Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Latest Breaking News
In reply to the discussion: Snowden Docs: British Spies Used Sex and 'Dirty Tricks' [View all]Hissyspit
(45,790 posts)22. Nonsense.
This has nothing to do with whether he is naive or not, but thanks for getting in the requisite gratuitous 'attack the messenger.'
Civil libertarians said that in using a DDOS attack against hackers the British government also infringed free speech by individuals not involved in any illegal hacking, and may have blocked other websites with no connection to Anonymous. While GCHQ defends the legality of its actions, critics question whether the agency is too aggressive and its mission too broad.
Eric King, a lawyer who teaches IT law at the London School of Economics and is head of research at Privacy International, a British civil liberties advocacy group, said it was remarkable that the British government thought it had the right to hack computers, since none of the U.K.s intelligence agencies has a clear lawful authority to launch their own attacks.
GCHQ has no clear authority to send a virus or conduct cyber attacks, said King. Hacking is one of the most invasive methods of surveillance. King said British cyber spies had gone on offense with no legal safeguards and without any public debate, even though the British government has criticized other nations, like Russia, for allegedly engaging in cyber warfare.
Eric King, a lawyer who teaches IT law at the London School of Economics and is head of research at Privacy International, a British civil liberties advocacy group, said it was remarkable that the British government thought it had the right to hack computers, since none of the U.K.s intelligence agencies has a clear lawful authority to launch their own attacks.
GCHQ has no clear authority to send a virus or conduct cyber attacks, said King. Hacking is one of the most invasive methods of surveillance. King said British cyber spies had gone on offense with no legal safeguards and without any public debate, even though the British government has criticized other nations, like Russia, for allegedly engaging in cyber warfare.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
151 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Somebody get that boy a set of the James Bond movies so he learns what he is dealing with...
VanillaRhapsody
Feb 2014
#104
Maybe not - but if you voted for them, don't complain that their policies represent "stealing"
brooklynite
Feb 2014
#60
Ahhh . . . taxes pay for roads, bridges, ports, the military, garbage collection . . .
brush
Feb 2014
#106
The Oligarchs, Corporations And Banks Own And Control The Politicians That Own And Control Us
cantbeserious
Feb 2014
#115
The garbage still has to be collected, and the roads need to be plowed in the winter. nt
brush
Feb 2014
#116
A Very Libertarian Point Of View - Essential Government Services Only - No More - No Less
cantbeserious
Feb 2014
#117
Libertarians Always Argue For Limited Government - Essential Services Is Limited Government
cantbeserious
Feb 2014
#119
Taxes Are Resources Extracted From The Populace To Benefit The Oligarchs - That Is Theft
cantbeserious
Feb 2014
#124
The Roads Are Paid For By Minions - To Travel To Work - To Benefit The Oligarchs
cantbeserious
Feb 2014
#126
For Those That Work - Roads Are Used - To Pay The Taxes - That Benefit The Oligarchs
cantbeserious
Feb 2014
#128
We Do Not Live In A Nation Of Laws Any Longer - For Proof - Reference The 1%
cantbeserious
Feb 2014
#95
There is no justifiable reason for Snowden/Greenwald to release this kind of information
pnwmom
Feb 2014
#11
It is naive to think that governments do not infringe on civil liberties on a regular basis.
Beacool
Feb 2014
#29
Again, the irrelevant cut and paste from you like it is supposed to make a point...
Demenace
Feb 2014
#38
Again, the irrelevant cut and paste from you like it is supposed to make a point...
xocet
Feb 2014
#76
Did you read the background on your pal or anything that seeks to educate you is...
Demenace
Feb 2014
#77
Wonder if Snowden's 180 degree change of heart had anything to to with a black president? nt
brush
Feb 2014
#110
Wait until the Russians come across some documents that expose Russian spying...
George II
Feb 2014
#23
Snowden's really got his feet taped to the pedals on this whole spying thing
BeyondGeography
Feb 2014
#31
I'm just not worried about Snowden - he's one guy, and he is no longer in a position to handle
Maedhros
Feb 2014
#82
Dude, we are adults, we should be able to do both for the sake of our country...
Demenace
Feb 2014
#94
Were I of the authoritarian mindset I would certainly agree with every word you have posted.
Maedhros
Feb 2014
#143
What has his exposures on foreign activities against foreign nations or governments...
Demenace
Feb 2014
#148
Did you visit Salon.com or anything that does not fit your worldview must be baised?
Demenace
Feb 2014
#96
Can somebody tell Snowden that spies do shit that would be considered unethical in ordinary life?
alcibiades_mystery
Feb 2014
#98
So far, I have not been suprised or shocked on anything Snowden/Greenwald has released
itsrobert
Feb 2014
#135