Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Atman

(31,464 posts)
22. My wife dealt with this at the first unionize hospital she worked at*.
Mon Jan 27, 2014, 12:48 PM
Jan 2014
*At which she worked. My apologies to the teachers union!

One of the first work stories she told me upon returning home from her new job (a couple of decades ago) was about a spill in a patient's room. The patient (now they call them "clients&quot knocked a liquid off his bedstand. It hit the trash can, spilling the contents on the floor. They sent in a worker who cleaned up the solid trash, but left the liquid on the floor. He said union rules forbade him from touching liquid spills. That was not his job.

NOW WAIT -- BEFORE YOU FLAME --

I know some lurkers are already lunging for the keyboard, and even some DUers want to be outraged. But consider this...what are "liquids" in a hospital? My wife had a bag of blood explode in a patient's room, showering her Carrie-style. She had to go through HIV testing for a very long time until she was considered okay. What is a grunt-level worker supposed to do when confronted with bodily fluids and nasty stuff on the floor of a sick patient's room? Believe me, if it were up to the bean counters, if it were up to the management, that grunt would just mop up the effluvia, toss it in a red trash bag, and hope he lived to get his Fifth Anniversary pin.

It's complicated to the average Joe struggling to pay his own rent. He/she sees the unionized worker as getting all these special privileges that he/she doesn't get. But the GOP has been BRILLIANT at framing the argument. Those damned union workers are taking money from you! They're killing the job market for you! But I seldom hear from Democrats (except for me and the people I work with, tilting at GOP windmills) screaming from the mountaintop, showing workers the history; they don't need LESS unions, as the bosses say, they need MORE unions. They need to fight back. Stop cowering behind the Walmart cash register because you're scared of missing the rent.

Democrats are sorely lacking on educating our voting base. The GOP on the other hand, doesn't need to worry. They have Fox "News." They have a built-in base of dumbness who will fear ANYONE who doesn't attend their Sunday worship. Anyone who doesn't look like them or talk like them. The lowest common denominator. The GOP party leaders know this. They know it all too well. It is their Trump card (sic).

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

I Would Bet Them Nine Justices bkanderson76 Jan 2014 #1
The Chief Justice is paid $255,500 per year, Freddie Stubbs Jan 2014 #3
Some spouses of SCOTUS Judges are paid much, much more.... Fred Sanders Jan 2014 #7
ding ding ding we have a winner. Amimnoch Jan 2014 #18
Ok, fine, easy fix, sked14 Jan 2014 #2
Since when do CLOTHES equal SAFETY GEAR ???? groundloop Jan 2014 #4
You don't work in your "street clothes" when you work in a steel mill. former9thward Jan 2014 #5
Agree it might seem petty but there is an argument to be made..... Swede Atlanta Jan 2014 #8
At first I thought that the union was right. Shemp Howard Jan 2014 #11
I believe Police Officers are paid by salary so it is irrelevant Bandit Jan 2014 #27
Non management police officers are paid hourly wages, sked14 Jan 2014 #34
Putting on clothing that doesn't require any additional time than one would spend getting dressed okaawhatever Jan 2014 #42
Then they need to get it added into their contract the next time. SCOTUS did say cstanleytech Jan 2014 #41
I'd bet it was US Steel that took it to court Demeter Jan 2014 #33
It was union members. former9thward Jan 2014 #36
i can`t believe they wasted a ton of money and time either. madrchsod Jan 2014 #35
The clothes include the following (From the Court's Opinion): happyslug Jan 2014 #17
Here is the actual opinion happyslug Jan 2014 #6
this is disgracfull... Veilex Jan 2014 #9
The court expressly does NOT overturn Steiner v. Mitchell, 350 U. S. 247 (1956) happyslug Jan 2014 #20
boy this ruling stinks Botany Jan 2014 #10
Had an Uncle who worked in a Steel Mill packman Jan 2014 #12
That's an important, and telling, story. Shemp Howard Jan 2014 #19
Amen packman Jan 2014 #24
My wife dealt with this at the first unionize hospital she worked at*. Atman Jan 2014 #22
Rec 1,000x! Peace Patriot Jan 2014 #28
What is a "dead-to-the-core Democrat?" Atman Jan 2014 #25
This may sound like an anti-union position from a very pro-union guy, but... Atman Jan 2014 #13
Even at ad agencies, creatives don't wear suits & ties. Demit Jan 2014 #30
I used to work in a corporate art/marketing department. Atman Jan 2014 #38
IF they allow clothing to be paid time bucolic_frolic Jan 2014 #14
Theres clothing, and then theres other. quakerboy Jan 2014 #44
Looks like a good day for republicans, they get to screw some workers. Kingofalldems Jan 2014 #15
there`s no screwing the workers... madrchsod Jan 2014 #40
#1 on this blog sure said it all very well and... TRoN33 Jan 2014 #16
I worked in a rolling mill and a coke plant. former9thward Jan 2014 #21
+10 Atman Jan 2014 #23
Actually the court ruled, it violates the Portal to Portal Act of 1947 happyslug Jan 2014 #26
Have this group of RepubliCON Dancing Supremes ever ruled in favor of Unions? fasttense Jan 2014 #29
this is the way we worked it out at the steel plant where i worked madrchsod Jan 2014 #31
Can't believe all the anti union crap in here. ForgoTheConsequence Jan 2014 #32
When I worked for GM michreject Jan 2014 #37
the workers deserve to get paid for that, but the union didn't negotiate for it. geek tragedy Jan 2014 #39
No, the Portal to Portal Act is contract dependent happyslug Jan 2014 #43
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»U.S. Steel wins Supreme C...»Reply #22