would shout it's murder sakabatou Jan 2014 #35
So who is going to pay get the red out Jan 2014 #36
This is so easy to fix dickthegrouch Jan 2014 #37
It is ludicrous. hamsterjill Jan 2014 #38
Since it is Texas, couldn't they just play the religious belief card? Amimnoch Jan 2014 #39
he should have her transferred to a near by state that has no such provision NNguyenMD Jan 2014 #40
See Post #34 davidpdx Jan 2014 #41
The woman's wishes should be followed because they were her wishes, not because the fetus is Brickbat Jan 2014 #42
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Fetus of Texas woman on l...»Reply #7