Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Latest Breaking News
In reply to the discussion: Holder says no bank 'too big to indict,' more financial cases coming [View all]TM99
(8,352 posts)87. I know you support this president and his administration
unconditionally from your posts.
However, concerning your links and mine, there is an obvious discrepancy. 3293 does NOT fall within the 10 year statue of limitation according to my referenced document from CRS from October of 2012. According to yours from Cornell, it does.
Would you care to explain why without snark?
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
97 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Holder says no bank 'too big to indict,' more financial cases coming [View all]
Newsjock
Jan 2014
OP
Yes, I do support this President and his administration, though NOT unconditionally ...
1StrongBlackMan
Jan 2014
#88
Is that correct? I thought after the Savings & Loan disaster congress made it 10 yrs for banks. nt
okaawhatever
Jan 2014
#40
Plus, when it comes to fraud, there usually is an extension to account for discovery of the fraud
treestar
Jan 2014
#79
Investigations into the kind of large scale financial fraud are a lot more complicated...
phleshdef
Jan 2014
#38
What has suddenly gotten into Holder? Has he been quietly investigating all these cases for all this
jwirr
Jan 2014
#14
Actually has done more on white collar crime than the last three GOP AGs combined. But then
kelliekat44
Jan 2014
#61