Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Major Nikon

(36,925 posts)
3. Not any more than without those things
Thu Feb 6, 2014, 02:11 PM
Feb 2014

I'm both a pilot and someone who has engineered and installed lightning protection systems. I've visited towers and seen how the FAA does it. It's not that complicated. They install lightning rods on the top of the buildings higher than everything else and they install large diameter braided copper line than runs along the exterior of the building bonded to earth ground. This is industry standard (which many private entities don't comply with). While I haven't been to all FAA towers, the ones I have been to are this way so I have no reason to suspect they all aren't. The FAA reports this is the only instance where someone has been injured. If this is true it's a testament to how well their system works. There is no system that is going to guarantee their employees in all instances. A powerful enough lightning strike will find all paths to ground and not just those that have the least resistance.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»APNewsBreak: FAA to exami...»Reply #3