Latest Breaking News

Jackpine Radical

(45,274 posts)

78. Manny, I think 1StrongBlackMan is right.

Sat Jan 25, 2014, 11:17 AM

Jan 2014

The popular press seems to have it wrong. I too had thought it was 5 years, but found this:

www.fas.org/sgp/crs/misc/RL31253.pdf‎

Statutes of Limitation in Federal Criminal Cases: An Overview

Appendix A. Periods of Limitation for Specific Federal Crimes

-(Excerpts)-

10 years

18 U.S.C. 844 (i) (burning or bombing property used in or used in activities affecting commerce) 18 U.S.C. 1005 (fraud concerning bank entries, reports and transactions)
18 U.S.C. 1006 (fraud concerning federal credit institution entries, reports and transactions)
18 U.S.C. 1007 (fraud concerning Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation transactions)
18 U.S.C. 1014 (fraud concerning loan and credit applications generally; renewals and discounts; crop insurance)
18 U.S.C. 1033 (crimes by or affecting persons engaged in the business of insurance) 18 U.S.C. 1344 (bank fraud)
18 U.S.C. 1341 (mail fraud affecting a financial institution)
18 U.S.C. 1343 (wire fraud affecting a financial institution)

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

97 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Holder says no bank 'too big to indict,' more financial cases coming [View all] Newsjock Jan 2014 OP

Now that the statute of limitations on fraud has expired... MannyGoldstein Jan 2014 #1

+1 The timing is almost too perfect Moliere Jan 2014 #15

+1 liberal_at_heart Jan 2014 #17

Exactly. Asses have been covered, emails deleted, papers destroyed ... 1000words Jan 2014 #18

Eric Holder, hand maiden in the Dimond Dance of Doom for you and me. roguevalley Jan 2014 #23

+1 SoapBox Jan 2014 #19

Thank you. woo me with science Jan 2014 #22

Notice what? ... 1StrongBlackMan Jan 2014 #52

Please reference this document. TM99 Jan 2014 #71

Here ya go ... 1StrongBlackMan Jan 2014 #74

As far as the statute of limitations is concerned, ronnie624 Jan 2014 #84

I know you support this president and his administration TM99 Jan 2014 #87

Yes, I do support this President and his administration, though NOT unconditionally ... 1StrongBlackMan Jan 2014 #88

It is very clear. TM99 Jan 2014 #89

it seems that 1StrongBlackMan Jan 2014 #90

I appreciate your reply. TM99 Jan 2014 #91

Okay, This will be my last post on this topic ... 1StrongBlackMan Jan 2014 #92

Thank you for taking the time to clarify that. TM99 Jan 2014 #95

Well ... 1StrongBlackMan Jan 2014 #96

This is what leads one to pause. TM99 Jan 2014 #97

Is that correct? I thought after the Savings & Loan disaster congress made it 10 yrs for banks. nt okaawhatever Jan 2014 #40

You are correct. n/t 1StrongBlackMan Jan 2014 #42

Sadly, no. MannyGoldstein Jan 2014 #55

No it hasn't ... 1StrongBlackMan Jan 2014 #93

You may be right. MannyGoldstein Jan 2014 #94

Where do you get that from ... 1StrongBlackMan Jan 2014 #41

AFAIK, all of the press is saying that the 5-year window expired MannyGoldstein Jan 2014 #56

Okay ... 1StrongBlackMan Jan 2014 #57

What's in those sections it calls out? MannyGoldstein Jan 2014 #59

Did you go to the link? ... 1StrongBlackMan Jan 2014 #60

It's funny how people on DU can bemoan the press 99% of the time davidpdx Jan 2014 #62

They trust the press ... 1StrongBlackMan Jan 2014 #66

It links to laws. MannyGoldstein Jan 2014 #67

The press doesn't often flat-out lie? ... 1StrongBlackMan Jan 2014 #69

AFAIK, they passed along lies MannyGoldstein Jan 2014 #70

And this is exactly what the press is doing in this case ... 1StrongBlackMan Jan 2014 #73

Plus, when it comes to fraud, there usually is an extension to account for discovery of the fraud treestar Jan 2014 #79

