Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

spin

(17,493 posts)
21. Usually the stock market climbs when a Democrat is President but doesn't do as well when ...
Fri Jan 24, 2014, 12:16 AM
Jan 2014

a Republican is in the White House.

Stocks Return More With Democrat in White House: BGOV Barometer
By Bob Drummond Feb 22, 2012 12:00 AM ET

The BGOV Barometer shows that, over the five decades since John F. Kennedy was inaugurated, $1,000 invested in a hypothetical fund that tracks the Standard & Poor’s 500 Index (SPX) only when Democrats are in the White House would have been worth $10,920 at the close of trading yesterday.

That’s more than nine times the dollar return an investor would have realized from following a similar strategy during Republican administrations. A $1,000 stake invested in a fund that followed the S&P 500 under Republican presidents, starting with Richard Nixon, would have grown to $2,087 on the day George W. Bush left office.

“The market does tend to do better under Democrats than under Republicans,” Sam Stovall, chief investment strategist at S&P Equity Research in New York, said in a telephone interview. “Is it because Republicans mishandled the economy, or inherited a weak economy? I’ll leave that to others.”

***snip***

“I dare say that most people on Wall Street are Republicans,” Stovall said. “But it appears the bread is buttered on the Democratic side.”
http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2012-02-22/stocks-return-more-with-dem-in-white-house-bgov-barometer.html


Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

What do we do when both parties are to the right of America? Ash_F Jan 2014 #1
Neither party. The owners of those "two" parties won't allow it. villager Jan 2014 #2
President Obama said it himself yeoman6987 Jan 2014 #3
And he plans to do just that. Even Paul Krugman, who hasn't always been an Obama fan, is Liberal_Stalwart71 Jan 2014 #10
Or, what do we do when Americans are so grossly misinformed that they blame the president Liberal_Stalwart71 Jan 2014 #9
The so-called "Democrats" don't even put up the semblance of a fight anymore. It's just roll over & blkmusclmachine Jan 2014 #17
All Democrats? Liberal_Stalwart71 Jan 2014 #18
ok... sendero Jan 2014 #27
It's called Democraticunderground, Not center-right business establishment underground. Ash_F Jan 2014 #25
Show me the Democratic Party platform. Then show me exactly where there are center right Liberal_Stalwart71 Jan 2014 #28
I didn't stay home. Ash_F Jan 2014 #30
I didn't say YOU stayed home. I didn't YOU said 95%. I pointed to someone who responded to Liberal_Stalwart71 Jan 2014 #31
"We can't push them further to the left" Ash_F Jan 2014 #33
Look eighty percent of what any President accomplishes is done through truedelphi Jan 2014 #26
the two parties are free to do what they like on gays, god, and anything else that doesn't yurbud Jan 2014 #29
Honestly, if we want to know who is to blame I look at the GOP and especially the GOP House LynneSin Jan 2014 #4
Damned straight..... President does not equal King groundloop Jan 2014 #8
From Birther to Benghazi grilled onions Jan 2014 #11
It's not just on the political right. I wish it were. He was received hell from the political left Liberal_Stalwart71 Jan 2014 #13
if obama were a republican, they'd be saying that the dow has more than doubled unblock Jan 2014 #5
Usually the stock market climbs when a Democrat is President but doesn't do as well when ... spin Jan 2014 #21
yes, that's been true for a long time and has only gotten more so since clinton. unblock Jan 2014 #22
Almost all political conflict... between the Sane Billionaires and the Insane Billionaires. immoderate Jan 2014 #6
The problem for him is, it's mostly chickens from the last decade, and more, coming TwilightGardener Jan 2014 #7
The Obamacare rollout was not "brought on himself". It was sabotaged from the very beginning. Liberal_Stalwart71 Jan 2014 #12
Well, I have to disagree about the Obamacare intro, because that was TwilightGardener Jan 2014 #14
She wasn't fired because I believe that they all knew how they were being set up from the beginning. Liberal_Stalwart71 Jan 2014 #15
I hear what you're saying about low-quality/lowest-bidder contractors, TwilightGardener Jan 2014 #19
I hear you, but I still think he did right by keeping the team. They cleaned up the mess and now Liberal_Stalwart71 Jan 2014 #20
Honestly, in hindsight, the healthcare.gov problems are pretty irrelelvant and not that big of deal. phleshdef Jan 2014 #23
Exactly. That's the point I was trying to make in my posts. Read my responses below. Liberal_Stalwart71 Jan 2014 #24
The 1% is doing quite well, thank you very much. Everyone else, well ... blkmusclmachine Jan 2014 #16
President Obama has been a very good CEO-like decision maker. 1000words Jan 2014 #32
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Poll: At Obama's 5-yr poi...»Reply #21