Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Latest Breaking News
In reply to the discussion: Greenwald debuts Omidyar-backed The Intercept [View all]Luminous Animal
(27,310 posts)5. He is not the owner or even a partner in the company.
FYI. Anyone else would NOT have dumped the docs. Nearly all of the news agencies who have reported on the docs that they have seen or have in their possession have published then with redactions to avoid putting peoples lives at risk.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
48 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
RIDICULOUS -- in THIS world, as it is, you need big bucks to be heard in the mainstream!
cloudythescribbler
Feb 2014
#4
And Greenwald et al have been publishing quality stuff for other big bucks news orgs.
Luminous Animal
Feb 2014
#18
Why do you lie Josh. That shows absolutely nothing. After the cables were dumped by the Guardian,
Luminous Animal
Feb 2014
#25
You are so wrong. February of 2010 is when Wikileaks received the cables. November of 2010 is when
Luminous Animal
Feb 2014
#27
Yes. Go back to to occasional articles of interest which of course means publishing near every day..
Luminous Animal
Feb 2014
#28
LOL, Greenwald has the cool, calm temperament, & unbiased opinion needed to professionally lead a
FSogol
Feb 2014
#40
Any poster can kick any post at any time. That seems to be what happened here. nt
bemildred
Apr 2014
#46