Actually, that's not the case ... 1StrongBlackMan Jan 2014 #83

BTW ... 1StrongBlackMan Jan 2014 #64

As far as I know... nt MannyGoldstein Jan 2014 #65

Manny, I think 1StrongBlackMan is right. Jackpine Radical Jan 2014 #78

Won't be convincing to people determined to believe Holder and Obama treestar Jan 2014 #80

Looks like it's a bit murky: MannyGoldstein Jan 2014 #86

+1 a shit load...........nt Enthusiast Jan 2014 #72

First thought to cross my mind on seeing the headline, too. Jackpine Radical Jan 2014 #77

Hey Eric, there's people commiting those crimes, not "institutions". Scuba Jan 2014 #2

Reading is your friend. phleshdef Jan 2014 #3

Of course they can be indicted. Lasher Jan 2014 #11

I was just responding to what the other poster said. phleshdef Jan 2014 #12

Recognizing that individuals were behind the Wall Street games Aerows Jan 2014 #36

Investigations into the kind of large scale financial fraud are a lot more complicated... phleshdef Jan 2014 #38

Blah blah blah Aerows Jan 2014 #39

Sounds like the opinion of someone that doesn't understand the situation. phleshdef Jan 2014 #58

And does not wish to. treestar Jan 2014 #81

Yes ... 1StrongBlackMan Jan 2014 #43

Yeah, it's really rough Aerows Jan 2014 #46

Holder has been seeking campaign donations? Do tell? n/t 1StrongBlackMan Jan 2014 #51

and yet no one is going to jail. Burf-_- Jan 2014 #5

Different set of laws ... 1StrongBlackMan Jan 2014 #44

+1000 !!!! orpupilofnature57 Jan 2014 #76

Then they fork over some money and recieve a get out of jail free card. yourout Jan 2014 #4

Indict! Indict! Indict! hrmjustin Jan 2014 #6

Who needs evidence, testimony, witnesses, or specific charges? FrodosPet Jan 2014 #7

How long has it been..... raindaddy Jan 2014 #9

Did the investigations just start? FrodosPet Jan 2014 #13

It's more than that ... 1StrongBlackMan Jan 2014 #47

More talk than anything else.... raindaddy Jan 2014 #63

Okay. n/t 1StrongBlackMan Jan 2014 #68

+1 n/t 1StrongBlackMan Jan 2014 #45

Watch out bankers, you're going to get your wrist slapped! progressoid Jan 2014 #8

The tongue-lashing will be epic. n/t Aerows Jan 2014 #37

"we have other things that are in the pipeline" like busting pot dispensary's. L0oniX Jan 2014 #10

What has suddenly gotten into Holder? Has he been quietly investigating all these cases for all this jwirr Jan 2014 #14

Statute of Limitations ran out Aerows Jan 2014 #31

No it hasn't. n/t 1StrongBlackMan Jan 2014 #48

You can count on it ... 1StrongBlackMan Jan 2014 #49

He should have told Lanny Breuer that on day one Jack Rabbit Jan 2014 #16

Holder your a fucking joke. Phlem Jan 2014 #20

If this wasn't so freaking hilarious... Javaman Jan 2014 #21

Bullshit ! You, sir, are a toady to the financial institutions. russspeakeasy Jan 2014 #24

I'm waiting with bated breath. JDPriestly Jan 2014 #25

I call TOTAL BS! lark Jan 2014 #26

Wall Street Unknown Beatle Jan 2014 #27

Riddle me this, Mr. Holder: Brigid Jan 2014 #28

Different laws ... 1StrongBlackMan Jan 2014 #53

I will believe it when I see Jamie Dimon handcuffed Kelvin Mace Jan 2014 #29

I'm guessing he doesn't have any boxes in his garage Aerows Jan 2014 #34

I see he's changed his mind. DeSwiss Jan 2014 #30

It's easy to talk tough now Aerows Jan 2014 #33

I know. DeSwiss Jan 2014 #35

Oh look Aerows Jan 2014 #32

Dude, ... 1StrongBlackMan Jan 2014 #50

Actually has done more on white collar crime than the last three GOP AGs combined. But then kelliekat44 Jan 2014 #61

Selective memory = selective indictment. blkmusclmachine Jan 2014 #54

Talk is cheap, Mr. Holder. I'll believe it when I see it. magical thyme Jan 2014 #75

Why some cannot admit he is doing what they wanted treestar Jan 2014 #82

Any Day Now jsr Jan 2014 #85